Aller au contenu

Photo

Sex and Nudity


954 réponses à ce sujet

#626
Fumbleumble

Fumbleumble
  • Members
  • 105 messages

Stanley Woo wrote...

Fumbleumble, I'm reasonably certain the "agree with me or you're wrong" stance also isn't productive.


Then show me how I'm wrong... give me justification that there are gains to be made in terms of 'character development' when the only addition is naked wireframes.

#627
SkullandBonesmember

SkullandBonesmember
  • Members
  • 1 009 messages
Guess what Fumbleumble? ROMANCE IS OPTIONAL.

#628
Fumbleumble

Fumbleumble
  • Members
  • 105 messages

SkullandBonesmember wrote...

Guess what Fumbleumble? ROMANCE IS OPTIONAL.


We're not talking romance here.. we are talking about the actual and unnecessary graphical representation of the act itself.

They are NOT the same.

#629
Cloaking_Thane

Cloaking_Thane
  • Members
  • 2 838 messages
It's also hypocrisy, if you're going to insult all Americans.....at least have the decency to spell right




#630
Fumbleumble

Fumbleumble
  • Members
  • 105 messages

Cloaking_Thane wrote...

It's also hypocrisy, if you're going to insult all Americans.....at least have the decency to spell right


I think you forgot your quote here.

#631
Cloaking_Thane

Cloaking_Thane
  • Members
  • 2 838 messages

Fumbleumble wrote...

Stanley Woo wrote...

Fumbleumble, I'm reasonably certain the "agree with me or you're wrong" stance also isn't productive.


Then show me how I'm wrong... give me justification that there are gains to be made in terms of 'character development' when the only addition is naked wireframes.


How about the fact you recruited, gained the loyalty, had many potential death missions w/ crew members and probably took you LI along every time.

Fighting side by side all the time, and are about to embark on a suicide mission w/ the possibility of nvever coming back.

Surely that is more deserving than a kiss/blackscreen

#632
Cloaking_Thane

Cloaking_Thane
  • Members
  • 2 838 messages

Manny NL wrote...

 I find it unbelievable that there really is a discussion about sex and nudity in game, while we (or you) apear to find it  no problem that the game is filled with violence and killing!!!! Apparently it is ok to shoot and kill, but it is wrong to love and have a good f*** (especially after killing some aliens) !!


Sorry if i am wrong, but i bet it is mostly americans who complain about sex in (violent) games, since they are known for their hypocrism. 


It's also hypocrisy, if you're going to insult all Americans.....at least have the decency to spell right

#633
Fumbleumble

Fumbleumble
  • Members
  • 105 messages

Cloaking_Thane wrote...

Fumbleumble wrote...

Stanley Woo wrote...

Fumbleumble, I'm reasonably certain the "agree with me or you're wrong" stance also isn't productive.


Then show me how I'm wrong... give me justification that there are gains to be made in terms of 'character development' when the only addition is naked wireframes.


How about the fact you recruited, gained the loyalty, had many potential death missions w/ crew members and probably took you LI along every time.

Fighting side by side all the time, and are about to embark on a suicide mission w/ the possibility of nvever coming back.

Surely that is more deserving than a kiss/blackscreen


This still isn't a justification for graphic sex... no matter how you cut it.

And btw... you've just made an arguement for how you feel entitled to full on, after all the work you went through... if that isn't vicarious gratification then I don't know what is..... you've just paraphrased the MOAR BOOBIES arguement. :/

#634
DarkwanderStorm

DarkwanderStorm
  • Members
  • 1 757 messages

gneissguy2003 wrote...

Bigeyez wrote...

Since when did being mature mean "I want ****** and pootytang in my videogames"?

What would showing ****** and some wang do for the game? Does that progress
the story? Does that add anything of relevance to the characters? Does
it do anything except detract from the rest of the game, and just make
Bioware a target for nutjobs who like to go on Fox News?

No it doesn't.


Okay, this is just getting frustrating now. I don't typically like getting into discussions like this, especially on an internet forum where it all seems so pointless, but I feel compelled.

