445 réponses à ce sujet

[Arshei]

It's funny how you try to talk like Vivienne though. No wonder you have the same ideas with her. Do you idolize her? 

 

Not at all, I hated her, but I realized that I am just like her, curious.

[Almila_Lavellan]

Not at all, I hated her, but I realized that I am just like her, curious.

 

Yeah, very funny. Bet you could replace her. Same morals, ideas and all.

[Arshei]

Yeah, very funny. Bet you could replace her. Same morals, ideas and all.

 

Why thank you, maybe in the next game you can play the naive mage supporter who end up killed by an abomination.

[Catilina]

Yeah, very funny. Bet you could replace her. Same morals, ideas and all.

Morals? Where?

[TheKomandorShepard]

Yeah, very funny. Bet you could replace her. Same morals, ideas and all.

Damn, I haven't seen self-righteousness for a while.You should start a cult you could do that for the rest of your life.

[Dabrikishaw]

It's fine with me if you disagree with my assessment. Call it biased, unbalanced, or flat-out wrong, but your insistence on calling it disingenuous tells me that you don't know what that word means.

I'll cop to that.

[Almila_Lavellan]

Why thank you, maybe in the next game you can play the naive mage supporter who end up killed by an abomination.

 

Well, at least I would have principles

Damn, I haven't seen self-righteousness for a while.You should start a cult you could do that for the rest of your life.

 

Self-righteousness? Ha! You're funny bunch. I'm not self-righteous or something. I just don't like using people on principle. Of course you're welcome if you'd like to use people. Just don't claim you two know the lore better than us since you just recently told Vivienne was married.

[Voidinist]

Morals? Where?

 

At least she never wanted to sell a former slave back into slavery and she never blew up a Chantry for her agenda.

 

oh wait a minute who does that remind me of

[Catilina]

At least she never wanted to sell a former slave back into slavery and she never blew up a Chantry for her agenda.

 

oh wait a minute who does that remind me of

Arshei blew up a Chantry and wanted to sell a slave? S/He is a troll, but... it is hard to believe ...

[Arshei]

Arshei blew up a Chantry and wanted to sell a slave? S/He is a troll, but... it is hard to believe ...

 

Really is it hard to believe?

[Almila_Lavellan]

I like how people mention the bad things mages do but don't give a damn about the bad things templars do. Such objectivity.

[Catilina]

Really is it hard to believe?

Now, so that they you asked ... I'll think about it.

[Catilina]

I like how people mention the bad things mages do but don't give a damn about the bad things templars do. Such objectivity.

Because of the Templars is so normal. And they are knight, who protect the peolpe, including mages (from themselves). And they teach the mages to good manners. And where their place. This is very important, and very kind of them.

[Arshei]

I like how people mention the bad things mages do but don't give a damn about the bad things templars do. Such objectivity.

 

Templars can put their sword down and their powers aren't controlled by demons.

[Almila_Lavellan]

Templars can put their sword down and their powers aren't controlled by demons.

 

Yeah, except they don't put their damn swords down and tranquilize mages because of some stupid letters. It's okay though amirite?

[Arshei]

Yeah, except they don't put their damn swords down and tranquilize mages because of some stupid letters. It's okay though amirite?

 

It isn't okay!, they should torture the mage and then make him tranquil, they are missing all the fun!

[TheKomandorShepard]

Self-righteousness? Ha! You're funny bunch. I'm not self-righteous or something. I just don't like using people on principle. Of course you're welcome if you'd like to use people. Just don't claim you two know the lore better than us since you just recently told Vivienne was married.

Yes you definitely are considering your moral posturing.I know lore better than you i mean amount of your mistakes is quite high, for an example on exalted march, mages possession and chantry controling kingdoms.You know what is analogy right?I never claimed Vivienne was married but pretty much pointed that the purpose of marriage is the same as we deal in case of Viviene.

 

 

I like how people mention the bad things mages do but don't give a damn about the bad things templars do. Such objectivity.

Because Templars aren't walking bombs and don't bother rest of the society unless mage is involved?

[thesuperdarkone2]

It isn't okay!, they should torture the mage and then make him tranquil, they are missing all the fun!

Funny how it's the Templar supporters who attract the lunatics

[Almila_Lavellan]

It isn't okay!, they should torture the mage and then make him tranquil, they are missing all the fun!

