Which ending should a possible sequel of DA use? (Spoiler)
#1
Posté 30 janvier 2010 - 04:07
Will Bioware just take one of the endings and spin the tale onward? I hope not, I always hated this as I always had the feeling that "my story" wasn't right and didn't even happen.
I think it would be much better to set the sequel of DA about 30-50 years into the future. The new game would scan the last savegame of DAO and import the choices etc. like in Mass Effect 2.
So you create a new character and hear about the deeds the hero of DAO did and the world is shaped a bit according to what the hero did in DAO. this way "your tale" could continue.
I think that Bioware maybe plans to use Morrigan and the child for the sequel. So what if there was no child? There could be a legend that Morrigan found another Warden with whom she had a child.
A bigger problem is the soul of the Archdemon. What if it wasn't lured into the baby? I think this is too big a plot device to be just ignored.
#2
Posté 30 janvier 2010 - 08:11
If they don't go with a canon ending then perhaps it would be wise to narrow down the variations that will carry through(sacrifice, ritual etc) and leave everything else in the dark(some companions for example).
#3
Posté 30 janvier 2010 - 11:37
#4
Posté 31 janvier 2010 - 02:44
#5
Posté 31 janvier 2010 - 02:52
1. choose a canon ending
or
2. separate the sequel from DAO so much in setting that the choices you made in the first game wouldn't come up at all (different country, set centuries in the future, stuff like that).
The way I see it, scanning your saves from from the first game isn't a good option. The reason is simple: if Morrigan's godbaby carries over into the next game, either from a save scan or a canon ending, it can and absolutely should be core to the story. But if that's the case, then Dragon Age 2 would have to basically have two stories, one focused on the godbaby, and one focused on something else, which would be an excessive amount of work.
Personally, I'd go with a canon ending; the whole godbaby angle has too much potential to pass on.
#6
Posté 31 janvier 2010 - 06:49
#7
Posté 01 février 2010 - 02:04
#8
Posté 01 février 2010 - 03:26
#9
Guest_distinguetraces_*
Posté 01 février 2010 - 04:02
Guest_distinguetraces_*
#10
Guest_distinguetraces_*
Posté 01 février 2010 - 05:55
Guest_distinguetraces_*
e.g., Warden sacrificed himself, leaving Alistair as king. A few years later (it will be revealed at some point in the sequel) a mysterious woman appeared and captured the king's heart. They married, but she disappeared soon after, leaving Alistair a broken man....
Modifié par distinguetraces, 01 février 2010 - 05:56 .
#11
Posté 01 février 2010 - 06:17
#12
Posté 01 février 2010 - 06:24
The two choices, imo, are:
1. Continuing the same campaign. Same main character (if survived), same player choices (including which companions are with you). Easiest way to do this is having your character and the companions still with her/him in another land. That way, the geopolitical decisions would have a far smaller impact, possibly minor sidequests or some NPC interactions. This is the preferred choice for me.
2. New campaign in the same setting. I would rather this option to either be an auxiliary game (a non-sequel, but set in the same world) or made after option 1 has run its course. Different time (could be in another age, thus have a different title <Blank> Age) or same time in another place.
This game is one of the closest games to a PnP Campaign, and only a bad Gamemaster would completely ignore the choices made in the first campaign in the setting in making the second campaign.
#13
Posté 01 février 2010 - 06:29
SusanStoHelit wrote...
Heh, IF they go canon ending, human noble (female) on the throne with Alistair.
I think Alistair as king just feels right. Alistair+Anora and Alistair+Female Human Noble both seemed like they could be the canon endings. Though Anora kind of seems out of place so i'd favor the other ending.
Human Noble origin just screams canon ending.
#14
Posté 01 février 2010 - 07:46
There are pretty much three ways I see this working without a canon ending. The only truly major split that I can foresee causing plot issues would be whether or not you did the ritual with Morrigan, and caused her impregnation. They could create a supermassively elaborate game, where one takes you down the path of facing her Old God Vessel Child, and one that takes you down a different road -- essentially this would mean two entirely different stories contingent upon your major decision in the climax. Or, they could have a prologue section of the sequal that forces you to come to the same point regardless of your major ending -- either Morrigan gets another demon baby somehow, or she loses it the one she's got, so that no matter how you ended the first game the new story forces you to come to a certain place to begin the story of the sequal. Finally, they could do what I assume they're doing with Awakening:
Thing is... if you died... well, you can't play your PC anymore, and ultimately your story ends there, and treat it like game over. If you didn't die, then that means you did do the ritual with Morrigan. So, assuming that Morrigan having the child is vital to the plot of the sequal, they could basically say, "you can't import your choices unless you survived -- if you're dead, you can't continue adventuring as that PC anyways, so either import a surviving character, or play this 'canon ending' version of the story if you want to create a new character altogether for DA2."
#15
Posté 01 février 2010 - 08:13
Human male, sacrifices himself. Hardened Alistar and Anora Rule.
