What was the purpose of a human reaper?
#76
Posté 21 décembre 2010 - 03:46
#77
Posté 21 décembre 2010 - 07:15
There is however, a good level of certainty that this was done after the devs asked themselves "What's the single most ridiculous boss that will garner the most underwhelming and unsatisfying reaction from our fans?"
"hmmmm"
"I got it! An unfinished HUMAN reaper that for some reason the player can kill with the weapons they have ON them! GENIUS!!!"
Seriously, when in ME1 we had to fight Saren/Sovereign I felt like I do sometimes when Im watching a really intense movie that "on the edge of your seat" feeling. When I got to ...whatever the human larvae reaper thing is....all I could do was go
-.- ...wtf?
Horrible, HORRIBLE boss experience.
Unless they did it to keep our expectations low for ME3's boss experience, in that case it was genius.
Edit: Not to mention that in ME1 the Saren/Sovereign boss combo was an ever constant threat looming over your head with tangible sensations of foreboding doom and epic face off.
While in ME2 I never even caught on that the collector "general" was actually being controlled by a reaper called Harbinger. And I kinda wish that I never figured it out because when I did, it made me wish I hadnt killed Sovereign so I could have been confronted by a reaper that said something more than "ASSUMING CONTROL...THIS HURTS YOU"....ugh.
But the point is, that this confusionary and lackluster boss interaction provided no ground work for the introduction to the final boss, leaving you ultimately underwhelmed and unimpressed. It kinda felt like a curtain reveal...TADAAAA its a Human reaper! Cool huh?....no?...not even a little?
Modifié par BiancoAngelo7, 21 décembre 2010 - 07:20 .
#78
Posté 21 décembre 2010 - 07:24
they wanted to absorb human biological and technolgical distinctiveness then wipe us out
#79
Posté 21 décembre 2010 - 07:33
BiancoAngelo7 wrote...
There's no real definitive purpose given so anything we say will be speculation.
There is however, a good level of certainty that this was done after the devs asked themselves "What's the single most ridiculous boss that will garner the most underwhelming and unsatisfying reaction from our fans?"
"hmmmm"
"I got it! An unfinished HUMAN reaper that for some reason the player can kill with the weapons they have ON them! GENIUS!!!"
Seriously, when in ME1 we had to fight Saren/Sovereign I felt like I do sometimes when Im watching a really intense movie that "on the edge of your seat" feeling. When I got to ...whatever the human larvae reaper thing is....all I could do was go
-.- ...wtf?
Horrible, HORRIBLE boss experience.
Unless they did it to keep our expectations low for ME3's boss experience, in that case it was genius.
Edit: Not to mention that in ME1 the Saren/Sovereign boss combo was an ever constant threat looming over your head with tangible sensations of foreboding doom and epic face off.
While in ME2 I never even caught on that the collector "general" was actually being controlled by a reaper called Harbinger. And I kinda wish that I never figured it out because when I did, it made me wish I hadnt killed Sovereign so I could have been confronted by a reaper that said something more than "ASSUMING CONTROL...THIS HURTS YOU"....ugh.
But the point is, that this confusionary and lackluster boss interaction provided no ground work for the introduction to the final boss, leaving you ultimately underwhelmed and unimpressed. It kinda felt like a curtain reveal...TADAAAA its a Human reaper! Cool huh?....no?...not even a little?
I must say that I agree with this comment. At the very end of the when shep says something like "not any reaper, a human reaper" I must admit that i giggled alittle, it just fell abit flat.
I do agree with other posters about humans being a bit special as I remember the trinket that the consort gave to shep in ME1 and the little story about early man and the protheans at that pyramid thingy.
#80
Posté 21 décembre 2010 - 07:54
Modifié par franzos87, 21 décembre 2010 - 07:55 .
#81
Posté 21 décembre 2010 - 09:04
And then they mop up and...feed.
#82
Posté 21 décembre 2010 - 09:55
#83
Posté 21 décembre 2010 - 10:08
This is basicaly how I feel. Only I wouldnt have put it so kindly.BiancoAngelo7 wrote...
There's no real definitive purpose given so anything we say will be speculation.
There is however, a good level of certainty that this was done after the devs asked themselves "What's the single most ridiculous boss that will garner the most underwhelming and unsatisfying reaction from our fans?"
"hmmmm"
"I got it! An unfinished HUMAN reaper that for some reason the player can kill with the weapons they have ON them! GENIUS!!!"
Seriously, when in ME1 we had to fight Saren/Sovereign I felt like I do sometimes when Im watching a really intense movie that "on the edge of your seat" feeling. When I got to ...whatever the human larvae reaper thing is....all I could do was go
-.- ...wtf?
Horrible, HORRIBLE boss experience.
Unless they did it to keep our expectations low for ME3's boss experience, in that case it was genius.
Edit: Not to mention that in ME1 the Saren/Sovereign boss combo was an ever constant threat looming over your head with tangible sensations of foreboding doom and epic face off.
