Keepers and Rachni
#1
Posté 30 janvier 2010 - 11:39
#2
Posté 30 janvier 2010 - 11:40
It seems the Reapers have a a thing for bugs.
It was mentioned they got rid of all the junk parts of the DNA and just modified/left the bare essentials.
Modifié par packardbell, 30 janvier 2010 - 11:40 .
#3
Posté 30 janvier 2010 - 11:42
The Protheans were modified to become the Collectors, a race the Reapers would use to harvest/weaken the next set of inhabitants, much different role between the two, so stands to reason that they were modified in different ways.
Still, Rachni and Keepers look very similar.
#4
Posté 31 janvier 2010 - 12:05
#5
Posté 31 janvier 2010 - 12:12
Regardless, the similarities in appearance between Keepers and Rachni are too much for me to simply throw that idea away, at least until Bioware explains where the Keepers really came from
#6
Posté 31 janvier 2010 - 12:21
#7
Posté 31 janvier 2010 - 12:23
Arthain wrote...
The Rachni live underground, it is VERY possible that the Reapers simply missed a few of them. It's also possible that the Keepers and Rachni are both modifications of a different species, one was designed to maintain the Citadel, the other to act like the Protheans, as sort of a Vanguard to help ease the way for the Reapers to move in.
Regardless, the similarities in appearance between Keepers and Rachni are too much for me to simply throw that idea away, at least until Bioware explains where the Keepers really came from.
That's a bit of a stretch. The Keepers have apparently been at the Citadel through all (at least all recent) cycles of reaper destruction. In ME1 someone said that the keepers were probably the first intelligent species that the Reapers absorbed/modified/destroyed. The Rachnii have only been around in the past 50,000 year cycle.
#8
Posté 31 janvier 2010 - 12:27
#9
Posté 31 janvier 2010 - 12:29
Maybe every 50,000 years they come in and wipe them out along with all the other races but can never finish them off because of the fact that they're better at hiding than any other species out there.
The Rachni could have been there with the Protheans as well, it was said that the Protheans had spread across the entire galaxy, but it never said they occupied every world in every system in in part of the galaxy, only that they were the only 'main' dominant race, and the only one to occupy the Citadel.
The Rachni are almost as mysterious as the Reapers themselves, more so probably since I believe we actually know 'more' about the Reapers than we do the Rachni, in relation to long-term history I mean.
#10
Posté 31 janvier 2010 - 12:32
Arthain wrote...
Actually, you're all making the assumption that the Rachni have only been around in the past 50,000 years, you're also making the assumption that the Keepers have been in the Citadel from the beginning. You're also making the assumption that the Reapers haven't 'tried' to destroy the Rachni 10,000 times already.
Yeah, that's a pretty darn easy assumption to make.
If the KROGANS could destroy the Rachni, you don't think the REAPERS could do it?
#11
Posté 31 janvier 2010 - 12:35
#12
Posté 31 janvier 2010 - 12:39
Arthain wrote...
Actually, you're all making the assumption that the Rachni have only been around in the past 50,000 years, you're also making the assumption that the Keepers have been in the Citadel from the beginning. You're also making the assumption that the Reapers haven't 'tried' to destroy the Rachni 10,000 times already.
Maybe every 50,000 years they come in and wipe them out along with all the other races but can never finish them off because of the fact that they're better at hiding than any other species out there.
The Rachni could have been there with the Protheans as well, it was said that the Protheans had spread across the entire galaxy, but it never said they occupied every world in every system in in part of the galaxy, only that they were the only 'main' dominant race, and the only one to occupy the Citadel.
The Rachni are almost as mysterious as the Reapers themselves, more so probably since I believe we actually know 'more' about the Reapers than we do the Rachni, in relation to long-term history I mean.
You're a very shameless promoter of this theory. The theory is a little far-fetched. We make assumptions based on Negative Presemption. Until something is proven we, legally and otherwise, have the right to deny its ramifications. As the accuser (you accusing the rachni of having ancestral connection with keepers) you have the burden of proof and the bottom line is that there is no proof. Our 'assumptions' are logical deductions based on the canonic lore of the game.
The Reapers spend centuries obliterating a species and they only missed like 12 scientist Protheans. I highly, highly doubt that the Rachni have been avoiding Reaper destruction all this time.
It is pretty apparent that the Protheans were alone. Given their study of human development on Mars and their likely cultural uplift of the hanar.
#13
Posté 31 janvier 2010 - 03:16
And how about the similarities in appearance between humans and asari? Or hanar and jellyfish? Or Reapers and cuttlefish? They're two insectoid species. They don't bear any other similarities than that. They're as similar as any of the dozens of bipedal humanoid species in Mass Effect.Arthain wrote...
Regardless, the similarities in appearance between Keepers and Rachni are too much for me to simply throw that idea away, at least until Bioware explains where the Keepers really came from.
The Keepers, as shown, are integral parts of the Reaper's plan of luring in unsuspecting civilisations to the Citadel. A plan which has worked flawlessly, over and over, for millions of years. Why would the Keepers be a recent addition? And as others have said, how exactly could the Reapers fail, for millions of years, to wipe out the rachni when the krogan could do it? Rachni queens live underground, if worst comes to worst, they could have just obliterated the entire planet(s) if they wanted to. You seem rabidly attached to this theory for no real reason. They're both insectoid and have no other similarities, but that's okay, because the differences between them are because the Reapers did it, right? And we don't know of any way the rachni could have possibly survived a Reaper invasion, but that's okay, the Reapers might just have missed them 10,000 times. I bet they would have managed to wipe them out too, if it weren't for those pesky kids, right?
You have no proof, and the things you're saying to support it sound wildly improbable. Believe it if you want, because yeah, there's no proof you're wrong. Just lots and lots of common sense.
#14
Posté 31 janvier 2010 - 03:22
#15
Posté 31 janvier 2010 - 03:27
#16
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 12:08
#17
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 02:58





Retour en haut






