Orogenic wrote...
Cloaking_Thane wrote...
In the first game Shep, the best human soldier in the galaxy couldnt aim a sniper rifle or hit anything else 2/3rds of the time.
I love progression and char dev as much as the next person, but for a game involving guns where a soldier is already the Elite of the Elite it makes little sense to progress Accuacy of Stability
So once again, by your logic all combat soldiers are snipers? I thought it added a bit of realisim that your character had to "develop" familiarity with different weapon types to be skilled with them... and that spending points on these skills would take away other potential benefits. For instance, I liked the fact that you couldn't have an expert marksman who was also a master of conversation with maxed out charm.
To each his own.
All soldiers recieve basic training in sharpshooting, as well as the art of feild craft and reconaissance within a year in the military, all backgrounds for shepherd set him/her up as an elite and warworn soldier. The core differentiate between an experienced soldier is not the former value of sharpshooting, but the latter values of feildcraft, camoflauge and recon expertise.
Once again, you have no idea what you're talking about. I suggest you drop the pretentious know-it-all condescending attitude you put on yourself, and join a legitimate discussion, instead of calling everyone who disagrees with you flamers, and ignoring refutations of your points, or leave.
You're not championing your case to bioware that ME3 should cater towards your gameplay tastes by acting like a sophomoric douchebag, who dismisses any opposing point as a troll or a flame, while dishing out condescending remarks at the same time. If you'd like to prove me wrong, feel free to address the dozen of so perfectly valid points which you've dismissed as flames.
Orogenic wrote...
Orogenic wrote...
newcomplex
wrote...
Your literally imagining themes and complexity where
none existed.
Were you dropped on your head as a
child?
For the love of god, please look up delusional and apply
said definition to your above statement.
I'm leaving this
thread before my IQ starts to drop.
Have a nice day.
Specifically responded here.
I said he was being insulting, specifically by insinuating that I was delusional. I referenced the definition of
delusional and provided a specific example of his behavior. How could I respond in a more precise fashion?
No, I was not insinuating you were dillusional. Imaginings and Delusion carry different heft in the language we call english. Just because words are synonyms of each other does not mean they are analogues of each
other. When I say you are imagining things because of nostalgia, that in no way shape or form infers you are delusional. All civility on my part goes out the window when you suggest I was mentally damaged as a child, then flame me four consecutive posts, without actually referencing in any way shape or form my original points.
You've gotten people who actually agree with your core points to dislike your posts. Good job! That requires effort.
Second of all, regardless of your percieved level of insult, which clearly IS a delusion, because nobody seems to agree with you, debasing my argument because I "insulted you" (by saying you were imagining things), you fail to respond to my points on that basis alone. That is literally the textbook definition of the fallacy "Ad hominem"
Finally, as a previous poster posted, are you
DENYING that you imagined things? Because the fact that Tali only has one formal dialogue sequence is in no way shape or form a falsehood. That can only result in one logical conclusion. That you did, indeed,
imagine having more then one conversation with tali. I don't understand how I can put that any nicer.
You can of course, continue to flame me, say I'm insulting you, troll, whatever. The point is irrelevent to me. The point of a public forum isn't to gain smug self satisfaction from trying to insinuate you're more civil, more mature, and intellectually superior to everyone who disagrees with you, and to try to gain pleasure from that (rather pathetic) mode of thinking.
The point of this forum as it relates to physical events is its a means to shape public opinion, especially in regards to the development of ME3, and the public opinion about the state of ME2, and to try to influence bioware in those regards as well. (its also a place to socialize, but I don't think any of that is going on here lol). By acting like a pretentious douchebag, without actually addressing any of the concerns raised against your argument, all you're doing is ensuring none of your concerns are being looked at legitimately by bioware, or the community as a large.
Modifié par newcomplex, 03 février 2010 - 08:30 .
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut
