Opinions on Geth after ME2?
#1
Guest_yf2489_*
Posté 30 janvier 2010 - 10:17
Guest_yf2489_*
#2
Posté 30 janvier 2010 - 10:19
#3
Posté 30 janvier 2010 - 10:28
Edit: If it isn't obvious, I chose to save the heretic geth and rewrite the virus, even though that option is really just as bad as destroying them (brainwashing = bad).
Modifié par blasphemae, 30 janvier 2010 - 10:30 .
#4
Posté 30 janvier 2010 - 11:00
#5
Posté 30 janvier 2010 - 11:04
#6
Posté 30 janvier 2010 - 11:05
#7
Posté 30 janvier 2010 - 11:08
#8
Posté 30 janvier 2010 - 11:27
Asai
Modifié par asaiasai, 30 janvier 2010 - 11:28 .
#9
Posté 30 janvier 2010 - 11:43
Also people who destroyed the geth really made the wrong choice, Your actually not brain washing a race, by doing so it's more of a cure, because fallowing the reapers would only lead to their destruction. Also when they are reintorduced to the regular Geth it makes them all stronger, because now they have information on the reapers. Not only that your giving them a new lease on life. It's better they live because it's better for the geth as a whole.
Modifié par Jigero, 30 janvier 2010 - 11:49 .
#10
Posté 30 janvier 2010 - 12:00
The Heretic Geth essentially went through the synthetic version of indoctrination, knowing the reapers tendency to be very thorough I figured that by using the heretics as tools, they would place sleeper programs in them. If the Heretics were reintroduced into Geth society as a whole you will see the same effects as when indoctrinated members of the prothean race did to the rest of the protheans. The sleepers activate, everyone gets ****ed over.
In the case of the Geth, the sleepers would then proceed to rewrite the entire geth race to serving the reapers, a potential ally that just wants to develop and be at peace with its creators, would become nothing more then kill machines. By preventing that from happening by destroying the Heretics, I have protected the Geth race as a whole. Even if it was a very renegade choice to do so. But since I am working on my second ME2 file, I plan to use the rewrite, so I can see how it goes both ways anyways.
Modifié par TankHunter678, 30 janvier 2010 - 12:01 .
#11
Posté 11 février 2010 - 08:07
Would I advise brainwashing a human colony that was not indoctrinated, but still worshiping and helping the reapers? No, I would not reprogram them and erase who they are. So I would have to uphold that moral completely. Personally I think they got the Paragon/Renegade thing completly backwards with this choice.
Forced acceptance is not freewill, it is indoctrination.
#12
Posté 11 février 2010 - 08:11
Thing is Geth don't see morality as we do and never will.
Like Legion said, killing them would be quicker, but by re-writting them, the heretics would remain in hiding until ready to return. Meaning it's going to be a slow and involving process, not like a switch that is imediatly turned off.
To them killing them off, could be seen as bad, remember that data is what makes them what they are. By returning them, yes you force them, but you also give the geth, knowledge, experience, and understanding as they are both separate but now they rejoin, adding their data to the other geth. Will it make the geth change, not likely.
But it will give them knowledge about the reapers, experiences about what the heretics were doing and what they did do. You have to look at them as a computer, as organic beings, yes it's a horrible act. But for them, it's an empowering act, and maybe the best of the two choices. Could make the difference in them figuring how to help against the reapers.
Modifié par IceTitan, 11 février 2010 - 08:18 .
#13
Posté 11 février 2010 - 08:14
I thought, how cool would it be if Legion were that original geth that Tali ambushed to get the evidence against Saren, and he somehow survived the damage of having his memory core removed, but it had changed him somehow?
The things I get in my head…
#14
Posté 11 février 2010 - 08:30
Don't get me wrong, I still love shooting heretics in the face.
#15
Posté 11 février 2010 - 08:33
Here's an analogy that I would make with humans. There are bacteria inside humans that affect the production of certain neurotransmitters. Some of them do it by breaking down food that's used to make these neurotransmitters, some of them actually make the neurotransmitters themselves. Some of these bacteria affect the production of neurotransmitters that improve your mood and allow you to cope with stress like dopamine and endorphin. If these bacteria were to all die off, there is a good chance that you'll spiral into a suicidal depression and kill yourself. If I had killed these bacteria in someone and they committed suicide, would you say that I brainwashed the person to kill him/herself?
