1042 réponses à ce sujet

[10K]

make syn ending cannon ending , it wont be mentioned, MC doesn't understand the change in him or her, but he will figure out what happened to him, but not why, he gets hit by that wave that changed all while hes in FTL with hes ship, it also makes ship stop for short time
 
syn ending is the most interesting from all of them anyway

How about no. Synthesis ending was awful, and it was especially condescending to EDI and Legion character. They were learning what it ment to be individuals themselves. They slowly grew and learned what it ment to be alive. Then here comes synthesis to erase all that growth, making it all pointless. Synthesis was an abomination, nothing more

[KaiserShep]

I literally starting this line of conversation with you in the back on my mind, Alan. You never disappoint.

You can watch all 3 endings on YouTube. The proof is in the pudding. It doesn't really matter if you accept or deny the facts. The facts are the facts. The wording is objectively present tense. None of it is past tense. None of it has happened.

That being the case, can you prove that any of it actualizes? I mean, blah blah blah it gives me warm fuzzies isn't an argument. I get that you believe this stuff happens, but why should we? Especially considering the very wording proves it hasn't.

And why wouldn't Hackett hope for good things to come to the Normandy crew, the krogan, qurians, etc.? You think he's some kind of heartless a-hole?

Let me ask you a question. How can Samara reunite with her daughter if she's in some out in the middle of nowhere star cluster with a population of 1 (Falere herself) with no relay network? How does Samara ever see Thessia again in her lifetime? How does Wrex and Grunt get back to Tuchanka overnight (Grunt still has baby plates)? How long do you figure it will take to rebuild planets that have been reduced to rubble (no infrastructure), then research mass relay technology and replicate it then fly to each relay in the network one by one repairing them to make a path to any given world? The Quarian homeworld is literally on the other side of the galaxy from Earth. Even slow boating it isn't an option and even then that's centuries for even the relatively close worlds to earth. Ugh, I could go on and on about the horrendous outcome of Destroy. Warm fuzzies aside every single ending is a trainwreck.

But I have no problem with you believing everything is fine and dandy. That's why they are ignoring it all. They know it's irredeemable garbage. And that's why Andromeda gives the players the ability to embrace their fantasies in regard to ME3. Even if those fantasies aren't in line with the actual game lore or story. For me the MEHEM will have to do as the canon ending. See?

 

 

So in Control, AI Shepard is merely hoping to rebuild the relay network? Codswallop. Balderdash even. 

[Sugram84]

Stop feeding the troll

ur the Troll

& Not me

[Sugram84]

Not sure if troll...or if OP really doesn't realize that they changed the setting to Andromeda to 100% avoid the ME3 endings, most likely by having the Ark ships leave before the end of the Reaper War.

Going with troll due to spelling errors worse than a 15 year old.

hah, but then they can't make me 5 & 6, if they want to do them they need to include the endings in next ME 3 games, unless they want to say its new universe where Shep never existed, talking about multiverse, they cant avoid it forever 

[10K]

hah, but then they can't make me 5 & 6, if they want to do them they need to include the endings in next ME 3 games, unless they want to say its new universe where Shep never existed, talking about multiverse, they cant avoid it forever

What are you talking about? They didn't need to make a ending canon for Andromeda, why would they need a canon ending for any other ME game. Definetly a troll.

[Sugram84]

How about no. Synthesis ending was awful, and it was especially condescending to EDI and Legion character. They were learning what it ment to be individuals themselves. They slowly grew and learned what it ment to be alive. Then here comes synthesis to erase all that growth, making it all pointless. Synthesis was an abomination, nothing more

also it was to so other races & Ai's could understand each-other to go towards peace, well less conflict between the 2 sides, cause some1 will find a reason to start war with them, but without Syn ending it would be like the Boy when gave Shep choices said, the circle wont stop, some1 creates mechanic sentient  being & then they start to fear their creation & want to kill it & then history repeats itself, Quarrian history with some other race  

[Sugram84]

What are you talking about? They didn't need to make a ending canon for Andromeda, why would they need a canon ending for any other ME game. Definetly a troll.

not Troll, how come talking about how i feel & think about it makes me Troll?

Troll is some1 who talks BS for no reason, for fun

 

also i said they should make Syn ending cannon, so when Andromeda starts it shows MC ship getting hit by the energy wave from Syn ending, what changed all life

[Sugram84]

I don't see a problem with that. I would like to have a game after ME3 showing the rebuilding of the galaxy. I doubt everything was all goody-two-shoe in the epilogues that was shown.
 

Those folks don't have to buy the game.
 

Genocide? What genocide? There wasn't any genocide when I pick destroy

yes there was, all mechanic Sentient life was destroyed/killed, cause they are not organic doesn't mean its not a life & that their feelings are not real

[Sugram84]

This thread again ?

 

There's no canon ending, BW said it. Your end is not better than others ! I picked the destroy ending (with shepard alive) but I don't want to impose my choice to anybody here. Why would you ?

Why there's always people who want their ending to be a better than all the others ? NO.

 

MEA a new galaxy, a fresh start, period.

 

 

 

i said they should... not that there is

[nfi42]

Bioware has been overwriting player choices on various levels for a while and the ME3 ending should of been just another rewrite to make ME4.

It would of been better if Bioware did just trample all over ME3's endings and forced a post destroy canon along with burying all choices from the trilogy by starting after a very long lapse of time post ME3.

An overwhelming majority of players that finished ME3 selected Destroy (which wasn't my choice either), that said the Destroy option does produce the least corrupted post ME3 universe and has the most potential for continuation.

