73 réponses à ce sujet

[USS SULACO]

I am dis-appointed with ME2. No inventory system. My character walks like a lame, and runs everywhere. etc..... They should have left everything like ME1 with a new story & levels. It would have been better than it is now.  whats your honest opinion with the game? good or bad. details. 

[Twitchmonkey]

Yep, changing things is bad, I liked FFVI, every RPG since then should've just been an FFVI expansion. Sprites FTW.

[xSHAD0WENx]

well after playing DAO, i was thinking ME2 was going to be like that.



this is the darker of the chapters in ME after all. so i was thinking there was going to be sex, blood, gore, a big good story, and alot of replay to it. i was sad when that didn't happen.



still a good game. but it's hardly a rpg any more and more of a FPS now. not even a TPS

[Dethateer]

My opinion is that if I had to go through ME1's gameplay again (uber-power 1/4th through the game, metric f***tons of useless gear, maxed money and omnigel, exasperating inventory) I'd kill someone irl.
[e]I'm sorry, I forgot about the 40 mins it takes you to kill everything on the map and find every resource node while trying not to slide back down the mountain you barely climbed.

Modifié par Dethateer, 03 février 2010 - 07:12 .

[Twitchmonkey]

xSHAD0WENx wrote...

well after playing DAO, i was thinking ME2 was going to be like that.

this is the darker of the chapters in ME after all. so i was thinking there was going to be sex, blood, gore, a big good story, and alot of replay to it. i was sad when that didn't happen.

still a good game. but it's hardly a rpg any more and more of a FPS now. not even a TPS

Right, the game is now first-person. Yep, that's true.

[xSHAD0WENx]

"more of a" got to read the fine print. other wise we'll be a slave on illium.

[oakenspirit]

xSHAD0WENx wrote...

this is the darker of the chapters in ME after all. so i was thinking there was going to be sex, blood, gore, a big good story, and alot of replay to it. i was sad when that didn't happen.

I am certain that is ALL THERE in abundance...

[Twitchmonkey]

xSHAD0WENx wrote...

"more of a" got to read the fine print. other wise we'll be a slave on illium.

Yes, the game's first-person portions are more numerous than it's third-person portions, because first-person portions actually exist in ME2. We don't have any evidence of them, but that shouldn't be a hindrance to making statements like this.

[AngryTigerP]

xSHAD0WENx wrote...

"more of a" got to read the fine print. other wise we'll be a slave on illium.

How is it at all a First Person Shooter? That is, how is it MORE of a FPS than a THIRD PERSON Shooter?

[spock06]

mass effect has the most dialogue of any shooter ive ever played

[spock06]

. but it's hardly a rpg any more and more of a FPS now. not even a TPS

i dont even know what to say to this

[Shlevai]

Any qualms I have are small and not nearly game breaking. I've got a lvl 21 infiltrator, got my team fleshed out and loyal except for one; and it's been an awesome ride so far.



Sure; there could have been more weapons/armor ingame at launch, but with the Cerberus network we're supposed to be getting a nice string of DLC(Such as the Hammerhead hovertank, and missions for it, along with armor pieces and weapons).



What I really want, are more side-missions. I LOVE exploring or running across side-missions. But maybe thats just because I love the combat with my infiltrator. Since killing doesn't give experience gains, only completing missions do; I'd like there to be random 'hot-zones' in the world that are more or less "Drop in, kill the mercs/terrorists/whatever, keep any money/resources you find as payment".



If there's one thing that will kill this game, it's a lack of combat. Granted I'll play through it again, but sometimes I just want to drop everything and go kill stuff; and having money and resources coming in would kinda help me flesh out stuff for my team.(I've concentrated on weapon and tech upgrades for MY character, not my squad because dropping 75k cred on something that I don't use for a single upgrade isn't easy to do).



Could even have the hotspots listed as Light, Medium, Heavy-etc for the kind of resistance estimated. Light would just be lightly armed, medium would toss in afew tougher guys, and Heavy could be vehicles, heavy mechs, etc.



I don't however agree that everything should have been kept like ME. There were afew things it did'nt do well, just like there are some things ME2 doesn't do well. But they changed, added and fixed enough things that the things they kinda 'messed up' on are understandable.

[Twitchmonkey]

spock06 wrote...

mass effect has the most dialogue of any shooter ive ever played

I don't know. In Rainbow Six you can shout commands at the wall for as long as you please. I guess that's more of a monologue though.

[USS SULACO]

i don't know man. I'm just let down. Mass Effect is the only RPG that I play and I've been waiting awhile for ME2. I might get over it, but I just don't know why devs don't just leave a good thing the way it is. Maybe make improvements, but don't re-do the whole game. Sometimes i feel like I'm playing Gears of War, when All I want too do is explore planets, go on side missions, and finally win the game. But they took half that stuff out.