While in ME2 I never even caught on that the collector "general" was actually being controlled by a reaper called Harbinger. And I kinda wish that I never figured it out because when I did, it made me wish I hadnt killed Sovereign so I could have been confronted by a reaper that said something more than "ASSUMING CONTROL...THIS HURTS YOU"....ugh.
But the point is, that this confusionary and lackluster boss interaction provided no ground work for the introduction to the final boss, leaving you ultimately underwhelmed and unimpressed. It kinda felt like a curtain reveal...TADAAAA its a Human reaper! Cool huh?....no?...not even a little?
I cant tell if Harbringer wanted to have sex with Shepard or wanted to kill her.
“We are Harbinger.” "Impressive Shepard." "Submit now." “Why do you resist us, Shepard?” “You cannot resist.”
Later on at his place... "I know you feel this." "This hurts you."
Modifié par Vaenier, 21 décembre 2010 - 10:08 .
#84
Posté 21 décembre 2010 - 10:11
Gambit One wrote...
I must have missed something. Why were the reapers making a human reaper? It seemed kind of random.
To inspire youtube videos, like this one:
www.youtube.com/watch
Modifié par TheNexus, 21 décembre 2010 - 10:11 .
#85
Posté 21 décembre 2010 - 11:21
Vaenier wrote...
This is basicaly how I feel. Only I wouldnt have put it so kindly.BiancoAngelo7 wrote...
There's no real definitive purpose given so anything we say will be speculation.
There is however, a good level of certainty that this was done after the devs asked themselves "What's the single most ridiculous boss that will garner the most underwhelming and unsatisfying reaction from our fans?"
"hmmmm"
"I got it! An unfinished HUMAN reaper that for some reason the player can kill with the weapons they have ON them! GENIUS!!!"
Seriously, when in ME1 we had to fight Saren/Sovereign I felt like I do sometimes when Im watching a really intense movie that "on the edge of your seat" feeling. When I got to ...whatever the human larvae reaper thing is....all I could do was go
-.- ...wtf?
Horrible, HORRIBLE boss experience.
Unless they did it to keep our expectations low for ME3's boss experience, in that case it was genius.
Edit: Not to mention that in ME1 the Saren/Sovereign boss combo was an ever constant threat looming over your head with tangible sensations of foreboding doom and epic face off.
While in ME2 I never even caught on that the collector "general" was actually being controlled by a reaper called Harbinger. And I kinda wish that I never figured it out because when I did, it made me wish I hadnt killed Sovereign so I could have been confronted by a reaper that said something more than "ASSUMING CONTROL...THIS HURTS YOU"....ugh.
But the point is, that this confusionary and lackluster boss interaction provided no ground work for the introduction to the final boss, leaving you ultimately underwhelmed and unimpressed. It kinda felt like a curtain reveal...TADAAAA its a Human reaper! Cool huh?....no?...not even a little?
I cant tell if Harbringer wanted to have sex with Shepard or wanted to kill her.
“We are Harbinger.” "Impressive Shepard." "Submit now." “Why do you resist us, Shepard?” “You cannot resist.”
Later on at his place... "I know you feel this." "This hurts you."
Oh God lol, I didnt even think about that, I havent done a playthrough yet as a femshep, but when I do thats gonna make it preeeetty awkwaaard...
I use those lines on de ladies all the time...
"hey babe...SUBMIT NOW....THIS HURTS YOU...I KNOW YOU FEEL THIS..."
(of course Im not reporting here how many restraining orders I have against me though...)
Man Sovereign makes me miss Sovereign soooo much.
#86
Posté 21 décembre 2010 - 11:28
"PRESERVE SHEPARD'S BODY IF POSSIBLE."
#87
Posté 22 décembre 2010 - 12:58
Shepard, Avatar of the Human Reaper?didymos1120 wrote...
Shall we now consider the unfortunate implications of this line?
"PRESERVE SHEPARD'S BODY IF POSSIBLE."
You know, I've always had a personal suspicion that the Collectors/Reapers would have brought Shepard back via a Lazarus Project had they successfully recovered it from the Shadow Broker. They certainly would have the technology to do it, and cost wouldn't be a factor (especially when the people you'd owe credits to would be dead in five years regardless).
Of course, they'd just put the control chip/indoctrination in at creation.
#88
Posté 22 décembre 2010 - 01:03
I was under the impression that he would have been the Nazarus of the Human Reaper. The leader of that nation so to speak.Dean_the_Young wrote...
Shepard, Avatar of the Human Reaper?didymos1120 wrote...
Shall we now consider the unfortunate implications of this line?
"PRESERVE SHEPARD'S BODY IF POSSIBLE."
You know, I've always had a personal suspicion that the Collectors/Reapers would have brought Shepard back via a Lazarus Project had they successfully recovered it from the Shadow Broker. They certainly would have the technology to do it, and cost wouldn't be a factor (especially when the people you'd owe credits to would be dead in five years regardless).
Of course, they'd just put the control chip/indoctrination in at creation.