No offense, but when did the wholesale exclusion of intimacy and sexuality denote maturity either?  And let's be honest here, the ONLY people talking about nudity and explicit sex are people like you who obviously don't want it at all in the game. Meanwhile, the majority of the people complaining about the romantic scenes in ME2 do NOT want to see some messed up, raunchy, hardcore sex scene! They want exactly what they got with ME1: a tasteful, well thought out, artistic, and emotionally fulfilling romantic scene between your character and the object of their affections that in no way showed anything explicit or gratuitously sexual. Why and how is that so hard to understand? Why do people think that the only options are either gentle petting or going buckwild with private parts being thrown across their screen?

I understand Mr. Woo's comment of it being Bioware's call on what is inevitably put into the game because it is their game, and I think that's fine.  However, I feel somewhat incensed whenever I read some of these comments and people says things such as "why would adding sex to a game make it more mature? it seems childish and immature".  I feel incensed because any honest, well-adjusted, mature adult has an understanding of sexuality and shouldn't be bothered by having to deal with it.  The scenes in ME1 more or less set the bar for what they can and should strive for in their games (at least in my opinion), and anything less is Bioware not creating to their full and God-given potential. And while I have not as of yet gotten to any of the romantic scenes in ME2, if they are going to be what some people in this thread are saying they will be then I, for one, am probably going to be disappointed.

I understand that each person has their own opinion on what is or is not acceptable. However, in a game where the player is assumed to be mature enough to deal with issues such as actively choosing to have their character
interrupt a conversation by blowing a defenseless person's brains out, it seems rather ridiculous to then sit there and say that it would be immature to include anything, even a bit of bare skin, that could imply sexuality or sensualness. To be honest, in my opinion it is those people who are requesting a return to the ME1-type romance scenes that have been the most mature and reasonable people in this entire discussion, especially the OP.

Perhaps the best thing for Bioware to do, as someone suggested, is to just create an option where such things would be censored if the player didn't want to see them. In the end, though, it's their choice and we the players will have very little say in the end-product.


^agree^

#635
Blind Lark

Blind Lark
  • Members
  • 99 messages
You can't honestly expect to justify nudity through saying you played a video game long enough that your character developed an intimate relationship with another character. And for the record, they're still having sex, you just don't have a very good vantage point.



Btw, I don't see the difference in spelling "American" other than a capital nor the hypocrisy in their statement. Not that I agree with the person you were replying to. To them I say, your CHARACTER is still having SEX but you just can't SEE it. Because that would be pr0n.

#636
SkullandBonesmember

SkullandBonesmember
  • Members
  • 1 009 messages
Oh and I did a little searching on the archived boards and here are some nicely put posts from the following thread-

http://meforums.biow...&forum=144&sp=0

SethSteiner

RPGs aren`t Shooters like Uncharted with a hero that
has his own character, you have a blank sheet of paper and your choices
determines who this guy or girl is. So you also choose if you want to
have a relationship or not, different from like Uncharted where it`s
not in your hands.

No one needs to have a relationship, it`s
absolutly free but of course you "pass" something. But you also pass
something if you overjump one part of a DVD.

I can`t see any
problem, if you want a dumb story without emotions, you have Modern
Warfare or Diablo 2 and that is no attack against them.


Seraphael

Is the RPG genre something static that will never
change? Is the "core fan base" some kind of uniform group all wanting
the same thing?

For me ME2 is all about getting rid of the nonsensical roleplaying game
implementations (like overly bloated loot systems and overly complex
character builds) and instead focusing on that which furthers roleplaying;
like realism and immersion. Romances are a powerful tool as they tap
into deeper emotions and can motivate a player on a whole new level.

If
I was simply about "killing everything that moves" I would pick a pure
shooter, not an RPG. Levelling up, and skill and attribute allocation
is character development in the narrowest possible sense and best
confined to MMORPGs who focus on this area to compensate for the lack
of story or roleplaying.
I'll pick 'real' character development, where romance could play a vital role, any day of the week.


Mr.Kusy

Sorry for me not feeling like reading 6 pages of this toppic. Let me just lay my opinion about the OP's post.

