As for my "pointless need" to bring Anita Sarkeesian into this discussion, the reason she was brought in is because she sits on the Twitter Trust and Safety Coucil as its head. I used her as a point of reference to represent people who wish deny people their either God given or Constitutionally given right to freedom speech and expression. The fact that she is part of that body is not a "conspiracy theory", it's a damn fact. Now I know people who have delicate eggshell like psyches have a hard time taking facts but that is something they are going to have to get over, and pretty soon might I add.
It's easy to label something "toxic" because it doesn't fit the narrative, but truth is often neither kind nor cuddly soft. And I will continue to drag anyone as example into an open forum for debate,(which is what this is and neither Twitter or Facebook are not) as much as I damn well please. I will "drag" anyone who attempts to circumvent my constitutionally protected right to free speech into any discussion, because Its legal, because if they were attempt it in real life, unfortunately it's still illegal "drag" them into oncoming traffic. Have a great day!
That's not how the world works my friend.
First off, you don't have freedom of speech in the way you think you do. Historically and philosophically, there is limits to what you can say or face legal action- the old social contract theory which is the willing allowance of a government to take away some freedoms in exchange for security and safety of the country. It is literally what the United States is founded on.
Proof of this, well, I am sure you have heard of the "fire in a crowded building" example, but let's do another in that same vein, can you openly call someone a racial slur in public without repercussions? Realistically you can maybe get away with it, but legally you can be arrested for that in the United States. That is how the social contract works, the founding fathers have set that up as part of the mandate for the Articles of Confederation and later, the Constitution. They also have a caveat; if the government abuses their power you have the right to rebel against them.
Remember that point for a second.
So now, to address what you said, Sarkeesian is on the Twitter counsel thing, that is a fact. But that's the only fact you presented. See, what power does Sarkesian really have and how has she used it? Has there been a mass censuring of speech on twitter, or outright bans of people for what they say? Or is it still full of folks who shout from the rooftops or troll people in 120 characters on all sides?
I would argue the latter, along with people posting porn and **** talking in general, but that's what I see from time to time for some reason. I have weird friends.
The issue that is a conspiracy theory is the belief that she is trying to censor anyone on twitter. Even if she did, then all you need to do is not only leave twitter, but go for different forms of social media where she is not in charge and her ideology has no power. If we follow the social contract, if she abuses her position people have that right to rebel against it.
You don't rebel in anticipation however. Sarkessian may be a terrible educator and an opportunistic video maker, but she is also not stupid, she can't control everything and the minute she does, she is gone one way or another.
So truthfully, you really have no reason to bring her up except your own fear of her, unless you truly believe her to be someone who restricts free speech, which she doesn't. She just calls for censuring speech, not censorship. You dragging her into this is a poor example, because not only is she irrelevant, it doesn't help your case which is not only baseless, but also filled with fear over fact, id say.
And one more thing, before you try to drag me into something, just know that you can say whatever you want if you really like. I will just choose to not listen, because frankly you are likely wrong in your assertions regardless of what I say and I don't feel like schooling the irrational on here anymore.
As an aside, the way people are trying to use history here is kind of nice, it makes me happy since I am actually a trained historian in that regard, so carry on folks.