Aller au contenu

Photo

Into the Bad Girl: Jack Fans


20813 réponses à ce sujet

#4601
royceclemens

royceclemens
  • Members
  • 968 messages

yorkj86 wrote...

Samara is sent in because the people she is directed to kill have killed or corrupted everyone else who has been sent before her.  Notice, she is good at killing, and incorruptible.  A Justicar is a brute-force, last resort for a problem that has resisted solution.  Assigning a Justicar to a problem is a recognition that all else has failed, but something still needs to be done.

The Code is imperfect.  Samara is imperfect.  Justice is imperfect.  The Law is imperfect. 

Samara is just as much the Law as Judge Dredd is the Law, and both operate similarly.  In fact, Judges and Justicars are pretty much the same thing.  Well, almost.


I'd liken her more to Inspector Javert, who devoted his life to re-imprisoning an escaped convict who did nothing more than steal a loaf of bread.  When finding out that this criminal was a good man, Javert committed suicide, as his worldview was destroyed.  But even Javert made room in his mind, even if at only at the very end, that he may have been wrong, Samara won't even give that little bit.  Javert was unaware that there was complexity and shades of gray.  Samara is aware of this, but proceeds anyway.

But one thing, I'm curious about your reply.  You say she's been sent, but I thought it was established that Justicars are lone operatives that had no governing body.  Doesn't that mean Samara would actually go looking for injustice?  And doesn't that bespeak more of personal bloodlust than an overweening thirst for justice?

#4602
Guest_yorkj86_*

Guest_yorkj86_*
  • Guests

Mondo47 wrote...

yorkj86 wrote...

Samara is sent in because the people she is directed to kill have killed or corrupted everyone else who has been sent before her.  Notice, she is good at killing, and incorruptible.  A Justicar is a brute-force, last resort for a problem that has resisted solution.  Assigning a Justicar to a problem is a recognition that all else has failed, but something still needs to be done.

The Code is imperfect.  Samara is imperfect.  Justice is imperfect.  The Law is imperfect. 

Samara is just as much the Law as Judge Dredd is the Law, and both operate similarly.  In fact, Judges and Justicars are pretty much the same thing.


Joe Dredd though was always a bastard... total, complete, dyed-in-the-wool bastard. Judge Death was just Dredd with flashier powers. I don't think either was ever supposed to elicit warm sympathetic feelings from us. Samara is though. We're supposed to feel her conflict at slaying her own child, but... I don't know, I just feel like all we get is a sigh and "Well, it had to be done." It doesn't breed any kind of empathy in me for her horrible job - just like I read 2000AD just to see what Dredd was filling with lead this week, not be shocked that he feels a little bad about smacking the **** out of an old lady because her walking stick is tapping too loudly in a low-noise zone.

I prefered Ace Trucking Co. anyways :D


Dredd is supposed to be impartial.  The Law is supposed to be impartial.  Samara is supposed to be impartial.  The Code is supposed to be impartial.

Dredd feels bad about things, but he doesn't let them effect him because he represents the Law, and the Law is supposed to be impartial.  The exact same thing is true of Samara, and the Code.

Do you not feel the same way about a cop, a judge, and the guy who throws the switch on the electric chair, simply because they're all different people, with different jobs?  Dredd and Samara are all of those guys, in one person.

#4603
Heart Collector

Heart Collector
  • Members
  • 197 messages

MHRazer wrote...
Could Jack actually beat Samara though? I don't know. I think yes, especially if you take Jack's Purgatory cutscene into account. (That's the kind of survival-mode-biotic-bulldozer-no-hesitation I'm talking about.)


I think Jack would win if she caught Samara by surprise, or if Samara underestimated her... Her brute biotic force could be too much even for a biotic powerhouse like Samara to handle... Otherwise Samara's experience, efficiency and cold calculation in conjunction with her own raw power would help her prevail.

#4604
royceclemens

royceclemens
  • Members
  • 968 messages
Quoth yorkj86: "Elaborate upon what you mean by "the code ain't hers." She makes it her own, as does every Justicar. She discards her previous life adopts the life of the Justicar."



The Code is 5000 sutras on any possible situation. I don't think Samara wrote those sutras. Someone else did. Which leads me to believe that she read the code and liked what she saw.

#4605
Guest_yorkj86_*

Guest_yorkj86_*
  • Guests

royceclemens wrote...

yorkj86 wrote...

Samara is sent in because the people she is directed to kill have killed or corrupted everyone else who has been sent before her.  Notice, she is good at killing, and incorruptible.  A Justicar is a brute-force, last resort for a problem that has resisted solution.  Assigning a Justicar to a problem is a recognition that all else has failed, but something still needs to be done.

The Code is imperfect.  Samara is imperfect.  Justice is imperfect.  The Law is imperfect. 