Sure,
lets just drop the whole "genre evolution" thing and go back to the
times when we were able to: go left, gor right, go back and go forth,
from time to time finding a treashure chest or an orc. If you like the
odlschool RPG dungeon crawlers, nobody stops you from playing them...
but what are you doing here in the first place? ME2 is nowhere near the
oldschool RPG formula - to start from - it's a shooter RPG.

Purpose
of romances in game is plain and simple - it's about making the player
as much connected with the character he's playing as possible. RPG
means - ROLE PLAYING GAME. It's a game where you take a role and play
it, there's no better way of making you feel comfortable with that role
than giving you choices and options that you could get in reall life -
emotional choices included.

You opinion seems irrational to me.
Romances were never forced on the player. The fact that those dialogue
options are there, doesn't mean you have to pick them. Fianl Fantasy 7
(and the previous ones) had romances in it - and that was 1997 - a year
before BioWare released it's first RPG game. And belive me - Final
Fantasy was not the pionier in the "romance" branch of RPG games.

So
I asume that by "back in the day" you mean year 1974 - when the first
D&D set was released (and I asure you - even then, some people were
smart enogh to do more than dungeon crawling in those pen & paper
adventures).


>National Cause

It's mostly
killing the forums, for me anyways. I have to wade through countless
romance threads to find anything interesting to read. I really don't
care if we romance Tali, or an Elcor, or a VI system, or whatever silly
crap the hormonal 15 year olds on this forum come up with. Please, I
beseech you, just go look at naughty websites and keep the romance
threads to an absolute minimum.
Aren't
forums places for people to talk abut what they are interested in? If a
romance thread is getting the most response, then thats exactly what
people want to discuss and they have every right to. Looking at the
forum the majority if the threads arent love threads, they are just the
most prominent ones as they are the most popular. And please don't
characterise people on these forums as hormonal 15 yo it makes you look
petty.<

Bail_Darilar

Aren't forums places for people to talk abut what they are interested
in? If a romance thread is getting the most response, then thats
exactly what people want to discuss and they have every right to.
Looking at the forum the majority if the threads arent love threads,
they are just the most prominent ones as they are the most popular. And
please don't characterise people on these forums as hormonal 15 yo it
makes you look petty.


Snake Eyes-Joe NInja

No. Take the poll of what interests people the most about DA:O, and the HUGE winner is the interactions and romance.

Bioware
games are amazing, not for their gameplay, which is always good. Not
for their visuals, which are always great. They are amazing for the
experience they create. Like no other company, I feel that Bioware can
create an experience the likes of which was FANTASY years ago.

For
many of us, gaming is an escape from our real lives, to something
better and adventurous, even if it is only for a few hours, and even if
it is only a game. This experience gives you another outlet, another
life that is completely your own; Your Shepard, saving the galaxy your
way. The love interests are part of that experience.

Many
people, myself included, wish they, for just a brief moment, could live
the life of adventure, action, humor and romanticism that heroes often
lead, having unique allies AND love interests. It is all part of the
experience.

Do I prefer ME to real life? Of course not. I know,
just like everyone else here (hopefully/probably) does, that it is JUST
A GAME. I'm a teacher, beginning his own website, with a loving family,
a roof over his head, a car, a beautiful, fun, understanding
girlfriend, great friends and a loyal and fun dog. I have a great life.
Do I still like to kick back with some beer, hang out with friends and
play a video game? Yes.

Love interests are part of the
experience we get when we play a Mass Effect game, let alone a Bioware
game. The LIs do not add animosity or conflict to the game, or even to
these forums, but the crazed fanatics, so to speak, do. However, this
in and of itself is just a demonstration of just how connected people
are to the characters, and the characters who they find themselves
attracted to on a role-playing level. This is the extension of all the
D&D games out there, with just so much more presentation, that it
is completely understandable to get worked up, but admittedly, some
people take it too far.

Is that the games fault? Is it a case of
self-sabotage on the part of the developers for creating the LIs in the
game? Of course not. As I have stated, Mass Effect is first and
foremost a ROLE PLAYING GAME, and LIs are part of that role, to help
you feel connected. Sadly, some people take that connection too far,
but it is not a case of games being ruined. If anything, it just goes
to show just how into the game people are, which can hardly be
considered a fault.


