Just going to start this long post by saying that closing this place down and deleting it despite the wealth of knowledge and helpful players ready to help new ones shows how disconnected Bioware is with its fandom. This is good, useful stuff. It would be such a colossal waste to dispose of it. There is no good reason for it. Have they acknowledged this point at all?
Man, they so could have turned it around for me after Trespasser by making a DA4 or DA:I 2 or whatever that continues the story from Trespasser without randomly changing the protagonist. If they had I would have had renewed hope. MEA is the first BioWare game since I first started playing BioWare games that I haven't followed the development of, talked and speculated about, etc...I don't know what it's about or when it's set or anything about it. I saw part of one trailer for it like a year ago (it was before a youtube video) the only thing I remember about it was that it used a Johnny Cash song and I loves me some Johnny Cash (you can't manipulate me with Johnny Cash BioWare!). My reaction to ME3 was strong enough to neatly sever my love of the series and the combination of DA2, DA:I, and throwing out the stuff set up in trespasser coupled with killing off the BSN has finally nudged me off the edge with DA as well. The really sucky thing is that with Fallout 4 and likely all games in the future, Bethesda has gone away from the things I like in a game to a more mass market appeal as well. Now the only thing I have left is Telltale. There aren't any other random companies making games I like (well there is choiceofgames.com's text games but I've played all the ones I was interested in). Over the last several years there have been fewer and fewer games coming out that I like and I think it might be almost time for me to give up gaming entirely but I need something else to replace it lol.
It feels like we're being flushed down a toilet by BioWare 
I feel for ya. Bioware-style games are by far my favourite, and naturally, only Bioware makes them
I like other RPGs too, but I just like Bioware's style (so far, anyway) the best. So it makes me very sad whenever they do something I don't like, because I can't just play a dozen other games like theirs.
And I for got to respond to this part yesterday, so:
I've become way too gloomy and bitter and would pretty much be a detriment to any new BioWare related community I joined.
I don't think so ![=]](https://lvlt.forum.bioware.com/public/style_emoticons/default/sideways.png)
Speaking really honestly I just think that Bioware is mostly just like the conventional "hero story," they don't really have a proper "nerd story" (lots of non-PC humor/jokes etc) that would really possibly inspire the hero writers and stuff.
I don't really understand what this means. And as I'm not a fan of humour at the expense of a group or person, and have liked most of the humour in past Bioware games, I think that's okay.
They never had mine for Andromeda.
Bioware seem to want to go into the shooter genre, even the controls of Dragon Age: Inquisition felt far more shooter than they should have been.
The problem is that they aren't that good at it. ME3 gets praise for its combat but compare that to even the first Gears of War (same game engine used on both series, so a fair comparison) and it's blown completely out of the water.
I don't see things the same way. What did ME3 having good combat do? It made the game more fun. It wasn't the reason our RP options were lessened or anything like that. Inquisition having "shooter controls" similarly didn't affect its narrative.
And again I have to disagree that they aren't good at it. ME3MP is phenomenal, in my opinion. It's on par with my best times in Halo and Battlefield (haven't played Gears). It was ME3's saving grace, as much as it could be saved. But different strokes and all that.
With Bioware Montreal making Andromeda, I think it's likely it will have awesome combat/multiplayer, but I don't think that will affect how good the story is one way or the other.
:nods:
Style matters
Which brings up another important point about Bioware's future means of interacting with its public. Up until now, the representatives have, with one stellar exception, been poorly dressed. Jessica Merizan dressed well. She got it. Everyone else just threw on random bits of contemporary clothing and called it a day. If you want to know why the mage hats were so unsatisfactory, look at how the people responsible for them dress.
The fashion was certainly questionable; I only liked a few armour sets in DA:I and some of those were just imported from DA2. But by far more egregious was the hair. (Hey, these are the last days!)
Seriously, I have to wonder if the people at Bioware ever see women outside of their office. You know, like in public or on the internet and stuff. Because I can't figure out how they could, yet simultaneously think that what we got in DA:I was good or appealing to most people. And the more "masculine" styles were nearly as bad, of course.
Just in case anyone needed reminding, here are all the "styles" in Inquisition. There are 28 of them. 13 are bald or nearly bald. Almost half. 10 either have male-pattern-baldness, sideburns, or both. That's 10 out of 28 that can instantly be considered masculine and not feminine, despite supposedly having gender-neutral options. Of course, that was just PR to make it seem like they were being progressive and to try to cover up the fact that neither gender has nearly enough options. What "gender-neutral hair" should mean, is that they made a bunch of lovely options for male characters, made a bunch of lovely options for female characters (in no particular order), then let all of them be used by both. It does not mean making some masculine ones and a few feminine ones, combining them, and calling it a day 
In addition, they couldn't think that maybe, just maybe, they should have things like sideburns in the Facial Hair section (crazy idea), something that already exists, and keep it off hairstyles. That way we don't have to groan at our Lady Inquisitors having them (or lowering the number of usable options even further), and our Lord Inquisitors can choose whether to have them, instead of being forced to with some styles and forced not to with others. Dumb. And none of that even addresses the quality of the styles! I'll leave that out since it's subjective, but I only like 2 styles and refuse to use 1 because sideburns.
All of that is hardly fair, but for some reason unfathomable to me, it took quite a few tweets to convince Mike Laidlaw that there might be a problem with that. Seriously. They're that out-of-touch with us, and that adverse to accepting even the simplest and most valid criticism. They're just so... stubborn! Defensive. Since I like that word today, it's really irksome.
Yeah. Take that 
Andthatandthatandthat.
So there, there's my last rant about hair here, probably. Felt good 