Dragon Age negative reviews : censored and deleted.
#76
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 08:18
*goes back to playing the game*
#77
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 08:23
#78
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 08:39
Great cutscenes with a lots hackandslash in between. Great stroryline and poor (exactly poor, i mean, not rich) gameplay.
So yes, perhaps it's the RPG of the year but it means only that companies wouldnt like to invest in RPGs and that theres no better ones. Which is a bit sad, but anyways... I still have fun with DAO, just not as "epic" as it was in advertisements.
Perhaps, future campaings will unveil whole potential of new setting.
#79
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 08:42
Great cutscenes with a lots hackandslash in between. Great stroryline and poor (exactly poor, i mean, not rich) gameplay.
So yes, perhaps it's the RPG of the year but it means only that companies wouldnt like to invest in RPGs and that theres no better ones. Which is a bit sad, but anyways... I still have fun with DAO, just not as "epic" as it was in advertisements.
Perhaps, future campaings will unveil whole potential of new setting.
#80
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 08:59
And I thought that NWN and BG are still played because great modding community, not because you could "coop play". The best mods for NWN are single player. And last time I checked DA is supposed to have Toolset, so I'm sure there will be plenty of interesting mods for DAwlcina wrote...
I am writing again, why I consider this game as "average":
1) COOP play, Bioware is stupid if they didnt add multiplayer to DA. Why ? It will make game playable 10 times longer ! Just have look at the Neverwinter Nights (1) - people are still playing over internet, modding comunity is working on their new mods. This is just fact. Each good multiplayer game lasts much longer. Single player ? - you will win 2 - 3 times and you will never return to game again.
#81
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 09:11
wlcina wrote...
Where did you get I am playing WoW ? I am not.
Because of the nerd rage?
#82
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 09:35
wlcina wrote...
Think about DA as rpg - the game is pushing you directly to the end. No chance for your own options / opinions and so on, that is not RPGish.
How is that true? There are usually multiple ways you can go about finishing quests. Like in Redcliff for one. Have you even played through the game once? And tried more than one origin?
#83
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 09:46
wow.. what great faults of this game...wlcina wrote...
I am writing again, why I consider this game as "average":
1) COOP play, Bioware is stupid if they didnt add multiplayer to DA. Why ? It will make game playable 10 times longer ! Just have look at the Neverwinter Nights (1) - people are still playing over internet, modding comunity is working on their new mods. This is just fact. Each good multiplayer game lasts much longer. Single player ? - you will win 2 - 3 times and you will never return to game again.
2) Tactics - there is ONE!! command action. I do not understand such this thing. Why just one ? This is called tactics ? horrible, just imagine they were at least 3, what a nice combos you can create.
3) User interface why on each side of my monitor, not ergonomic. You will have to run with you mouse here, then there, then there again.
4) Predefined paths , exploration killed. In RPG ? great ways to destroy one of great RPG elements.
... more are coming...
i honestly wish the game wouldn´t have been hyped that much, so there would be way less bored kiddie trolls like you on these forums.
#84
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 10:11
That's one of the best games ever and, while at this stage in my playthrough I think it is falling slightly short of that title, it's still a pretty decent game. Best RPG I've played since that, certainly.
#85
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 10:25
dragon age doesn't do that its just like BG and NWN with next gen flare.
#86
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 10:27
I am loving DA:O and I think it's one of the best rpg I have played in my life...
#87
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 11:09
#88
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 11:15
wlcina wrote...
Irxy wrote...
O rly? Please name those games then, maybe I missed some great rpgs on the market.wlcina wrote...
Its average game, there are plenty games like Dragon Age, but without marketing and advertisement.
The most closest to DA is Drakensang, then you should try Chrono Trigger and Final Fantasy 7, then you will see what ROLE PLAYING GAME is.
Drakensang is quite well-known (to me) and it definitely has many drawbacks. The story isn't very suspenseful, it's a traditionally linear game, you might call its aesthetic cheesy, its battle simplistic and unbalanced.... it just isn't so much of a burner. Chrono Trigger is 20 years old, or something like this. Now you'll say, no, it's 18,7 years old. Anyway, it's very, very old. And we're talking about games from the last 3 years at the very least. FF7 is perhaps not quite as old. But it still doesn't have the same high standards of realism, dialogs, complexity and choices and consequences as some slightly newer games. All in all, all your points are rather silly. Too bad.
#89
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 11:44
#90
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 12:07
#91
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 12:11
wlcina wrote...
Irxy wrote...
O rly? Please name those games then, maybe I missed some great rpgs on the market.wlcina wrote...
Its average game, there are plenty games like Dragon Age, but without marketing and advertisement.
The most closest to DA is Drakensang, then you should try Chrono Trigger and Final Fantasy 7, then you will see what ROLE PLAYING GAME is.
none of the games listed(except maybe chrono trigger) are rpg's. ff7 while an amazing game is more like a rts based cinematic experiance. and lol at drakensang
#92
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 12:43
wlcina wrote...