[AngryTigerP]

Shlevai wrote...

What I really want, are more side-missions. I LOVE exploring or running across side-missions. But maybe thats just because I love the combat with my infiltrator. Since killing doesn't give experience gains, only completing missions do; I'd like there to be random 'hot-zones' in the world that are more or less "Drop in, kill the mercs/terrorists/whatever, keep any money/resources you find as payment".

If there's one thing that will kill this game, it's a lack of combat. Granted I'll play through it again, but sometimes I just want to drop everything and go kill stuff; and having money and resources coming in would kinda help me flesh out stuff for my team.(I've concentrated on weapon and tech upgrades for MY character, not my squad because dropping 75k cred on something that I don't use for a single upgrade isn't easy to do).

Oh, dear me, yes.

As flawed as it might have been for ME1, something like Pinnacle Station (except free, given the Cerberus Network system <__<) would be absolutely wonderful; it's actually FUN to fight in this game.

Even if we got some sort of VR trainer or something, I would love to see some sort of fast-action options to practice my strategies, find good squad builds, etc.

[Colinissile]

I think it's amazing how so many of us are totally (or in my case, slightly) disappointed by Mass Effect 2 after playing Mass Effect 1, but the critics seem to think the opposite...this is the highest rated game since Bioshock.

[Twitchmonkey]

Colinissile wrote...

I think it's amazing how so many of us are totally (or in my case, slightly) disappointed by Mass Effect 2 after playing Mass Effect 1, but the critics seem to think the opposite...this is the highest rated game since Bioshock.

Where do you think that every person that is disappointed in ME2 comes? That's right, right here. So there should really be no surprise that these boards do not reflect the reality of the outside world. It happens with any game really, well, unless the developers decide to make a sequel and change nothing at all, which does happen occasionally.

[xSHAD0WENx]

so was halo 2. best saling game(of it's time) but once you beat the game. your left saying ......that's it.

Modifié par xSHAD0WENx, 03 février 2010 - 07:28 .

[USS SULACO]

Colinissile wrote...

I think it's amazing how so many of us are totally (or in my case, slightly) disappointed by Mass Effect 2 after playing Mass Effect 1, but the critics seem to think the opposite...this is the highest rated game since Bioshock.

Critics are paid by big game companies to give good reviews. MW2 got good reviews, but it sucked. I never listen to reviews.

[Twitchmonkey]

xSHAD0WENx wrote...

so was halo 2. best saling game(of it's time) but once you beat the game. your left saying ......that's it.

You maybe. I would agree, but there are a great many people that love to replay the campaign as well as go online and fight other people.

Critics are paid by big game companies to give good reviews. MW2 got good reviews, but it sucked. I never listen to reviews.

That would explain why Catwoman for the Xbox (also published by EA) got a 45 on Metacritic. God, it's amazing how easy the arguments posted on these forums are to knock down.

Modifié par Twitchmonkey, 03 février 2010 - 07:32 .

[xSHAD0WENx]

they could have added to the terrain and put in....well terrain. but they opted into making small encounters. the least they could have done was to add multi landing zone on a planet, not just one and that's it.

[USS SULACO]

Crawling_Chaos wrote...

USS SULACO wrote...

i don't know man. I'm just let down. Mass Effect is the only RPG that I play and I've been waiting awhile for ME2. I might get over it, but I just don't know why devs don't just leave a good thing the way it is. Maybe make improvements, but don't re-do the whole game. Sometimes i feel like I'm playing Gears of War, when All I want too do is explore planets, go on side missions, and finally win the game. But they took half that stuff out.

I loved travelling for hours through empty generic terrain, and going through the same bunkers and warehouses.

They could have added better terrain, more diverse terrain, and maybe rouge bandits or creatures to fight on the planets, along with planets without enemies that were just beautiful and awsome to explore. The could have also created more diverse buildings on the planets. Instead, they just deleted all that WTF. When I saw the two disc I felt like this game is gona be a rpg shooter adventure. Now I'm playing it and well, they fooled me. At least they got what they wanted. My money. Thats what it's all about anyway...................It's like AVATAR....Big advertizing and average movie.

[Twitchmonkey]

ME2's characters and story were 10 times better than anything you got in Avatar, but getting to your point about exploring terrain, you do understand that ME2 had a budget and a projected development time? Instead of giving us a bunch of copied and pasted buildings with a few different enemy types and an different completion text box, we got a handful of unique side missions that were interesting to play and learn about.



Could they have added both? Sure, assuming infinite time and resources, but taking into consideration their limitations, I'm much happier that we got what we got than what ME1 gave us.