Dominus5412 wrote...
No, we're too busy not giving a ****.
Yeah, I didn't think so, and that was the reason.
Modifié par yorkj86, 28 juillet 2010 - 10:26 .
Guest_yorkj86_*
Dominus5412 wrote...
No, we're too busy not giving a ****.
Modifié par yorkj86, 28 juillet 2010 - 10:26 .
Thank god, I thought I was the only one to think that argument was somewhat sexist. Evidently, some think that vulnerability equals weakness.JohnnyDollar wrote...
http://social.biowar...ndex/2063268/20
This poster appears to have totally missed the Jack character, imo.
I find these comments to have a touch of misandry in them, actually.
Where does this thinking come from? Is it from a misandric or radical feminist point of view, that no women should be portrayed as vulnerable, and that any relationship that a women has with a man, cannot be affected by that relationship, and it is only superficial?
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Modifié par JohnnyDollar, 28 juillet 2010 - 10:28 .
...And the award for best response I've heard all day goes to...Dominus5412 wrote...
No, we're too busy not giving a ****.
JohnnyDollar wrote...
This poster appears to have totally missed the Jack character, imo.
I find these comments to have a touch of misandry in them, actually.
Where does this thinking come from? Is it from a misandric or radical feminist point of view, that no women should be portrayed as vulnerable, and that any relationship that a women has with a man, cannot be affected by that relationship, and it is only superficial?
Modifié par Goat_Shepard, 28 juillet 2010 - 10:33 .
Guest_yorkj86_*
JohnnyDollar wrote...
@york
I didn't ask about a defense squad to defend her character. I asked about where the thinking comes from, to draw that conclusion in that post, and provided a link to it.
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
I have got a monster migraine, and I can't get rid of that SOB.yorkj86 wrote...
JohnnyDollar wrote...
@york
I didn't ask about a defense squad to defend her character. I asked about where the thinking comes from, to draw that conclusion in that post, and provided a link to it.
I didn't say that you were asking for a defense squad, I just had a vaguely-related stray thought.
Guest_yorkj86_*
yorkj86 wrote...
Hey, wait a minute...do the Jackolytes even have a Fast-Response Character-Defense Squad?
Guest_yorkj86_*
adriano_c wrote...
yorkj86 wrote...
Hey, wait a minute...do the Jackolytes even have a Fast-Response Character-Defense Squad?
What does this even mean?
yorkj86 wrote...
adriano_c wrote...
yorkj86 wrote...
Hey, wait a minute...do the Jackolytes even have a Fast-Response Character-Defense Squad?
What does this even mean?
A group of people who are united by, and obsessed with, the defense of a character they like, on an online forum. They feel as if they have let the character down by not making sure everyone knows that their opinions are wrong, in their interpretation of a character.
Guest_yorkj86_*
Goat_Shepard wrote...
yorkj86 wrote...
adriano_c wrote...
yorkj86 wrote...
Hey, wait a minute...do the Jackolytes even have a Fast-Response Character-Defense Squad?
What does this even mean?
A group of people who are united by, and obsessed with, the defense of a character they like, on an online forum. They feel as if they have let the character down by not making sure everyone knows that their opinions are wrong, in their interpretation of a character.
And they must be first on the scene of any character bashing, but only if it's their favorite.
Jack could definitely use one, I've read stuff more awful than from any other hate group. Then again, sometimes I don't want to say anything because of how moronic it is.
Modifié par yorkj86, 28 juillet 2010 - 10:54 .
yorkj86 wrote...
A group of people who are united by, and obsessed with, the defense of a character they like, on an online forum. They feel as if they have let the character down by not making sure everyone knows that their opinions are wrong, in their interpretation of a character.
yorkj86 wrote...
Nah, we don't need one. Do you think they would be convinced, no matter how well we argue? There's a difference between being a fan of a character, and letting that character's fandom define one's self as a fan of that character.
