Nivenus wrote...
Gotta disagree. While you make some very good points you through it too much character assassination for me to overlook the weak points of your argument.
First of all, Jack is far too traumatized to be a good role model for women.
Really? I see a woman who has had some horrific things done to her, but traumatized? Talitha (From "I Remember Me" in ME1) was traumatized. Jack is not traumatized. Jack is supremely pissed off, but not traumatized. There's nothing broken in Jack - it's battered, dented and bloody, but not broken. She keeps going, and yeah, she's bitter, but she can still trust (Murtoch, anyone?) - and that alone says she's still in one piece. Jack is a superb realist - and the only pity in that is how she came to that state.
So? Why should she? I don't trust anyone without damn good reasons either. Anyone who is willing to instantly trust people are called victims - and rightly so. Not healthy? Not hardly.She may be fiercely independent and unwilling to take crap from others - and that's definitely a good thing - but it gets to a point where, unless you paragon romance her, she absolutely refuses to trust in anyone. That's not healthy.
Not in the least. She also gets a kick off of killing and is excessively violent - not as much as I expected her to be (she's definitely not a psychopath the way BioWare advertised her)
That's not her fault - she was conditioned to be that way. Conditioning can be broken.
For their own sakes. Jack is trouble and she knows it. Everyone she ever allowed herself to care about is dead. To Jack, diving into a pack of Blue Suns mercs is nothing. Love? That's risky.and has a derogatory view of others that only serves to push them away.
Hell, it's risky for everybody.
Jack's as much the model woman as Thane's the model man.
Really? Thane? He and Samara should get together. They can be sacrificingly stoic together.
Thane's sensitivity - if you care to call it that - comes from his disconnect and eiditic memory. He's sensitive the way a priest or monk is sensitive, and if you're looking for spiritual guidance (or a doubletalk excuse to kill without guilt - at least Jack has some remorse), then he's a humdinger. He's the tragic knight figure. And a needy, clingy one, at that.Which is to say, not at all once you take a look at their dark side.
You're absolutely correct. They have their strengths. But they don't have Jack's strength. Not even close.I'm not saying Jack's evil - hardly - and she amazed me with her complexity and depth. I'm just saying, I think you're being too easy on her and too hard on the others. They all have their weaknesses and flaws, alongside their strengths.
Modifié par JakeMacDon, 03 mai 2010 - 08:36 .





Retour en haut