#89
Posté 22 décembre 2010 - 01:06
#90
Posté 22 décembre 2010 - 01:09
I don't think Nazara was a singular individual: Legion identifies Sovereign always and consistently as a gestalt intelligence. Nazara as a self-identifier would most likely be a collective self-identification. Not a 'I am Nazara,', as there was no 'I', but 'We are Nazara.'
Given that each Reaper is a nation, and a species, in and of itself, it may have been in the same sense of
'We are Human.'
#91
Posté 22 décembre 2010 - 01:22
Basicly sayed, reapers making human looking spaceship is idiotism beyond anything.
Modifié par Lumikki, 22 décembre 2010 - 01:23 .
#92
Posté 22 décembre 2010 - 01:24
Its really no less sensible than squid/cuttlefish designs for space travel.Lumikki wrote...
How human looking reaper walks in space? Does the human reaper move by farting?
Basicly sayed, reapers making human looking spaceship is idiotism beyond anything.
#93
Posté 22 décembre 2010 - 02:17
#94
Posté 22 décembre 2010 - 09:15
In some ways yes. But as aerodynamic, the squid was alot better, if we talk spacecraft what will descend into the atmosphere. In space as in vacuum, the form also has meaning, because the mass balance of the thrust means something. In both cases human form is really bad, only thing where human form is better, is walking in planet surface.Dean_the_Young wrote...
Its really no less sensible than squid/cuttlefish designs for space travel.Lumikki wrote...
How human looking reaper walks in space? Does the human reaper move by farting?
Basicly sayed, reapers making human looking spaceship is idiotism beyond anything.
Modifié par Lumikki, 22 décembre 2010 - 09:16 .
#95
Posté 22 décembre 2010 - 09:19
Gambit One wrote...
I must have missed something. Why were the reapers making a human reaper? It seemed kind of random.
Well, they've been interested in humans for a while, see? Especially James Cameron.
#96
Posté 22 décembre 2010 - 09:48
Yeah, humanity had the attention of the Protheans from the very beginning. I'm thinking there's definitely something there waiting to be revealed...lawp79 wrote...
I do agree with other posters about humans being a bit special as I remember the trinket that the consort gave to shep in ME1 and the little story about early man and the protheans at that pyramid thingy.
Also, too many people keep saying "Oh, the Reapers obviously realized we are a formidable species and-" I feel like I need to interject right there and say "Wroooooooong". Dude, any time we've spoken to a Reaper they've said the same thing. Simply put, the Reapers just don't give a f***k. I don't think it's even in their "programming" to think of anything other than themselves as "formidable".
The human Reaper was for reproduction, purely. It was to destroy humanity's hope and uniqueness simultaneously. To ensure that they could read us like a book from the inside out. Dwindling our numbers and strengthening theirs, adding something of some use to their collective knowledge in an effort to keep the cycle going. To them this is all routine, mechanical, protocol. At least that's how I saw it. How they actually planned to use it is totally meaningless compared to what the human Reaper actually stands for in the story.
#97
Posté 22 décembre 2010 - 10:08
So after Sovereign screwed up, they went to plan B which was to use the Collectors.I believe the Reapers see humanity as the biggest threat to them, so by making a Reaper out of human colonists they would leave humanity that much more underpowered. Also they needed another Reaper more then anything to attempt to sneak in and take over the Citadel. I'm also guessing the Human Reaper probably would have been to indoctrinate humans easily and was probably going to indoctrinate parts of the Alliance fleet and launch a surprise attack on the Citadel with the Collectors and Geth Herectics.
#98
Posté 22 décembre 2010 - 10:21
There's no reason to 'compromise' to a squid form either, so 'better than a human form' is meaningless. If they cared/wanted maximum combat efficiency, they wouldn't be squids either, or any animal.Lumikki wrote...
In some ways yes. But as aerodynamic, the squid was alot better, if we talk spacecraft what will descend into the atmosphere. In space as in vacuum, the form also has meaning, because the mass balance of the thrust means something. In both cases human form is really bad, only thing where human form is better, is walking in planet surface.Dean_the_Young wrote...
Its really no less sensible than squid/cuttlefish designs for space travel.Lumikki wrote...
How human looking reaper walks in space? Does the human reaper move by farting?
Basicly sayed, reapers making human looking spaceship is idiotism beyond anything.
You're making an argument of 'a giant robot lion is better than a giant robot human', which, while true, rather misses the point that a giant robot lion is still pretty darn stupid. It misses the point as much as, say, a middle school teacher saying 'I always wear a condom in class': yes, strictly speaking better than the alternative, but missing a rather important distinction about what the problem actually is.
#99
Posté 22 décembre 2010 - 01:52
Perhaps ME3 will actually show them what else the appendages can do and provide a funtional rationale for the squid-like design.
It could be the Reapers do not even know themselves: how much does a Reaper remember from it's prior existence as a species of individual sentients? Whatever reasons the creator species of the original Reaper may have had to choose such a design may be lost/irrelevant now.
Modifié par Flamewielder, 22 décembre 2010 - 01:52 .
#100
Posté 22 décembre 2010 - 06:10





Retour en haut