 

Yes you definitely are considering your moral posturing.I know lore better than you i mean amount of your mistakes is quite high, for an example on exalted march, mages possession and chantry controling kingdoms.You know what is analogy right?I never claimed Vivienne was married but pretty much pointed that the purpose of marriage is the same as we deal in case of Viviene.

 

 

Because Templars aren't walking bombs and don't bother rest of the society unless mage is involved?

 

I can only imagine what would happen if you two were controlling the world. You would kill every different/ill person on sight. It's funny how you see mages as bombs. You sure you played after DA 2? You look like you're stuck in DA 2 logic where every mage was able to turn into abominations just in seconds.

[Arshei]

I can only imagine what would happen if you two were controlling the world. You would kill every different/ill person on sight. It's funny how you see mages as bombs. You sure you played after DA 2? You look like you're stuck in DA 2 logic where every mage was able to turn into abominations just in seconds.

 

They forgot that in DA:I, but that doesn't mean mages aren't bombs, strange that you say that after you claimed to know more lore than me, and in lore mages are way lot powerful than in gameplay, same with blood mages and abominations.

[TheKomandorShepard]

I can only imagine what would happen if you two were controlling the world. You would kill every different/ill person on sight. It's funny how you see mages as bombs. You sure you played after DA 2? You look like you're stuck in DA 2 logic where every mage was able to turn into abominations just in seconds.

I can tell you what would happen if i was controlling the world, there would be efficiency and order.That is just your wishful thinking, i have no desire to kill people im a problem solver, and it is just in case of mages it is best solution.I did and i still remember mage almost blowing up world twice in dai, Connor , Broken circle, Qunari mage trying to destroy the world, Tevinter magisters trying to brainwash whole world into slaves and many others.

[Almila_Lavellan]

They forgot that in DA:I, but that doesn't mean mages aren't bombs, strange that you say that after you claimed to know more lore than me, and in lore mages are way lot powerful than in gameplay, same with blood mages and abominations.

 

They didn't "forget" it. They tried to give reasons for people to like Templars more than mages in DA 2 which worked. Also Kirkwall's Veil was already thin. Of course there would be more abominations. Demons didn't need to possess people in DA:I since they freely roamed around.

I can tell you what would happen if i was controlling the world, there would be efficiency and order.That is just your wishful thinking, i have no desire to kill people im a problem solver, and it is just in case of mages it is best solution.I did and i still remember mage almost blowing up world twice in dai, Connor , Broken circle, Qunari mage trying to destroy the world, Tevinter magisters trying to brainwash whole world into slaves and many others.

 

What I don't like that you generalize mages just like that. I accept there were good templars such as Ser Thrask but you're unable to accept there were good mages.

[thesuperdarkone2]

I can tell you what would happen if i was controlling the world, there would be efficiency and order.That is just your wishful thinking, i have no desire to kill people im a problem solver, and it is just in case of mages it is best solution.I did and i still remember mage almost blowing up world twice in dai, Connor , Broken circle, Qunari mage trying to destroy the world, Tevinter magisters trying to brainwash whole world into slaves and many others.

So there should be a solution, perhaps final to the Mage question?

[TheKomandorShepard]

What I don't like that you generalize mages just like that. I accept there were good templars such as Ser Thrask but you're unable to accept there were good mages.

Too bad, reallity hits you hard bro in case of mages there is very little room for an error.You make same mistake that almost every pro-mage when talking to me, you assume that it is about mages being good or evil, all i care they are dangerous and they are dangerous regardless of their morality, it is almost factor irrelevant here.

 

 

So there should be a solution, perhaps final to the Mage question?

Yep, safety of the world is more important than a lives of the few.

[Almila_Lavellan]

Too bad, reallity hits you hard bro in case of mages there is very little room for an error.You make same mistake that almost every pro-mage when talking to me, you assume that it is about mages being good or evil, all i care they are dangerous and they are dangerous regardless of their morality, it is almost factor irrelevant here.

 

 

Yep, safety of the world comes over a lives of the few.

 

Well, I think templars are dangerous too. They can do whatever they like to mages. But do go on about how everything I say is irrelevant. I'm sure you'll get somewhere eventually.