Samara is just as much the Law as Judge Dredd is the Law, and both operate similarly.  In fact, Judges and Justicars are pretty much the same thing.  Well, almost.


I'd liken her more to Inspector Javert, who devoted his life to re-imprisoning an escaped convict who did nothing more than steal a loaf of bread.  When finding out that this criminal was a good man, Javert committed suicide, as his worldview was destroyed.  But even Javert made room in his mind, even if at only at the very end, that he may have been wrong, Samara won't even give that little bit.  Javert was unaware that there was complexity and shades of gray.  Samara is aware of this, but proceeds anyway.

But one thing, I'm curious about your reply.  You say she's been sent, but I thought it was established that Justicars are lone operatives that had no governing body.  Doesn't that mean Samara would actually go looking for injustice?  And doesn't that bespeak more of personal bloodlust than an overweening thirst for justice?


If Samara won't admit that she's wrong, and/or that the Code is wrong, it's because she believes in Justice as a meta-principle.  Justice is supposed to be impartial.  If the Justice System fails us, we amend it, as was done with the Oaths of Subsumation, but to throw it out altogether is just asking for it.

#4606
Guest_yorkj86_*

Guest_yorkj86_*
  • Guests

royceclemens wrote...

Quoth yorkj86: "Elaborate upon what you mean by "the code ain't hers." She makes it her own, as does every Justicar. She discards her previous life adopts the life of the Justicar."

The Code is 5000 sutras on any possible situation. I don't think Samara wrote those sutras. Someone else did. Which leads me to believe that she read the code and liked what she saw.


We don't know her exact motivations.  We can speculate endlessly, though. 

She became a Justicar around the time she found out her daughters were all Ardat-Yakshi.  I suspect that it has something to do with the fact that she felt as if she had been done some injustice by fate, but that she had a strong enough sense of responsibility to know that we are obligated to clean up the "messes" we create.  Becoming a Justicar was the only legal means of dealing with her daughters.

EDIT: In addtion, she likely desired to have order in her life, and perhaps for a way to be distant from her emotions, as she had suffered a grievous loss.  The Code provides both.

Modifié par yorkj86, 16 avril 2010 - 03:12 .


#4607
royceclemens

royceclemens
  • Members
  • 968 messages

yorkj86 wrote...

royceclemens wrote...

yorkj86 wrote...

Samara is sent in because the people she is directed to kill have killed or corrupted everyone else who has been sent before her.  Notice, she is good at killing, and incorruptible.  A Justicar is a brute-force, last resort for a problem that has resisted solution.  Assigning a Justicar to a problem is a recognition that all else has failed, but something still needs to be done.

The Code is imperfect.  Samara is imperfect.  Justice is imperfect.  The Law is imperfect. 

Samara is just as much the Law as Judge Dredd is the Law, and both operate similarly.  In fact, Judges and Justicars are pretty much the same thing.  Well, almost.


I'd liken her more to Inspector Javert, who devoted his life to re-imprisoning an escaped convict who did nothing more than steal a loaf of bread.  When finding out that this criminal was a good man, Javert committed suicide, as his worldview was destroyed.  But even Javert made room in his mind, even if at only at the very end, that he may have been wrong, Samara won't even give that little bit.  Javert was unaware that there was complexity and shades of gray.  Samara is aware of this, but proceeds anyway.

But one thing, I'm curious about your reply.  You say she's been sent, but I thought it was established that Justicars are lone operatives that had no governing body.  Doesn't that mean Samara would actually go looking for injustice?  And doesn't that bespeak more of personal bloodlust than an overweening thirst for justice?


If Samara won't admit that she's wrong, and/or that the Code is wrong, it's because she believes in Justice as a meta-principle.  Justice is supposed to be impartial.  If the Justice System fails us, we amend it, as was done with the Oaths of Subsumation, but to throw it out altogether is just asking for it.


Ah, but we're comparing apples and oranges.  The justice system is an element of government that is accountable not only to the citizenry, but to other branches of governance.  Justicars are a monastic order accountable only to themselves.  The justice system is less personal that what the Justicars apparently do.  Government work is governrment work while being a Justicar, to hear Samara tell it, is more of a personal calling.  Don't you think that it's at least a little bit possible that Samara heeded this personal call because the thought of killing people appealed to her?

And where did you get that the Oaths could be amended?  Was that in the codex and I just missed it?

Y'know, I like these compare and contrast things we do with Jack.  Which one should we do next?

#4608
Guest_yorkj86_*

Guest_yorkj86_*
  • Guests

royceclemens wrote...

Ah, but we're comparing apples and oranges.  The justice system is an element of government that is accountable not only to the citizenry, but to other branches of governance.  Justicars are a monastic order accountable only to themselves.  The justice system is less personal that what the Justicars apparently do.  Government work is governrment work while being a Justicar, to hear Samara tell it, is more of a personal calling.  Don't you think that it's at least a little bit possible that Samara heeded this personal call because the thought of killing people appealed to her?

