Aucune réponse à ce sujet

[Ironruster]

Don't normally do a lot of posting in forums about games but I thought I would have a go at it. Snice people are having issues with design choices thought i would write out my thoughts.

ME1 

Pros

-Good story not biowares best but good
-Good voice acting and characters
-Good mix of RPG and Shooter
-Fun
-Great replay value(did at least 7 plays of it)
-Cool weapons and armor
-Good ending could have never had a sequel and been a good stand alone game
-Elevator ride(I enjoyed them)
-Good ending

Cons

-The mako (feels like a sloppy warthog controls from halo as well as the off center camera was odd)
- The many mostly boring side quests due to the mako, boring plants and 4 or so base setups
- The inventory screen( not sure what happened here KOTOR and Jade empires equipment screens were way better) lot good weapons due to forgeting to clear junk out
-Cover system wasn't good at all felt tacked on
-Graphical probs

On to ME2

Pros

-Good story(not as good as the first, probaly because its the middle game and is setting up for the end.)
-Good ending( was going in expecting some dumb ending ex. AC2)
-Really great characters
-Great Charioteer interaction and back story
-Great looking game
-No Mako
-No crappy inventory screen
-cool looking loading screens
-weapon and ship upgrades
-cool new normandy
Cons

-Too many loading screens
-Miss elevators
-Odd mission complete screens
-Too few weapons and armor 
-Too few sidequests
-Would have liked more of old characters from ME1( Anderson, Council, Crew, Archni)
-Connections to last game involve too many emails
-Text is way too small on older tvs
-The ammo system should have been a cross between the new and old one. Should have had unlimited ammo still and over heated, but give you the option to carry a limited amount extra heat syncs so you could keep firing if y you needed too 

Overall i think ME2 is the better game.

Thats the end of my 2 cents.

Modifié par Ironruster, 30 janvier 2010 - 08:45 .