wizardryforever wrote...
I was very generous with the 10%, and really, it shouldn't take more than one hour maybe two to get all the resources you need. This is really nothing if you spread it out.
Once again you use terms associated with something that's to be avoided if possible, you shouldn't get that feeling in the first place.
wizardryforever wrote...
What qualifies something as work? Is planet scanning really so onerous that you just can't stand it? Really? Because you've got some very skewed perceptions of what work entails.
Me?! Oh, that has nothing to do with me, I googled a solution for this nuisance about 5 sec after It started to ****** me off. I thought people here wanted to suggest a new "economy" system for ME3, not argue if it's "really bad" or "not THAT bad".
wizardryforever wrote...
Everything can be a problem if people are stupid. People can spill coffee on them and badly burn themselves. Then they can claim that the label never said it would be hot, sue the coffee company and win. Now everything that might be mildly hot must have a "CAUTION: HOT" label on it. Why, because something that should not have ever been a problem got blown out of proportion by a stupid person to the point that it became a problem. The same applies to planet scanning. Do you honestly expect to scan planets rated "poor" or "depleted" and get any real reasources out of them? Do you think you'll need 10 million iridium over the course of the game in which almost all upgrades only cost at most 25,000? Why scan the whole freakin galaxy? That's when people have problems with it.
That's a false analogy by someone who is either narrow minded or manipulative. You're welcome to google for the legal precedents that made certain warning labels necessary.