#16
Posté 11 février 2010 - 08:38
If I had killed these bacteria in someone and they committed suicide, would you say that I brainwashed the person to kill him/herself?
If the Geth operated through emotions like that, you may have a slight point IF we were talking about mood or emotions, but we are not talking about altering their mood.
We are taking about forcing them to agree with a point of view that was discussed over. They chose the reapers because of the technology they provided. That is theirs, they own that choice, to take it away and force them to agree with said point of view IS indoctrination.
#17
Posté 11 février 2010 - 08:42
I would have liked to have him/it around a bit before having all those epic questions and decisions shoved at me.
Modifié par Kileyan, 11 février 2010 - 08:43 .
#18
Posté 11 février 2010 - 08:44
Meltemph wrote...
If I had killed these bacteria in someone and they committed suicide, would you say that I brainwashed the person to kill him/herself?
If the Geth operated through emotions like that, you may have a slight point IF we were talking about mood or emotions, but we are not talking about altering their mood.
We are taking about forcing them to agree with a point of view that was discussed over. They chose the reapers because of the technology they provided. That is theirs, they own that choice, to take it away and force them to agree with said point of view IS indoctrination.
You're missing the point. It's not about the emotion, it's about manipulating a factor involved in decision making. Emotions and moods are mechanisms in humans that affect how we make decisions. If I can manipulate someone's emotions then I can increase or decrease the chances that they'll do something. The Geth probably don't have emotions but they have some kind of mechanism that helps them make decisions. If I make alterations to that mechanism then it can change the decisions they make. That kind of change in the Geth would be analogous to me manipulating emotions or moods in humans.
#19
Posté 11 février 2010 - 08:50
I think it's because legions systems are 573 in favour of rewrite and 570 in favour of blowing up the base. Maybe a paragon shep should have gone with "democracy"?
#20
Posté 11 février 2010 - 08:51
The Geth probably don't have emotions but they have some kind of mechanism that helps them make decisions. If I make alterations to that mechanism then it can change the decisions they make. That kind of change in the Geth would be analogous to me manipulating emotions or moods in humans.
So you are saying they made that choice not of their own freewill? They were not forced into it and they were not malfunctioning when they made that choice. Legion made that clear at the Geth base when he was confused about the heretics use of tactics and monitoring. He said they understood their stance and said straight up that their decision wasnt considered "wrong" for the heretics, but was considered wrong for them.
You cont compare the 2 races like that. Legion even says they have no hardware, only software. The way they come to consensus is completely different from us.
#21
Posté 11 février 2010 - 08:53
#22
Posté 11 février 2010 - 08:59
#23
Posté 11 février 2010 - 09:05
#24
Posté 11 février 2010 - 09:06
Meltemph wrote...
The Geth probably don't have emotions but they have some kind of mechanism that helps them make decisions. If I make alterations to that mechanism then it can change the decisions they make. That kind of change in the Geth would be analogous to me manipulating emotions or moods in humans.
So you are saying they made that choice not of their own freewill? They were not forced into it and they were not malfunctioning when they made that choice. Legion made that clear at the Geth base when he was confused about the heretics use of tactics and monitoring. He said they understood their stance and said straight up that their decision wasnt considered "wrong" for the heretics, but was considered wrong for them.
You cont compare the 2 races like that. Legion even says they have no hardware, only software. The way they come to consensus is completely different from us.
If they truly are completely different then the "brainwash" analogy wouldn't work either.
If you're going to make a "brainwashing" analogy then you're comparing Geth thinking processes with human thought processes. If they think in a completely different way than humans then neither the "brainwashing" analogy nor the analogy I gave would work.
Also, I never said that the rogue Geth were robbed of their free will when they made that choice. I'm saying that Legion's virus isn't brainwashing because it would not actually take away the rogue Geth's free will, it would simply change the conditions of that free will. I used the emotions analogy because it's easy to understand. People's decisions change based on your emotions. Certain moods make people more aggreeable. It is possible to modify a person's mood to a point where they become extremely agreeable to certain suggestions. Such an alteration would not actually take away somene's free will, it would simply modify their decision making to such a degree that you can get what you want.
#25
Posté 11 février 2010 - 09:09





Retour en haut