 

 

if you include a bit of multi-universe theory,  it's easily done.  Star Trek reboot did it. This is scifi afterall.

[Panda]

We are in new galaxy, it's better to start with clean table than drag as big package along as ME3's endings are.

[Sugram84]

some (few) mentioned my spelling, ENG is not my mane lang, so for me Spelling errors are common

[10K]

not Troll, how come talking about how i feel & think about it makes me Troll?
Troll is some1 who talks BS for no reason, for fun
 
also i said they should make Syn ending cannon, so when Andromeda starts it shows MC ship getting hit by the energy wave from Syn ending, what changed all life

Well they're not making any ending canon. Everything will be moved to Andromeda, which mean assuming they do make another ME it will take place in Andromeda. They will never have to deal with the endings. And I bet they never will.

[TurianSpectre]

It does seem a bit stupid when youve played all three games for nothing in them to matter, but i guess they will just go along with the destroy ending as however far in the future the game is set, the whole shepard story would basically be legend by that time anyway

[Saladinbob1]

ME3 decisions didn't matter in ME3, no reason why Bioware would make them matter in ME4.

[AlanC9]

I literally starting this line of conversation with you in the back on my mind, Alan. You never disappoint.

Thanks. Neither do you.

You can watch all 3 endings on YouTube. The proof is in the pudding. It doesn't really matter if you accept or deny the facts. The facts are the facts. The wording is objectively present tense. None of it is past tense. None of it has happened.

The move from "the wording" to "none of it" depends on a hidden assumption, though, and I don't care to make it.

That being the case, can you prove that any of it actualizes?

Wasn't trying to. As you no doubt remember, I think deception theories are evidence-proof, so there's no point arguing about them that way.

How can Samara reunite with her daughter if she's in some out in the middle of nowhere star cluster with a population of 1 (Falere herself) with no relay network?

Better check your map again.

How does Wrex and Grunt get back to Tuchanka overnight (Grunt still has baby plates)?

Even assuming that isn't just the artist being sure that everybody recognizes Grunt, how many years = overnight. Do we have figures on plate development?

How long do you figure it will take to rebuild planets that have been reduced to rubble (no infrastructure), then research mass relay technology and replicate it then fly to each relay in the network one by one repairing them to make a path to any given world?

I don't know. Neither do you. But yeah, I'll bet Tali never sees Rannoch again.

And that's why Andromeda gives the players the ability to embrace their fantasies in regard to ME3. Even if those fantasies aren't in line with the actual game lore or story. For me the MEHEM will have to do as the canon ending. See?

No argument from me. Fantasize away if it makes you happier.

[mat_mark]

ME3 decisions wont matter in ME4??? WTH http://www.gamespot....-/1100-6441040/, endings have to matter!!! like if u chose mix human & machine, synthesizes ending then hole galaxy is... so all humans are to, so they half to mention it, talk about in game about how it changed their life, before u finish creating char it asks which ending u chose & world is slightly different depending on ur choice, but cause u explore far away galaxy then as i said slightly different, at least its mention in dialogues, that BS & i don't mean the talk is, BS is if they make it so nothing u made in ME3 doesn't matter, endings have to matter!!! that makes me think of not buying the game, a free copy maybe

 

its nice if in char creation u can chose 1 from all endings & wold is effected by what u chose, no Me3 save needed, u just answer a question

 

what else did you expect? Bioware decided to go to Andromeda precisely to avoid the choices and consequences of ME3

[Arcian]

syn ending is the most interesting from all of them anyway

What's so interesting about a blatant disregard for logic and common sense? Not to mention spitting in the face of sci-fi.

[Bizantura]

Like the ignore of choises, no.

Te best option to go forward, yes.

[themikefest]

I'd be pretty annoyed if we got some bastard hybrid of synthesis and control, which I feel would be the likeliest choice if we were stuck with Shepard's influence for all time.

I wouldn't want that to happen. I would choose destroy to have another game in the Milky Way

 

[themikefest]

yes there was, all mechanic Sentient life was destroyed/killed, cause they are not organic doesn't mean its not a life & that their feelings are not real

I'm I suppose to care about that? No. I usually have the geth destroyed on Rannoch. Either way, I see no genocide when choosing destroy.

[SKAR]

How about no. Synthesis ending was awful, and it was especially condescending to EDI and Legion character. They were learning what it ment to be individuals themselves. They slowly grew and learned what it ment to be alive. Then here comes synthesis to erase all that growth, making it all pointless. Synthesis was an abomination, nothing more

What? Synthesis made them fully alive. I would rather choose control. At least they get to live and the Reapers become our fleet.

[SKAR]

What's so interesting about a blatant disregard for logic and common sense? Not to mention spitting in the face of sci-fi.

Did you really just use common sense and logic? what disregard? I would like a full explanation as to why you think that. Seriously I'm curious.

[SKAR]

I think we can all agree that we don't like synthesis because there's nothing future in it. Sure we advance through technology and every one but bioware whoever wrote the endings needs to be sent to Ramsay Bolton so he could have his knob cut off.

[nfi42]

I think we can all agree that we don't like synthesis because there's nothing future in it. Sure we advance through technology and every one but bioware whoever wrote the endings needs to be sent to Ramsay Bolton so he could have his knob cut off.

 

That assumes there is nothing more to learn,  not likely.

 

In any case all three endings that star child allows us are stupid. Annihilation from the DLC is the best option.