disc0nnect7 wrote...
Ya know, I've never seen people campaign so hard for a non villainous characters' death. It's baffling. As much as they say Thane was "always meant to die" it'll never help me understand why they feel so strongly about it. It wouldn't affect their game at all if we at least had a CHOICE. Isn't that what Mass Effect used to stand for-player choice?
If I may *takes a puff from pipe* I have one theory.
I believe this has something to do with insecurity for LIKING that Thane died the way he did. Let me explain. Thane’s death (as it stands) is a no choice situation and therefore has become
canon to the eyes of many So people learnt to wax poetic about it despite the obvious inconsistencies and mistakes. It happens no matter what so might as well just accept it and love it right? “It’s amazing! It’s emotional! Blah blah blah”.
So when a poster comes along and says “That’s great and all guys but can we
also have a choice to keep him alive?” Suddenly there is a realization that if they HAD the choice in the beginning they probably wouldn’t have such a hard on for that death after all.
The general rule is that most people will try to save as many people as they can in the mass effect games and if Thane was given a choice from the get go MOST would have saved him and it would have been a non issue. Isn’t it interesting that people have actually said that a choice to keep him alive would invalidate
their choice? That’s odd considering how some have kept Mordin alive in their playthroughs but no one screams about how those people invalidate them

. Something else is going on here.
With Mordin his optional death was different. You loved the guy but most would rather save the entire krogan race, than keep him alive. Again, creating the most amount of happiness out of a bad situation. So liking that Mordin died for the whole krogan race is different to
just liking the death Thane got. Mordin’s could be prevented for one, it was built up well and like I said before his death resulted in a big pay off.
What was the payoff to Thane’s death? By comparison it seems very worthless and pointless. So the IDEA of a choice being added makes some shift uncomfortably because they don’t want the choice to exist full stop. Such a hypothetical choice would put a big ol spotlight on the “perfect death” they love so much . They would feel even more insecure about it when people start to choose his survival rather than watch him die pointlessly every single playthrough.
One of the complaints I’ve seen regarding the players who want a better ending is that such a choice existing would mean “EVERYONE would pick that!”. So hold on. So you don’t want them to get the ending they want because...you don’t want other players to prefer it? Making your choice less popular? I think this can be compared to Thane’s situation. Some like the crap they were spoon-fed and resent anyone who doesn’t like or accept what they were given. Most of all they don’t want it to be obvious that what they were given was indeed crap after all and worse...THAT THEY LIKED IT.
Of course I could be wrong and this pipe just makes bubbles so
Modifié par Hyrule_Gal, 25 janvier 2013 - 06:03 .