vhatever wrote...
rumination888 wrote...
vhatever wrote...
I agree that overall a widow is better than a viper for an infiltrator. HOWEVER, a vindicator + a viper is >>> widow, assuming you have any decent FPS skills.YEAAAAAAA- no.
Not all of us have decent FPS skills. And not all of us play in little kiddie non-insanity mode where a trained chimp could win t3h gam3 where such retarded logic tends to come from.
What are you talking about? You just asserted that a widow is better if you have good FPs skills, then you refute his statement by saying "not all people have decent FPS skills".
wat da fak?
If you mean the opposite, are you saying that he has bad FPS skills, that doesn't change the fact that a Viper is incapable of outdpsing the Viper. Period. Assuming you have the same hit rates. The only way viper is better is if you consistently MISS half your shots on widow, and just shoot randomly on the rapid fire viper getting a higher hit rate Literally, it needs to be HALF of them, otherwise the widow still wins out DPS wise. And you suck quite badly if that is true.
And even if we assume that the Dominate lasts equally on Adepts and Engineers, it is STILL better on the Adept, becauses Adepts a)lack natural CC of sheilded targets, engineers have drone, singularity only stops movement, and b)Adepts do more damage from biotics. The most compelling reason is every enemy you fight late game are collectors, which engineers suck against, they have no biotic detonate, while adepts excel. In that context, adepts do 175% more damage then an engineer can do, with basic spell spam. That means we rely on spell damage 175% MORE then engineers, so we have much more to gain with dominate, while engineers are better off with warp ammo.
Modifié par newcomplex, 17 février 2010 - 08:16 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut







