DarkwanderStorm wrote...
gneissguy2003 wrote...
Bigeyez wrote...
Since when did being mature mean "I want ****** and pootytang in my videogames"?
What would showing ****** and some wang do for the game? Does that progress
the story? Does that add anything of relevance to the characters? Does
it do anything except detract from the rest of the game, and just make
Bioware a target for nutjobs who like to go on Fox News?
No it doesn't.
Okay, this is just getting frustrating now. I don't typically like getting into discussions like this, especially on an internet forum where it all seems so pointless, but I feel compelled.
No offense, but when did the wholesale exclusion of intimacy and sexuality denote maturity either? And let's be honest here, the ONLY people talking about nudity and explicit sex are people like you who obviously don't want it at all in the game. Meanwhile, the majority of the people complaining about the romantic scenes in ME2 do NOT want to see some messed up, raunchy, hardcore sex scene! They want exactly what they got with ME1: a tasteful, well thought out, artistic, and emotionally fulfilling romantic scene between your character and the object of their affections that in no way showed anything explicit or gratuitously sexual. Why and how is that so hard to understand? Why do people think that the only options are either gentle petting or going buckwild with private parts being thrown across their screen?
I understand Mr. Woo's comment of it being Bioware's call on what is inevitably put into the game because it is their game, and I think that's fine. However, I feel somewhat incensed whenever I read some of these comments and people says things such as "why would adding sex to a game make it more mature? it seems childish and immature". I feel incensed because any honest, well-adjusted, mature adult has an understanding of sexuality and shouldn't be bothered by having to deal with it. The scenes in ME1 more or less set the bar for what they can and should strive for in their games (at least in my opinion), and anything less is Bioware not creating to their full and God-given potential. And while I have not as of yet gotten to any of the romantic scenes in ME2, if they are going to be what some people in this thread are saying they will be then I, for one, am probably going to be disappointed.
I understand that each person has their own opinion on what is or is not acceptable. However, in a game where the player is assumed to be mature enough to deal with issues such as actively choosing to have their character
interrupt a conversation by blowing a defenseless person's brains out, it seems rather ridiculous to then sit there and say that it would be immature to include anything, even a bit of bare skin, that could imply sexuality or sensualness. To be honest, in my opinion it is those people who are requesting a return to the ME1-type romance scenes that have been the most mature and reasonable people in this entire discussion, especially the OP.
Perhaps the best thing for Bioware to do, as someone suggested, is to just create an option where such things would be censored if the player didn't want to see them. In the end, though, it's their choice and we the players will have very little say in the end-product.
^agree^
A full round of applause for your eloquent elucidation

.... a big quote with a one word affirmation... now tell me how you're comment doesn't fully support what posters are saying about the mentality of the pro-boobie camp :/
Now for my DISAGREEMENT.
"They want exactly what they got with ME1: a tasteful, well thought out,
artistic, and emotionally fulfilling romantic scene between your
character and the object of their affections that in no way showed
anything explicit or gratuitously sexual."
This is a point made again and again... but it speaks of NOTHING other than personal fulfilment and vicarious gratification......sex in any form whether it is justified in terms of 'sensuality' or 'artistic merit' (lol) is wanted and requested for no other reason than PERSONAL fullfilment and gratification, the player wants it fully expressed and as an adult they feel they should have it... it adds nothing to the overall game except what the player wishes to impress upon it.
"However, I feel somewhat incensed whenever I read some of these
comments and people says things such as "why would adding sex to a game
make it more mature? it seems childish and immature". I feel incensed
because any honest, well-adjusted, mature adult has an understanding of
sexuality and shouldn't be bothered by having to deal with it."
As an adult I can firmly say that I can handle ANY situation that life throws at me, and sex is the least of a tough bunch I will and have come across.. I KNOW what sex is.. I know how to get it.. I have no need of any artificialities in that department and to have subject matter which adds nothing to the overall content of the game or the context to which it is played EXCEPT of that which is imprinted by the player's personal wishes of fullfilment... is at best pointless and at worse gratuitous.... and to make a point of demanding such 'mature' (:/) material for such immature reasons.. is in itself immature. Sex and sensualness in terms of being graphically represented is done for no other reason than visual stimulation for those that want it... no actual plot or character development is gained... in other owrds, it's all in their head, governed by their needs.
"I understand that each person has their own opinion on what is or is
not acceptable. However, in a game where the player is assumed to be
mature enough to deal with issues such as actively choosing to have
their character
interrupt a conversation by blowing a defenseless
person's brains out, it seems rather ridiculous to then sit there and
say that it would be immature to include anything, even a bit of bare
skin, that could
imply sexuality or sensualness. To be honest, in my
opinion it is those people who are requesting a return to the ME1-type
romance scenes that have been the most mature and reasonable people in
this entire discussion, especially the OP."
There's nothing wrong with implying it... that's what I am arguing for.... but the inclusion of graphically represented sex goes BEYOND inplication and flat out demonstrates it.... and THAT is unneccessary in the context of a videogame... at the fact that it IS represented makes the comments belonging to the poster of this, in THIS context, entirely invalid.. because he is arguing against a situation which doesn't exsit.. people do ot want implication, they want representation, and that has nothing to do with what he is saying.
"Perhaps the best thing for Bioware to do, as someone suggested, is to
just create an option where such things would be censored if the player
didn't want to see them. In the end, though, it's their choice and we
the players will have very little say in the end-product."
No.... then I would be expected to pay for a game in which time and resourses have been spent on portions of the game that I would not be playing.
I would only accept this if I got a discount proportionally less in comparison to what was 'censored'...
... and let me make it clear again... I have nothing against sexuality in most forms it takes within the realms of human interaction, but find it pointless and unwanted in terms of recreational gaming.. and as such I feel it should be a niche avenue for those that want it.. not forced on those who see no need for it.