And where did you get that the Oaths could be amended?  Was that in the codex and I just missed it?

Y'know, I like these compare and contrast things we do with Jack.  Which one should we do next?


Not quite apples and oranges.  Or maybe it is, but not in the way you think.  Humans don't have an extension of the justice system like the Asari do.

From the Codex:
"The asari solution to the most vicious and destructive criminal element is the Justicar Order." 
"The Oaths pledge protection of the innocent, the punishment of the guilty, and defense of common law and norms of asari society."

Regarding Oaths being amended - The Oaths were created because of a general concern among the Asari populace that the Justicars would rearrange the order of things to benefit themselves, or stage a coup if the state of things were not to their liking/not up to the standards of the Code.  The Code, thus, is subserviant to the rest of Asari society.

#4609
Mondo47

Mondo47
  • Members
  • 3 485 messages

royceclemens wrote...

Y'know, I like these compare and contrast things we do with Jack.  Which one should we do next?


Let's not do Jack and Miranda, ok? Thanks to Bobby and a pack of perverted ladies (ahem) that one's been buried well and truly... it degenerated into a Top/Bottom debate that took in far too much BDSM subculture ;)

Only with more biotics.

#4610
Guest_yfhfrg_*

Guest_yfhfrg_*
  • Guests

Mondo47 wrote...

Let's not do Jack and Miranda, ok? Thanks to Bobby and a pack of perverted ladies (ahem) that one's been buried well and truly... it degenerated into a Top/Bottom debate that took in far too much BDSM subculture ;)

Only with more biotics.


In this bed, Miranda follows orders. That's how I'd see it anyway. Sorry, couldn't help myself. :whistle:

#4611
Jackal904

Jackal904
  • Members
  • 2 244 messages

MHRazer wrote...

Now maybe if she got Samara to a point where she had beaten her, Samara was defenseless, and all that was left was to deal the final blow - then Jack might hesitate. But I imagine that would only be if Shepard had changed her a bit through the Paragon romance, because if not Jack says she always does "the smart thing," and letting Samara live to try and kill you again another day would definitely not be the smart thing. 


That's what I'm refering too. Once the fight gets going I don't think Jack will suddenly stop right in the middle of the fight. But if Jack were to get Samara in a position where Samara is down for the count, and all Jack would need to do is deal the killing blow, then I think Jack would hesitate, and then Samara would probably take that opportunity to knock Jack in a position where she can deal the final blow.

It's like in the fight between Samara and Morinth where Samara knocks Morinth to the ground and walks over her and deals that final, killing blow.

Of course Jack could kill Samara outright before a scenario like that even pops up. Image IPB

#4612
royceclemens

royceclemens
  • Members
  • 968 messages

yorkj86 wrote...

Regarding Oaths being amended - The Oaths were created because of a general concern among the Asari populace that the Justicars would rearrange the order of things to benefit themselves, or stage a coup if the state of things were not to their liking/not up to the standards of the Code.  The Code, thus, is subserviant to the rest of Asari society.


So if The Oaths are structured to fit Asari societal mores, what if said mores become corrupt?  If Justicars protect an ideal, and the ideal falls, then what is the use of The Code?  They fight for justice until the definition of justice changes?

And actually, Mondo, I was thinking more of the "who-would-win-in-a-fight?" variety, and between Jack and that insecure, no-business-having, rat-soup-eating, no-barrier-maintaining wench, it ain't even a contest. 

#4613
Mondo47

Mondo47
  • Members
  • 3 485 messages

royceclemens wrote...

And actually, Mondo, I was thinking more of the "who-would-win-in-a-fight?" variety, and between Jack and that insecure, no-business-having, rat-soup-eating, no-barrier-maintaining wench, it ain't even a contest. 


I know - I just have this Nostradamus-like sense of knowing it would degenerate into a perv's paradise ;)

And hats off for the Dolomite reference!

Modifié par Mondo47, 16 avril 2010 - 03:43 .


#4614
Guest_yorkj86_*

Guest_yorkj86_*
  • Guests

royceclemens wrote...

yorkj86 wrote...

Regarding Oaths being amended - The Oaths were created because of a general concern among the Asari populace that the Justicars would rearrange the order of things to benefit themselves, or stage a coup if the state of things were not to their liking/not up to the standards of the Code.  The Code, thus, is subserviant to the rest of Asari society.


So if The Oaths are structured to fit Asari societal mores, what if said mores become corrupt?  If Justicars protect an ideal, and the ideal falls, then what is the use of The Code?  They fight for justice until the definition of justice changes?