KainrycKarr

Romance taking up precious disc space?

So...you want the romance
options to be removed, which would alienate the vast majority of the
fanbase which DOES like the romance subplots?

Bioware has always had romances in its game.s If you don't like that, then this is not the game for you.

Change
what game you're playing if you don't like it, don't change THAT game
to your liking and ****** off everyone else who ALREADY likes it.


#637
SkullandBonesmember

SkullandBonesmember
  • Members
  • 1 009 messages

Fumbleumble wrote...

We're not talking romance here.. we are talking about the actual and unnecessary graphical representation of the act itself.

They are NOT the same.


In an adult game, isn't it logical they go together?

#638
Fumbleumble

Fumbleumble
  • Members
  • 105 messages

SkullandBonesmember wrote...

Fumbleumble wrote...

We're not talking romance here.. we are talking about the actual and unnecessary graphical representation of the act itself.

They are NOT the same.


In an adult game, isn't it logical they go together?


Is this yet another flimsy attempt at justification?..... first it was for the merits of character development. now it's for the justification of logic?

You're grasping at straws mate.

#639
SerSpiffy

SerSpiffy
  • Members
  • 522 messages
.... i don't know... i thought Jack's and Miranda's Love Scenes were nice...



the ONLY problem i had was Tali's and Garrus's....



I'm near the age of being an adult. and i for one. believe the game may have been "cute" with nudity.

but unnecessary. i mean the Saboteur had the "midnight show" pack that you HAD to have in order to play the game itself. it was like EA was PROMOTING sex and nudity in the games they Produce.



but i believe that Bioware might be saving it for later. or maybe never again like in ME1.

whatever happens. it's just good to see SOMETHING along the lines, rather than nothing.



kinda like a cheap blackout scene with moaning noises. *COUGHGTA:SACOUGH*

#640
SkullandBonesmember

SkullandBonesmember
  • Members
  • 1 009 messages

Fumbleumble wrote...

You're grasping at straws mate.


Of course. It can only be one or the other. Not a multitude of factors. Let me ask you this, if you had to choose how a romance scene unfolded in ME3, since things are only one or the other, would you rather have a sex scene like the one with the hooker in Fallout 3 with no buildup, no nothing, or the very well done Mass Effect 1 scenes?

Modifié par SkullandBonesmember, 17 février 2010 - 09:59 .


#641
Niorcs

Niorcs
  • Members
  • 129 messages

SkullandBonesmember wrote...

Fumbleumble wrote...

You're grasping at straws mate.


Of course. It can only be one or the other. Not a multitude of factors. Let me ask you this, if you had to choose how a romance scene unfolded in ME3, since things are only one or the other, would you rather have a sex scene like the one with the hooker in Fallout 3 with no buildup, no nothing, or the very well done Mass Effect 1 scenes?


I'd rather have neither, because a. you never had sex with the hooker, and b. the ME1 scenes were just different models in the same positions. I don't think either were great.

I mean, hell, real sex isn't even like that anyway. BioWare's not going to step into that territory, love.

Modifié par Niorcs, 17 février 2010 - 10:10 .


#642
SerSpiffy

SerSpiffy
  • Members
  • 522 messages
.... there are always mods ya know :'D



mod your character to have sex with the other.



GARRY'S MODish tool set FTW haha

#643
Cloaking_Thane

Cloaking_Thane
  • Members
  • 2 838 messages
no one is clamoring for "graphic sex" you're simply a prude

#644
JPWriting

JPWriting
  • Members
  • 17 messages
I dunno, I think the new LI's were handled fine... the focus was on the characters rather than the act.



The bigger 'What the heck?!' issue for me was the fact that this sequel almost seems to push you towards dropping your previously built relationship with a character. I can't go into detail because I don't want to spoil, but...



I suppose with the plot the way it is from the start of ME2 (working with/for a certain distasteful entity) a bit of rough water given that situation and some time passing makes sense, but the way it was handled was well below the standard I am accustomed to from the Bioware folks. It was extremely unrewarding to remaining faithful... and sometimes didn't even make any sense whatsoever. You may as well have not even played ME1 from the perspective of former relationships, which was very disappointing (but the main story was as good as ever).



