I'm a little dissapointed that Conrad always says you shoved a gun in his face. But the fact of the matter is, its contrasted so heavly due to it being the only part of the game I don't like. Maybe the patch could be worked in when they update Cerberus with the Hammerhead?
Conrad Verner, when will an update fix him saying you chose the renagade option in ME1?
Débuté par
Shadowterm
, févr. 02 2010 09:49
-
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut
#2
Posté 02 février 2010 - 09:50
Lew717
-
- Members
- 161 messages
I think they didn't make an paragon treatment-resulted reaction in the first place.
#3
Posté 02 février 2010 - 09:51
izmirtheastarach
-
- Members
- 5 298 messages
Who cares. It makes no difference to the game at all. It is one line of dialogue. I hardly think this merits dev attention. If I don't get my free DLC because they are working on fixing silly nonsense like this, I will not be happy.
#4
Posté 02 février 2010 - 09:52
Kuari999
-
- Members
- 474 messages
izmirtheastarach wrote...
Who cares. It makes no difference to the game at all. It is one line of dialogue. I hardly think this merits dev attention. If I don't get my free DLC because they are working on fixing silly nonsense like this, I will not be happy.
No difference to you, you don't speak for EVERYONE though
#5
Posté 02 février 2010 - 09:52
Avissel
-
- Members
- 2 132 messages
We may never know, people have brought a couple of issues where choices seem to have transferred wrong and so far Nobody from Bioware was chosen to comment on any of them. I'm hoping these things will get patched at some point.
#6
Posté 02 février 2010 - 09:55
masterp1975
-
- Members
- 296 messages
Here's a thought. Verner is mentally unstable. If you took the paragon route, you posed for a picture while holding up your gun. Instability =/= solid memories. There is nothing wrong with how it plays out.
#7
Posté 02 février 2010 - 09:57
Kuari999
-
- Members
- 474 messages
masterp1975 wrote...
Here's a thought. Verner is mentally unstable. If you took the paragon route, you posed for a picture while holding up your gun. Instability =/= solid memories. There is nothing wrong with how it plays out.
See, here's the thing, if that explanation was actually somewhere in the game, wouldn't be so bad.
#8
Posté 02 février 2010 - 09:58
izmirtheastarach
-
- Members
- 5 298 messages
Kuari999 wrote...
izmirtheastarach wrote...
Who cares. It makes no difference to the game at all. It is one line of dialogue. I hardly think this merits dev attention. If I don't get my free DLC because they are working on fixing silly nonsense like this, I will not be happy.
No difference to you, you don't speak for EVERYONE though
I am going to put hundreds of hours into this game, and spend spare time discussing the finer point with people on these here forums. I am a hardcore, obsessive fan. But come one, we need a patch to fix one line if dialogue in a meaningless side quest? Please.
#9
Posté 02 février 2010 - 09:59
Avissel
-
- Members
- 2 132 messages
It was also claimed in an interview that he would remember how you treated him..but yeah...not so much.
#10
Posté 02 février 2010 - 10:00
WrexShepard
-
- Members
- 270 messages
I suspect it's a bug. I wouldn't be surprised if there was a line of code regarding how you treated him that was broken.
Something like ParagonActioncheck=Yes.
Still, you do kinda shove a gun in his face even with the paragon path. It's just pointing away from him.
AT A MERCHANT.
Something like ParagonActioncheck=Yes.
Still, you do kinda shove a gun in his face even with the paragon path. It's just pointing away from him.
AT A MERCHANT.
#11
Posté 02 février 2010 - 10:01
Wintermist
-
- Members
- 2 655 messages
izmirtheastarach wrote...
Who cares. It makes no difference to the game at all. It is one line of dialogue. I hardly think this merits dev attention. If I don't get my free DLC because they are working on fixing silly nonsense like this, I will not be happy.
It matters because it's part of the whole picture. It's not all about the main storyline. If BioWare tell you that your choices matter and that you should expect to see the result of them in the sequel they should do just that, right? Well, I guess in your world it's not interesting, but for others it is. So get off your high horse.
#12
Posté 02 février 2010 - 10:02
Wintermist
-
- Members
- 2 655 messages
izmirtheastarach wrote...
I am going to put hundreds of hours into this game, and spend spare time discussing the finer point with people on these here forums. I am a hardcore, obsessive fan. But come one, we need a patch to fix one line if dialogue in a meaningless side quest? Please.
No one said the other bugs didn't matter. They matter too.
#13
Posté 02 février 2010 - 10:03
Kuari999
-
- Members
- 474 messages
izmirtheastarach wrote...
Kuari999 wrote...
izmirtheastarach wrote...
Who cares. It makes no difference to the game at all. It is one line of dialogue. I hardly think this merits dev attention. If I don't get my free DLC because they are working on fixing silly nonsense like this, I will not be happy.
No difference to you, you don't speak for EVERYONE though
I am going to put hundreds of hours into this game, and spend spare time discussing the finer point with people on these here forums. I am a hardcore, obsessive fan. But come one, we need a patch to fix one line if dialogue in a meaningless side quest? Please.
Some of these side quests matter to people quite a bit, and its not just this one, there are a couple others with similar issues. It breaks the immersion for some people. It probably wouldn't just be one line that changes either, he'd probably act a bit differently in general. There is no excuse for trying to push your opinion on someone though by claiming its stupid because it doesn't bother you.
#14
Posté 02 février 2010 - 10:38
Water Bottle
-
- Members
- 19 messages
I heard the Besieged Base Quest (the Paragon Quest with drugged scientists) is still glitched and carries over as a massacre.
I saved all those people for nothing
I saved all those people for nothing
#15
Posté 02 février 2010 - 10:39
Axx Bytehoven
-
- Members
- 236 messages
If you shoot him the foot, there is a funny Galatic News story on Conrad later in the game on Illium.
#16
Posté 02 février 2010 - 10:40
ifanator
-
- Members
- 62 messages
he will get killed again if you choose the renegade option in ME 2, wonder he will be back in ME 3 from getting killed by a car like getting killed by turians earlier.
#17
Posté 02 février 2010 - 10:41
aaniadyen
-
- Members
- 1 933 messages
In 1 week, 4 days, 7 hours, 37.000562 minutes, 8.29 seconds.
#18
Posté 03 février 2010 - 01:06
JedTed
-
- Members
- 1 109 messages
It may seem like a small thing but i took issue with this aswell, i never pointed a gun in his face either. There wasn't even a dialog option to say that either.
If it's not a bug then maybe he used that picture to make it look like he had a run in with Shepard and survived but that may be a bit stretch.
I thought heard something about that while waking around illium. I saved all those scientis too and i was like "WTF?!?", sounds like somebody's got their sorces messed up.
Speakind of minor quests carring over, did anyone end up giving Emily Wong her exclusive interview? I got an email from her asking where i didn't contact her but i couldn't find her anywhere on the Citadel, just that pushy reporter that tries to slander your good name.
If it's not a bug then maybe he used that picture to make it look like he had a run in with Shepard and survived but that may be a bit stretch.
Water Bottle wrote...
I heard the Besieged Base Quest (the Paragon Quest with drugged scientists) is still glitched and carries over as a massacre.
I saved all those people for nothing
I thought heard something about that while waking around illium. I saved all those scientis too and i was like "WTF?!?", sounds like somebody's got their sorces messed up.
Speakind of minor quests carring over, did anyone end up giving Emily Wong her exclusive interview? I got an email from her asking where i didn't contact her but i couldn't find her anywhere on the Citadel, just that pushy reporter that tries to slander your good name.
