eldav wrote...
jack is the best.
It's true! :happy:
Also, hi.
Guest_yorkj86_*
eldav wrote...
jack is the best.
This idea brings forth epic-type thoughts. That would be a hilarious idea for a ficyorkj86 wrote...
The image of Jack doing her taxes is hilarious. Just sayin'.
Razorsedge820 wrote...
I wonder if Jack has to pay taxes since she is basically off the grid. Even if taxes exist in the Mass Effect universe I doubt Jack would ever pay them anyway.
I wonder how Jacks missing Identity would effect her relationship with Shepard. How does Jack get pass Bailey and that Turian scanner back on the citadel anyway?
Perhaps if Jack does register her name to become part of the galactic community for whatever reason does that mean all those crimes she did not answer to will catch up to her? Would Jack have to live a clandestine lifestyle is she is in a relationship with Shep since the spot light is aways on Shepard?
Guest_yorkj86_*
Modifié par Mondo47, 20 août 2010 - 01:33 .
Guest_yorkj86_*
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Modifié par JohnnyDollar, 20 août 2010 - 02:09 .
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Jack's a renegade. Can she care for anyone other than herself? Ever hear of Bonnie and Clyde? A renegade Shepard can be no more caring for himself, than Jack can be about herself, I would think. As far as getting in the sack goes, women like it just as much as men do, if not more so.Mondo47 wrote...
Perhaps someone with Renegade-ish elements, or with more moral flexibility (not one of my Sheps is 'pure' Paragon or Renegade), but a pretty solid Renegade Shep... can someone like that care about anyone other than themselves? That's got to be a fine line between actually caring for Jack and just using feelings to keep a solid biotic about with the benefit of getting her in the sack.
Blame them mommy-genes again, but Jack deserves better than that.
Modifié par JohnnyDollar, 20 août 2010 - 03:09 .
Guest_yorkj86_*
Modifié par yorkj86, 20 août 2010 - 02:51 .
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Modifié par JohnnyDollar, 20 août 2010 - 02:55 .
Guest_yorkj86_*
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Modifié par JohnnyDollar, 20 août 2010 - 03:06 .
Guest_yorkj86_*
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Modifié par JohnnyDollar, 20 août 2010 - 03:16 .
Guest_yorkj86_*
JohnnyDollar wrote...
8 posts up ^. Why are you evading my statements and questions?
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
I'm not that serious. Maybe being a little argumentative, which is nothing new for me.yorkj86 wrote...
I wasn't aware that I was evading your statements and questions. I wasn't aware that you were being arguing seriously, either, because I was picking up inconsistencies in your line of reasoning.JohnnyDollar wrote...
8 posts up ^. Why are you evading my statements and questions?
Modifié par JohnnyDollar, 20 août 2010 - 04:11 .
Guest_yorkj86_*
Modifié par yorkj86, 20 août 2010 - 04:22 .
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
I'm talking about a difference with Shepard and his alignment. He's a renegade, not 100% renegade, but still renegade nonetheless. I'm not talking about the player. If you believe that my reasoning is fallatious, then please elaborate.yorkj86 wrote...
It seemed to me that you were saying that Jack can get along with a Renegade Shepard, but then you went on to downplay the differences between Paragon and Renegade Shepard. If there is no difference, and the difference is instead with the player, and not the Shepard and his alignment, it made me think that you were being silly with an argument that plays on a reverse-twist of the Continuum fallacy.
Modifié par JohnnyDollar, 20 août 2010 - 04:40 .
Guest_yorkj86_*
JohnnyDollar wrote...
I'm talking about a difference with Shepard and his alignment. He's a renegade, not 100% renegade, but still renegade nonetheless. I'm not talking about the player. If you believe that my reasoning is fallatious, then please elaborate.
Does a renegade Shepard have to be untrustworthy? Is Jack trustworthy?
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Haven't given it that much thought. Either or, I suppose.yorkj86 wrote...
Am I supposed to view this from the perspective of a Shepard who is pursuing her, or a Shepard who is already in a relationship with her?
First, your example is a bit vague to me. Troops have sacrificed their lives in battle, since practically the beginning of the first confrontations between Humans on earth. I don't see how this woud necessarily mean that the Commander/leader of those troops is untrustworthy, though.If this Shepard is Renegade enough to sacrifice a teammate's life to get the job done, as Jack might do herself, in committing a crime, then it would be hypocritical of this Shepard to dismiss her for her questionable trustworthiness. This is one way things could result in a mess, between Renegade Shepard and Jack. Neither of them would think they could fully trust each other. It might be a relationship built upon the understanding of instability.
I would say that this is incorrect. Jack's trustworthiness is based on her actions, and her actions alone, not proportional to Shepard's. Shepard's trustworthiness is based on his actions, and his actions alone, not proportional to Jack's.Jack's trustworthiness is proportionate to the trustworthiness she sees in Shepard.
First of all, I would like to know how a character's trustworthiness has to be proportional to another character's trustworthiness. And what of paragon Shepard and Jack's trustworthiness?This might be where some people are coming from, in saying
that a more Paragon Shepard is more fitting for a pairing with Jack. If
she sees that he is willing to stand by his Paragon convictions, then
she has more reason to trust him.
Modifié par JohnnyDollar, 20 août 2010 - 05:39 .
Guest_yorkj86_*
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Modifié par JohnnyDollar, 20 août 2010 - 05:57 .