Still a fantastic game, no doubt from me there, but the way the previously LI's were practically dropped in favor of new 'conquests' led to a knit brow and a frown from me.

Modifié par JPWriting, 17 février 2010 - 10:13 .


#645
Niorcs

Niorcs
  • Members
  • 129 messages

JPWriting wrote...

I dunno, I think the new LI's were handled fine... the focus was on the characters rather than the act.



The bigger 'What the heck?!' issue for me was the fact that this sequel almost seems to push you towards dropping your previously built relationship with a character. I can't go into detail because I don't want to spoil, but...



I suppose with the plot the way it is from the start of ME2 (working with/for a certain distasteful entity) a bit of rough water given that situation and some time passing makes sense, but the way it was handled was well below the standard I am accustomed to from the Bioware folks. It was extremely unrewarding to remaining faithful... and sometimes didn't even make any sense whatsoever. You may as well have not even played ME1 from the perspective of former relationships, which was very disappointing (but the main story was as good as ever).



Still a fantastic game, no doubt from me there, but the way the previously LI's were practically dropped in favor of new 'conquests' led to a knit brow and a frown from me.



Mmm, I think that was the point though- immediate gratification vs. long term gratification.  BioWare's said that GOOD WILL COME if you did stay faithful, and that would be extremely difficult to do so. It's the ability to try to be faithful even when the LI's freaking out because YOU WERE DEAD AND YOU DIDN'T TELL ME YOU CAME BACK AND NOW YOU'RE WITH THE BAD GUYS D: .

We'll have to see what happens in ME3.

#646
Impresario

Impresario
  • Members
  • 38 messages

Fumbleumble wrote...
Since when did nudity of any type add anything worthwhile to anything? (and remember were talking fiction here)

Do you consider this fact or opinion?. If opinion, it is a narrow one. You are railing against experiencing one part of  the fictional character's natural progression.  To support that statement the burden of proof is on you.
 
If people in real life relationships have sex, and people in fictional relationships have sex, then it follows that a realistic portrayal of romantic relationships includes sex.  The burden of proof is on you to explain why covering one's eyes is preferable.

Modifié par Impresario, 17 février 2010 - 10:18 .


#647
SerSpiffy

SerSpiffy
  • Members
  • 522 messages
this is gonna be pretty obvious but. i romanced Tali and by the looks of it... the sexual act was represented by Miranda and Jack in the same manner as Mass Effect 1
only difference was they were partially clothed. Ashley in ME1 showed only side boob
and in Liara showed some booty, but thats it.
ME1's love scenes were epic. this game needs no nudity where you can actually see a nipple or vagina.
on a side note: BIOOOOOWWAAAAAAAARRRREEEEE HOW COULD YOU D:
Tali and Garrus's Love Scenes were emotional. but shorter than the fan service on Jack/Jacob/Miranda's
why would you do that?!
Bioware are racist like Cerberus. D:
Bioware = Cerberus

Modifié par SerSpiffy, 17 février 2010 - 10:24 .


#648
Fumbleumble

Fumbleumble
  • Members
  • 105 messages

DarkwanderStorm wrote...

gneissguy2003 wrote...

Bigeyez wrote...

Since when did being mature mean "I want ****** and pootytang in my videogames"?

What would showing ****** and some wang do for the game? Does that progress
the story? Does that add anything of relevance to the characters? Does
it do anything except detract from the rest of the game, and just make
Bioware a target for nutjobs who like to go on Fox News?

No it doesn't.


Okay, this is just getting frustrating now. I don't typically like getting into discussions like this, especially on an internet forum where it all seems so pointless, but I feel compelled.

No offense, but when did the wholesale exclusion of intimacy and sexuality denote maturity either?  And let's be honest here, the ONLY people talking about nudity and explicit sex are people like you who obviously don't want it at all in the game. Meanwhile, the majority of the people complaining about the romantic scenes in ME2 do NOT want to see some messed up, raunchy, hardcore sex scene! They want exactly what they got with ME1: a tasteful, well thought out, artistic, and emotionally fulfilling romantic scene between your character and the object of their affections that in no way showed anything explicit or gratuitously sexual. Why and how is that so hard to understand? Why do people think that the only options are either gentle petting or going buckwild with private parts being thrown across their screen?