If such a drastic change in mores were to change, the Code would have to follow suit, but I think you're bringing up an unfair and extreme example.  If rape, theft and murder were to become acceptable, than the Code itself has failed in its very purpose, as would be the case with the Justice system humans use.

#4615
Jackal904

Jackal904
  • Members
  • 2 244 messages

royceclemens wrote...

And actually, Mondo, I was thinking more of the "who-would-win-in-a-fight?" variety, and between Jack and that insecure, no-business-having, rat-soup-eating, no-barrier-maintaining wench, it ain't even a contest. 


I can't really think of a squadmate besides Samara who could put up a decent fight with Jack. I picture Mordin being able to do some sneaky, almost cheap-like tactic that would allow him to win. I don't know why. Like Mordin will be getting his ass kicked and then Jack gets close to him and he does the vulcan nerve pinch or something and renders her unconcious. Image IPB

Modifié par Jackal904, 16 avril 2010 - 03:55 .


#4616
Pacifien

Pacifien
  • Members
  • 11 527 messages
So.... what kind of sports do you think Jack would like?

#4617
royceclemens

royceclemens
  • Members
  • 968 messages

yorkj86 wrote...
If such a drastic change in mores were to change, the Code would have to follow suit, but I think you're bringing up an unfair and extreme example.  If rape, theft and murder were to become acceptable, than the Code itself has failed in its very purpose, as would be the case with the Justice system humans use.


It doesn't have to be drastic.  What if, for example, the Asari decided, that, for matters of convenience, there was no room for Justicars anymore?  That they presented a diplomatic threat to galactic expansion.  Would you think The Code would make room for potential obsolescence?  Would they just fade away?  That didn't work too well for the Grey Wardens.

Mondo47 wrote...
And hats off for the Dolomite reference!


Break out some Victor Hugo, and no one says anything.  Break out some DOLOMITE and then I get the hats off.  But thank you, Mondo, my partner in obscure pop culture.

Jackal904 wrote...
I can't really think of a squadmate besides Samara who could put up a decent fight with Jack. I picture Mordin being able to do some sneaky, almost cheap-like tactic that would allow him to win. I don't know why. Like Mordin will be getting his ass kicked and then Jack gets close to him and he does the vulcan nerve pinch or something and renders her unconcious. Image IPB


To be honest?  I wouldn't count Tali out.  And yes, I'm dead serious.

Modifié par royceclemens, 16 avril 2010 - 04:01 .


#4618
MHRazer

MHRazer
  • Members
  • 325 messages

Pacifien wrote...

So.... what kind of sports do you think Jack would like?

Tetherball. Not sure why.

#4619
Pacifien

Pacifien
  • Members
  • 11 527 messages

MHRazer wrote...

Pacifien wrote...

So.... what kind of sports do you think Jack would like?

Tetherball. Not sure why.


She's probably the reason all those Tetherball poles in the recess yard were mysteriously missing the actual tetherball.

#4620
adriano_c

adriano_c
  • Members
  • 1 318 messages
Not a sport, but I could see her bowling in Omega!

#4621
Guest_yfhfrg_*

Guest_yfhfrg_*
  • Guests
I don't know. All of the squaddies have something. Thane can avoid being seen, Kasumi can literally disappear, Grunt is a damn superkrogan.

#4622
Mak999

Mak999
  • Members
  • 59 messages
Nobody noticed a scar on his neck Jack?

#4623
Guest_yorkj86_*

Guest_yorkj86_*
  • Guests

royceclemens wrote...

It doesn't have to be drastic.  What if, for example, the Asari decided, that, for matters of convenience, there was no room for Justicars anymore?  That they presented a diplomatic threat to galactic expansion.  Would you think The Code would make room for potential obsolescence?  Would they just fade away?  That didn't work too well for the Grey Wardens.


Then the Justicar Order would likely dissolve.   I'm sure there would be some Justicars who would be angry, as Justicars known to have egos about the privileges their powers allow them.  I'm also sure that the ones who leave peacefully would get a chuckle out of the decision.

#4624
Jackal904

Jackal904
  • Members
  • 2 244 messages

royceclemens wrote...

To be honest?  I wouldn't count Tali out.  And yes, I'm dead serious.


Lol really? Would you mind elaborating? Unless she creates an army of drones I don't she how she stands a fraction of a chance against Jack. In fact if all squadmates were to just have a giant free for all, I'd say Tali would be the first to go. Well, actually probably Jacob would die first, then Tali.

#4625
Guest_yorkj86_*

Guest_yorkj86_*
  • Guests

royceclemens wrote...

To be honest?  I wouldn't count Tali out.  And yes, I'm dead serious.


You mean Tali's Combat Drone, right?  That a Quarian's mechanical construct is more useful than she is is some really, really potent irony.

Modifié par yorkj86, 16 avril 2010 - 04:16 .