89 réponses à ce sujet

[Kreid]

Saren was an awesome villain, a tangible threat Shepard could go against one on one, I'm fine with the Collectors in ME2 but here's hoping we get another humanoid antagonist in ME3, at least for the first half of the game

[Spam Eelam]

So, I'm picturing Thane with a monocle and a top hat except more deliciously evil...



/signed



even better if he/she is an elcor

[LadyLuminary]

Quick! Someone get Michael Wincott to sign up! He'd be a great villain for ME3

[Sphaerus]

Spam Eelam wrote...

So, I'm picturing Thane with a monocle and a top hat except more deliciously evil...

/signed

even better if he/she is an elcor

Malignant proclamation:  You cannot escape my wrath, Shepard.  The galaxy will tremble under my might.

Spiteful command:  Din, get over here and help me with this rifle.

[J_chambers]

Whatever you do Bioware, just don't make the next antagonist Shepard's alter ego.

[IRMcGhee]

I'm betting Admiral Morrigan's going to ruffle a few feathers in part three.

[sarahrp]

Admiral Morrigan sounds like........ he needs to stay at the citadel

[Subject 01]

All Bioware needs to do is put themselves in a position of a sexy bad****. that is twice as smart as the unpersuasive Illusive Man (urgh) and just as cocky as Sheperd. Bioware seems to overlook that not all people are open, naive, and narrow as most of the villans they've created.   

Modifié par Subject 01, 12 février 2010 - 05:13 .

[sarahrp]

Shepard is made to look invincible

[sarahrp]

Saren should have never been killed. Bioware tries to kill off the wrong people. Too many people r able to die. y were we given a chance to even kill wrex, that still didn't make sense to me. The mission on virmire didn't seem that difficult that everyone couldn't survive, but i can go through the omega relay and bring everyone home even the ones without guns. i don't understand.

[Subject 01]

sarahrp wrote...

Saren should have never been killed. Bioware tries to kill off the wrong people. Too many people r able to die. y were we given a chance to even kill wrex, that still didn't make sense to me. The mission on virmire didn't seem that difficult that everyone couldn't survive, but i can go through the omega relay and bring everyone home even the ones without guns. i don't understand.

Saren's death was done perfectly.  His goals and personality did not match.  You'd think someone who is capable of running high-risk ops would be smart enough to know when he's being played. 

Modifié par Subject 01, 12 février 2010 - 05:31 .

[sarahrp]

Devoraj wrote...

sarahrp wrote...

Shepard is made to look invincible

And others cannot be portrayed as such?  Shepard is a strong protagonist, but the supporting characters (much less any of the NPCs) lacked any REAL pull.        

exactly, its like no one can kill someone with the same gun like shepard, no one can do biotics like shepard can. He's out of control. I wouldn't have a problem with shepard being that powerful if bioware was going to end Mass effect after 3. But their making a franchise out of this. I don't think a shepard legacy is good for the mass effect universe.

[Subject 01]

Sphaerus wrote...

Why does every hero need to be some kind of weird, dysfunctional BFF with nemeses? I like the reapers as they are. They're cold, impersonal, and ludicrously evil. There's no grey area, they can not and will not be reasoned with, the only way things can end is with the absolute destruction of all galactic civilisation or with the absolute destruction of the reapers.
True, total, purposed evil is the best kind of evil.

Just because you cannot do something doesn't mean it's not possible.  People in the "grey area" can be reasoned with.  It's happened.  You just stupid and narrow enough to assume they can't.   

Modifié par Subject 01, 12 février 2010 - 05:36 .

[sarahrp]

Subject 01 wrote...

sarahrp wrote...

Saren should have never been killed. Bioware tries to kill off the wrong people. Too many people r able to die. y were we given a chance to even kill wrex, that still didn't make sense to me. The mission on virmire didn't seem that difficult that everyone couldn't survive, but i can go through the omega relay and bring everyone home even the ones without guns. i don't understand.

Saren's death was done perfectly.  His goals and personality did not match.  You'd think someone who is capable of running high-risk ops would be smart enough to know when he's being played. 

But now we are chasing mindless bugs who are being played. I felt no threat by the collectors. I even blew up their secret human weapon like it was a fire ******, T'was nothing to a G. Saren was much better than that he was an in your face villain

[Sphaerus]

Subject 01 wrote...

Sphaerus wrote...

Why does every hero need to be some kind of weird, dysfunctional BFF with nemeses? I like the reapers as they are. They're cold, impersonal, and ludicrously evil. There's no grey area, they can not and will not be reasoned with, the only way things can end is with the absolute destruction of all galactic civilisation or with the absolute destruction of the reapers.
True, total, purposed evil is the best kind of evil.

Just because you cannot do something doesn't mean it's not possible.  People in the "grey area" can be reasoned with.  It's happened.  You just stupid and narrow enough to assume they can't.   

And that's what pisses me off.

I DON'T LIKE TO REASON WITH EVIL.  The whole, obvious point of that post was that that I LIKE the fact that the reapers can not and will not be reformed.  I don't like horse's ass "hay lets b frends" endings.

[Subject 01]

Sphaerus wrote...

Subject 01 wrote...

Sphaerus wrote...

Why does every hero need to be some kind of weird, dysfunctional BFF with nemeses? I like the reapers as they are. They're cold, impersonal, and ludicrously evil. There's no grey area, they can not and will not be reasoned with, the only way things can end is with the absolute destruction of all galactic civilisation or with the absolute destruction of the reapers.
True, total, purposed evil is the best kind of evil.

Just because you cannot do something doesn't mean it's not possible.  People in the "grey area" can be reasoned with.  It's happened.  You just stupid and narrow enough to assume they can't.   

And that's what pisses me off.

I DON'T LIKE TO REASON WITH EVIL.  The whole, obvious point of that post was that that I LIKE the fact that the reapers can not and will not be reformed.  I don't like horse's ass "hay lets b frends" endings.

Nobody said it had to end that way.  There is no such concept as pure "good" and "evil"  in the real world.  Bioware has portrayed that the best with their games.  You mentioned earlier you don't like the concept of "grey".  Would you say that the Geth are pure evil? What of Legion?  What was Shepard doing if not reasoning with them?  Bloody Hell.       

Modifié par Subject 01, 12 février 2010 - 05:51 .

[hex23]

Charismatic villain? What is this "Twilight"? I like things the way they are. The Reapers are cold, brutal, and can't be reasoned with.

Besides, people seem to forget this is a trilogy. Saren was/is the main villain, along with the Reapers. The second game is happening because of things he set in motion.

This is a different game but it's the same story. We don't need a "main villain" to trade verbal barbs with every game.

Having said that, it's sort of obvious at some point The Illusive Man will become a "villain".

Modifié par hex23, 12 février 2010 - 06:18 .

[sarahrp]

hex23 wrote...

Charismatic villain? What is this "Twilight"? I like things the way they are. The Reapers are cold, brutal, and can't be reasoned with.

Besides, people seem to forget this is a trilogy. Saren was/is the main villain, along with the Reapers. The second game is happening because of things he set in motion.

This is a different game but it's the same story. We don't need a "main villain" to trade verbal barbs with every game.

Having said that, it's sort of obvious at some point The Illusive Man will become a "villain".

No No u don't have to kill him in the first game, and the illusive man sucks. The shadow broker is much more interresting.

[Skilled Seeker]

Saren wasn't good enough for you?

[sarahrp]

Skilled Seeker wrote...

Saren wasn't good enough for you?

Saren was good actually, I just think if he was in the second game, we would have had better things to do while getting ready to fight the collectors. The story could have been better. In my opinion