I understand Mr. Woo's comment of it being Bioware's call on what is inevitably put into the game because it is their game, and I think that's fine.  However, I feel somewhat incensed whenever I read some of these comments and people says things such as "why would adding sex to a game make it more mature? it seems childish and immature".  I feel incensed because any honest, well-adjusted, mature adult has an understanding of sexuality and shouldn't be bothered by having to deal with it.  The scenes in ME1 more or less set the bar for what they can and should strive for in their games (at least in my opinion), and anything less is Bioware not creating to their full and God-given potential. And while I have not as of yet gotten to any of the romantic scenes in ME2, if they are going to be what some people in this thread are saying they will be then I, for one, am probably going to be disappointed.

I understand that each person has their own opinion on what is or is not acceptable. However, in a game where the player is assumed to be mature enough to deal with issues such as actively choosing to have their character
interrupt a conversation by blowing a defenseless person's brains out, it seems rather ridiculous to then sit there and say that it would be immature to include anything, even a bit of bare skin, that could imply sexuality or sensualness. To be honest, in my opinion it is those people who are requesting a return to the ME1-type romance scenes that have been the most mature and reasonable people in this entire discussion, especially the OP.

Perhaps the best thing for Bioware to do, as someone suggested, is to just create an option where such things would be censored if the player didn't want to see them. In the end, though, it's their choice and we the players will have very little say in the end-product.


^agree^


A full round of applause for your eloquent elucidation :o.... a big quote with a one word affirmation... now tell me how you're comment doesn't fully support what posters are saying about the mentality of the pro-boobie camp :/

Now for my DISAGREEMENT.

"They want exactly what they got with ME1: a tasteful, well thought out,
artistic, and emotionally fulfilling romantic scene between your
character and the object of their affections that in no way showed
anything explicit or gratuitously sexual."

This is a point made again and again... but it speaks of NOTHING other than personal fulfilment and vicarious gratification......sex in any form whether it is justified in terms of 'sensuality' or 'artistic merit' (lol) is wanted and requested for no other reason than PERSONAL fullfilment and gratification, the player wants it fully expressed and as an adult they feel they should have it... it adds nothing to the overall game except what the player wishes to impress upon it.


"However, I feel somewhat incensed whenever I read some of these
comments and people says things such as "why would adding sex to a game
make it more mature? it seems childish and immature".  I feel incensed
because any honest, well-adjusted, mature adult has an understanding of
sexuality and shouldn't be bothered by having to deal with it."


As an adult I can firmly say that I can handle ANY situation that life throws at me, and sex is the least of a tough bunch I will and have come across.. I KNOW what sex is.. I know how to get it.. I have no need of any artificialities in that department and to have subject matter which adds nothing to the overall content of the game or the context to which it is played EXCEPT of that which is imprinted by the player's personal wishes of fullfilment... is at best pointless and at worse gratuitous.... and to make a point of demanding such 'mature' (:/) material for such immature reasons.. is in itself immature. Sex and sensualness in terms of being graphically represented is done for no other reason than visual stimulation for those that want it... no actual plot or character development is gained... in other owrds, it's all in their head, governed by their needs.


"I understand that each person has their own opinion on what is or is
not acceptable. However, in a game where the player is assumed to be
mature enough to deal with issues such as actively choosing to have
their character
interrupt a conversation by blowing a defenseless
person's brains out, it seems rather ridiculous to then sit there and
say that it would be immature to include anything, even a bit of bare
skin, that could imply sexuality or sensualness. To be honest, in my
opinion it is those people who are requesting a return to the ME1-type
romance scenes that have been the most mature and reasonable people in
this entire discussion, especially the OP."

There's nothing wrong with implying it... that's what I am arguing for.... but the inclusion of graphically represented sex goes BEYOND inplication and flat out demonstrates it.... and THAT is unneccessary in the context of a videogame... at the fact that it IS represented makes the comments belonging to the poster of this, in THIS context, entirely invalid.. because he is arguing against a situation which doesn't exsit.. people do  ot want implication, they want representation, and that has nothing to do with what he is saying.