Human Noble Male, Ritual, king with Anora
Human Noble Female, Ritual, Queen with Alistar
#16
Posté 01 février 2010 - 08:21
Auridesion wrote...
Thing is... if you died... well, you can't play your PC anymore, and ultimately your story ends there, and treat it like game over. If you didn't die, then that means you did do the ritual with Morrigan. So, assuming that Morrigan having the child is vital to the plot of the sequal, they could basically say, "you can't import your choices unless you survived -- if you're dead, you can't continue adventuring as that PC anyways, so either import a surviving character, or play this 'canon ending' version of the story if you want to create a new character altogether for DA2."
I didn't die nor did I do the ritual. Let's just say Loghain redeemed himself that fateful night.
I really love the ending I got on my last play through, and I just can't imagine continuing with a different one. For Awakening, our decisions will obviously carry over, but down the road in, say, DA2, it will be difficult to avoid a canon ending... I hope Bioware opts for being extremely vague about what happened in Ferelden, so we can keep the illusion that our stories mattered.
#17
Posté 01 février 2010 - 09:02
Regarding God baby - either Morrigan gets it from you, or after the final onslaught she goes off to find another Arch Demon. If the Darkspawn can find a sleeping Old God and taint it, I'm sure Morrigan can find one too.
Screw canon ending - they won't do it I'm sure they would rather start in another land with the codex history of Ferelden (that has fallen to Darkspawn, lead by their Queen Morrigan.)
#18
Posté 01 février 2010 - 09:31
NyackDarkSoul wrote...
Seems to have been a lot of discussion on this one. Personally I would go with DA2 being a few generations down the line - easy - problems sorted. Game exports data from old save. Main character is descendant of savegame main character (even if you died, you could well have procreated beforehand - plus if you romanced someone they could be the other parent.)
I'd definitely like to retain my current PC in the next game - a lot of the choices within DA shape not only the world but your character themself, ditching the character you've spent so long crafting just to do it all over again seems a waste when there's so much potential for a continuation. A Shadows of Amn relocating of the PC & selected cast members would probably be in order, with new characters entering the fray in the new lands. On the topic of the ending - I'd rather they went with one overarching "canon ending" - almost definitely Dark Ritual, with minor variations depending on your choices, gender etc.
It seems to me that some players would rather erode some potentially major plotlines in any potential sequel than simply concede to a canon story. Far better to have a single, strong and cohesive plotline than to try to account for every possible player choice - people should be satisfied that the choices they make have an impact within this game space rather than asking for the impossible in trying to cater for every possible scenario. Some things need to be out of the player's control to create a powerful narrative.
Modifié par Terra_Ex, 01 février 2010 - 09:32 .
#19
Posté 01 février 2010 - 09:35
Think of it this way...
Maybe it goes as far as 30 years in the future playing as a new character, and you never get a mention of who was the previous king/queen but you will assume it was the one you chose in DAO.
You meet Morrigan's son/daughter down the line. If you did the ritual then you know who is the father and even if you didn't you will just assume Morrigan found another volunteer(or should I say sucker?) to impregnate her.
This method will simplify things... but I'm not too fond of going so far into the future with a new char so for now I'm just gonna hold my breath and wish for a continuation.
Modifié par blademaster7, 01 février 2010 - 09:36 .
#20
Posté 01 février 2010 - 05:36
#21
Posté 01 février 2010 - 05:56
That's the only logical choice from a military standpoint, as nobody has ever tried a counter attack against the darkspawn. They just let them retreat and build back up to continue a seemingly endless cycle which makes me question the intelligence of Thedas' military commanders(with exception to Kardol, and the Legion of the Dead).
I'd love to see a human/dalish/dwarven/magi/templar "Crusade" descend on the darkspawn in response to their "Blight". Just look at Luthias Dwarfson who had the right idea all along.
#22
Posté 02 février 2010 - 12:30
I agree that in a game that turns so much on character choice a canon ending would be for me a real let down and I am sure that Bioware will be much cleverer than that.
#23
Posté 02 février 2010 - 05:06
A canon ending for a sequel would COMPLETELY ruin DA:O and the sequel. Imagine in SWtOR if you did your character's choices for the story just how you wanted it, then Bioware released the next story for you character, and it assumes all the choices in the first were the exact opposite than what you did. Oh, and instead of, say, a female twi'lek, your character was now a male human . . .
#24
Posté 02 février 2010 - 05:27
Of course one can't expect the game to pick up where it left off depending on your player choices? Would it not be a bit too easy doing whatever your main quest is if your a general of Denerim's army? Dragon in the way? Throw more men at it!
#25
Posté 02 février 2010 - 05:45
-Morrigan gets the godbaby
-Alistair's king
-Dragon Age 2 takes place 20-30 years in the future, in a new country (Orlais, Tevinter, wherever)
-You play as an entirely new character (who doesn't even necessarily need to be Grey Warden), who will be dealing with our Old God, all growed up (maybe as a villain, maybe not, but still key to the story).





Retour en haut