1) COOP play, Bioware is stupid if they didnt add multiplayer to DA. Why ? It will make game playable 10 times longer ! Just have look at the Neverwinter Nights (1) - people are still playing over internet, modding comunity is working on their new mods. This is just fact. Each good multiplayer game lasts much longer. Single player ? - you will win 2 - 3 times and you will never return to game again.
your comments: MMORPG / WoW, answer: No I dont want to play MMORPG, I want to play this game with friends, like I did with all previous Bioware RPG games I mentioned, I want to make balanced party with my 2-3 friends and want to have fun with game, - in current state as SP game, it loosing this great potential
-While co-op can make any game more fun, I really enjoy my single-player experience, like most Bioware RPGs. I have other games for multi-player and do not believe every game should have it. Plus, I like being able to take my time and actually enjoy the setting rather than rush to the next loot cache. That being said, hopefully in the future, there will be support and mods for anyone who wishes multi-player gameplay in the Dragon Age setting.
2) Tactics - there is ONE!! command action. I do not understand such this thing. Why just one ? This is called tactics ? horrible, just imagine they were at least 3, what a nice combos you can create.
- no one answered for that, do you think it is ok ? :-)
-This still doesn't make any sense as I have multiple slots for each character. Ten hours in and I had at least 3 for each party member. The amount of options you get is great to fully customize your party to play the way you want it to. There are a lot of tactics involved, and I can only guess you are just trolling with this statement, or haven't even tried to understand the depth of the system.
3) User interface why on each side of my monitor, not ergonomic. You will have to run with you mouse here, then there, then there again.
- for some ppl it is ok, I agree, what about consensus - make it drag and drop where you want it, that would be best for all.
-Yet another topic I can only guess you are trying to rouse debate on, but again, this makes no sense. The UI is very minimal, and practically no different than most hotbar related games out there. Inventory and other hotkey elements are all in their proper places. I play on a fairly big widescreen monitor and don't have any excess of running the mouse "here, then there, then there again." Also, with the UI elements, this kind of makes no sense with what you were saying.
4) Predefined paths , exploration killed. In RPG ? great ways to destroy one of great RPG elements.
your comments: play Morrowing (boring ? :-O) , I am not saying about extremly HUGE world.But about how the game is pulling your hand, and taking you where you have to be. I need some free space for me, I want to see here and there, there could be barricades, but not so close the predefined paths, you practically cannot move out of the way for a bit.
-Actually, the one topic I kind of agree with you on. Like almost all Bioware rpgs though, there is a pre-determined path. While the game does try to provide a sense of exploration, once you have "explored" an area, you kind of realize how limited the spaces really are. I like it in the fact that I know can explore, but not get overly distracted from the main setting. However, I can see those that want more of the "Elder Scrolls feeling" can be a bit disappointed.
#93
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 01:07
I would have agreed concerning trolling telling from the first post. But later he elaborated why he doesn't like the game. If your opinion differs: fine. But don't tell people to shut up just because you don't want to hear their pov.
Apart from that I myself am as happy as can be too that I'm finally getting a new game that's not offering a basic at best single player experience because the devs wanted to feed the MP crowd another game. It really follows in the footsteps of BG, IWD and such. And that's exactly what I hoped for. I'll wait before purchasing it though till I can be sure that it doesn't have any major issues. Not mentioning the lack of time to play atm.
#94
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 01:07
I would have agreed concerning trolling telling from the first post. But later he elaborated why he doesn't like the game. If your opinion differs: fine. But don't tell people to shut up just because you don't want to hear their pov.
Apart from that I myself am as happy as can be too that I'm finally getting a new game that's not offering a basic at best single player experience because the devs wanted to feed the MP crowd another game. It really follows in the footsteps of BG, IWD and such. And that's exactly what I hoped for. I'll wait before purchasing it though till I can be sure that it doesn't have any major issues. Not mentioning the lack of time to play atm.
#95
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 01:44
#96
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 01:47
People like the tc who think its average or crap are little more then attention seeking trolls.
and you know what they say bout trolls?
Dont feed them
#97
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 01:48
#98
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 01:50
wlcina wrote...
Baldurs Gate / Neverwinter Nihghts - that were RPG games. Dragon age ? its hack n slash with new "pause" option.
....Baldur's Gate was hack n slash with pause options...
I can only conclude you never played Baldur's Gate.
#99
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 01:50
imemoria wrote...
Yaggo wrote...
imemoria wrote...
I have the same opinion, on 360 the game is a shame. the graphics are bad because the xbox hardware was not respected and the game is a just a port from pc. game that are 3 or 4 years old are better looking. the combat is ankward, you keep dieing a lot because of the lack of strategy due to the lack of isometric view. that's the main reason the difficulty has been dumbed down on the console, btw. I was waiting for this game for so long, that's depressing....
Consider this: Xbox360 version in USA=60$
Xbox360 version in Europe = 97$
Missing content, lousy implementation. How do they justify this? Is this a way to combat piracy? Yes, but in the opposite way...
yeah I guess we're in the same boat, paying 70 euros for this game I just feel ripped off...
Which is not EA or Biowares fault but the EU's and VAT. If you want to **** and whine about something AT LEAST point them in the right direction.
#100
Posté 06 novembre 2009 - 02:16





Retour en haut