"Perhaps the best thing for Bioware to do, as someone suggested, is to
just create an option where such things would be censored if the player
didn't want to see them. In the end, though, it's their choice and we
the players will have very little say in the end-product."

No.... then I would be expected to pay for a game in which time and resourses have been spent on portions of the game that I would not be playing.

I would only accept this if I got a discount proportionally less in comparison to what was 'censored'...

... and let me make it clear again... I have nothing against sexuality in most forms it takes within the realms of human interaction, but find it pointless and unwanted in terms of recreational gaming.. and as such I feel it should be a niche avenue for those that want it.. not forced on those who see no need for it.

#649
Jackal904

Jackal904
  • Members
  • 2 244 messages

BeLikeHan wrote...

But as you said. Thread topic...I do find it strange that so many people who are obviously united in their love of Bioware and gaming on this forum should be at eachothers' throats in this thread just because some of us would have liked something a little more fleshed out (excuse the pun) in terms of the romances in the game. As others have said, I thought the scene in ME was really well done. They managed to avoid the childish and gratuitous nudity present in something like God Of War or what have you, without just fading to black and simply implying that you may or may not have boned an alien. It was a really finely crafted scene, which comes as no surprise from the guys at Bioware. I expected something similar in ME2, and got something much tamer, and yes, it was a bit of a let down. Not because I don't know how to work the internet and I'm just DYING to see some risky polygons. But because, in a game like this where character interaction and development is a major part of what makes the game, that scene is the culmination of an immense journey. You can cry "NERD" all you want, but Mass Effect has created a universe filled with characters that I genuinely like and have become invested in (in a very healthy way I promise. No Avatar.) and the scene was just a little less than I expected. After all, if you went into a battle and after firing a few shots the screen dimmed and cut away, and the game resumed at the next scene...wouldn't you feel a little cheated? I know, the analogy is extreme. But the relationships you build with other characters is one of the major factors that puts Mass Effect, and Bioware in general, at the top of the current gaming scene. You are Shepard, you shape him (or her), and experience this epic tale alongside your companions who you build a report with over the course of the game (or two games, depending). It's just strange to spend 47 hours right there with Shepard through every brutal decision, every scare, every battle, every humorous exhange, and then be pulled out of this particular "action" as if you were a 12 year old child seeing an R-rated movie with your parents.

But I digress. Though I have my opinion, it is in no way something that I feel the need to be SUPER DUPER angry about, or start some infantile boycott or anything. ME2 is one of the finest gaming experiences I have ever had, but it's inevitable that with a game of this magnitude you will come across some things you don't necessarily see eye-to-eye with the devs on. We all have our own little list of things we might have tweaked in Mass Effect one way or the other. This is one area where I just would have liked a little more. As it is, I'll live. It's still a fantastic game. And one which I apparently like to talk about way too much...


I can't believe I read all that but I did, and I completely agree with you. Sex and nudity in Mass Effect is not a big deal to me, but I just kind of felt robbed by ME2's "sex scenes" after ME1's sex scene. It's not a game breaker at all and I wouldn't even think of bringing it up if someone asked me about the bad things with ME2. The sex scenes in ME2 just kind of clash with the rest of the experience.

#650
SerSpiffy

SerSpiffy
  • Members
  • 522 messages
okay Fumbleumble, i agree with you. but there is no need to go insulting these guys.
Stanley said to try and keep the insults in.

i personally agree with both sides of the arguement.

one side of me says "yeah totally, some nudity would be awesome!"
but the other says "but at what cost? bioware could get another Fox news smeer job on them"
i know how much they want nudity. i know how it feels to want something and not get it.

like THE ROMANCE PACK (look it up)
but in the end. they'll either get over it, or find something new to occupy their thoughts.

i think they're just upset that the game is Rated Mature and they didn't get the "Sexual Themes" they wanted as described on the game contents.

it'll pass. don't worry.

p.s i'm not being a hypocrite. that last post i SWEAR i didn't intentionally insult bioware. i don't even think i did. incase you want to call me a hypocrite.

Modifié par SerSpiffy, 17 février 2010 - 10:33 .