EDIT: Jackolytes seem to understand
yorkj86 wrote...
Does anyone consistently factor roleplay in to their process of choosing squadmates?
Mondo47 wrote...
More guns and armour?
Jeez, BioWare, the guns we have do the bastard job already! Give us some more alternative costumes so we can play dressup some more!
Erm... I didn't say that, ok?
Dominus5412 wrote...
No, we're too busy not giving a ****.
Modifié par Jackal904, 28 juillet 2010 - 11:11 .
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Damn tension migrain.Goat_Shepard wrote...
Otherwise you end up like Johnny with migrains
Modifié par JohnnyDollar, 28 juillet 2010 - 11:09 .
Jackal904 wrote...
I will admit that I always bring Jack with me no matter the situation. No matter the difficulty, no matter what Shepard I'm using, no matter the mission, I always bring Jack with me. But it's not just because she's my favorite character, with active squad power usage off, she is very useful with pull. Once I went active-squad-power-usage-off I never went back. I wish I had a capture card because then I'd make a video that shows how useful she is, even on higher difficulties (of course Samara could do the same, and she has an assault rifle). Jack's usefulness in combat is severely underrated.
And for the record, Jack is no "squishier" than any other squadmate (besides Grunt of course) in combat.
It's just that when she uses the shotgun she becomes aggressive and suddenly loses all sense of self-preservation. Having her use the pistol makes her less likely to turn into Rambo. The decrease in firepower from the shotgun to the pistol isn't that big of a deal anyway. Unless a squadmate is using a sniper rifle, their weapon damage is pretty insignificant. Her ability to use pull often is all that really matters.
JohnnyDollar wrote...
Damn tension migrain.
I had an icepack on the back of my neck for an hour, and it did no good. I just took a steaming hot shower, and I'm about to put the ice back on. I'm going to get rid this SOB.[smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/wink.png[/smilie]
Modifié par Goat_Shepard, 29 juillet 2010 - 12:37 .
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
I'm slowly defeating it, it's nearly gone now. If I had muscle relaxer, it would have already disappeared a couple of hours ago, but those aren't good for your liver and kidneys to take on a regular basis. Massages can help, if they are done right. Meditative music and/or hypnotherapy type audio can help those muscles relax. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation also can help a great deal. I wish I had a TENS unit!Goat_Shepard wrote...
I honestly don't know what a migrain feels like lol pretty care free over here. I hear a good neck massage does wonders, as well as meditative music. Even got some suggestions
And in order to not help your migrain, I know I should just shut up and try the romance, but if you do Jack's romance the right way, you are pretty much the only person who was offered sex from her and refused, right? So the comment in that quote doesn't seem to make sense at a very basic level.
Modifié par JohnnyDollar, 29 juillet 2010 - 01:21 .
Mondo47 wrote...
More guns and armour?
Jeez, BioWare, the guns we have do the bastard job already! Give us some more alternative costumes so we can play dressup some more!
Erm... I didn't say that, ok?
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Modifié par JohnnyDollar, 29 juillet 2010 - 02:00 .
NICKjnp wrote...
Sorry but just like with academia's phrase: what is learned can not be unlearned..... What is posted on the Internet can not be unposted.
JohnnyDollar wrote...
http://social.biowar...ndex/2063268/20This poster appears to have totally missed the Jack character, imo.Miss Yuna of Atlanta wrote...
The worst of them all, though, is Jack. Again, I adore
her as a character, but the transition from "I'm a dangerous, angry
head-case" to "oh god, I'm so vulnerable, Shepard, hold me and protect
me with your mighty penis" is shockingly abrupt. I don't understand why
it's so slapped together. BioWare's writing staff usually excels at
pacing.
I find these comments to have a touch of misandry in them, actually.
Where does this thinking come from? Is it from a misandric or radical feminist point of view, that no women should be portrayed as vulnerable, and that any relationship that a women has with a man, cannot be affected by that relationship, and it is only superficial?