Fanfiction Sucks
#8826
Posté 23 février 2011 - 07:02
#8827
Posté 23 février 2011 - 07:11
#8828
Posté 23 février 2011 - 07:20
#8829
Posté 23 février 2011 - 08:46
( its enough I haven't the time to write ;P )
#8830
Posté 23 février 2011 - 09:05
Gilgamesh1138 wrote...
Well then AU it is! ROFL. Though lately I have been having a crisis of self doubt and have thought of just quitting writing. Thought leaving Soulmates dangling isn't appealing.
Aww I know you have a busy life, but don't give up on finishing Soulmates. I know how you feel though about quitting but I just take a little time off and then get right back to it.
#8831
Posté 23 février 2011 - 10:13
PS One of my old regulars just got back to me to say that she likes where the story is currently heading, qed?
Modifié par Maria13, 23 février 2011 - 01:18 .
#8832
Posté 23 février 2011 - 02:17
(read just the first letters of each word)What? You now need everything stated so obviously? No.
So if you're not entirely pleased about AU that may be something to keep in mind.
#8833
Posté 23 février 2011 - 02:32
LupusYondergirl wrote...
I think Gaider's next book is about Wynne's son, actually. When asked what it would be about he said(read just the first letters of each word)What? You now need everything stated so obviously? No.
So if you're not entirely pleased about AU that may be something to keep in mind.
LOL. Who made this observation anyway?
#8834
Posté 23 février 2011 - 02:33
Gilgamesh1138 wrote...
Same for me Sia...I love your works though! I need to read your Garrus/Shep I love that pairing. need to give you a shout out again in Soulmates.
Thank you, Gil!
Wait... again? I can't believe I missed it the first time.
And don't you dare give up.
Modifié par Sialater, 23 février 2011 - 02:35 .
#8835
Posté 23 février 2011 - 02:35
LupusYondergirl wrote...
I think Gaider's next book is about Wynne's son, actually. When asked what it would be about he said(read just the first letters of each word)What? You now need everything stated so obviously? No.
So if you're not entirely pleased about AU that may be something to keep in mind.
Speaking of FIrst letters, this reminds me of somethin I used in my FF.
Operation BROTHERHOOD Raised to Minus One. BROTHERHOOD stands for Bootless Roaming Of The Exquisitely Rustic Homeland Of Oversized Dogs, the implication of raising it to minus one (which is the same as inverting the meaning altogether) being that this is not such a hopeless (bootless) endeavor at all.
How's THAT for mind screw?
Modifié par Raonar, 23 février 2011 - 02:36 .
#8836
Posté 23 février 2011 - 02:54
LupusYondergirl wrote...
I think Gaider's next book is about Wynne's son, actually. When asked what it would be about he said(read just the first letters of each word)What? You now need everything stated so obviously? No.
So if you're not entirely pleased about AU that may be something to keep in mind.
Wow! Gaider, obscure or what?
#8837
Posté 23 février 2011 - 06:35
Raonar wrote...
Speaking of FIrst letters, this reminds me of somethin I used in my FF.
Operation BROTHERHOOD Raised to Minus One. BROTHERHOOD stands for Bootless Roaming Of The Exquisitely Rustic Homeland Of Oversized Dogs, the implication of raising it to minus one (which is the same as inverting the meaning altogether) being that this is not such a hopeless (bootless) endeavor at all.
How's THAT for mind screw?
Ah, but you have to remember to Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally; exponents before multiplication, so raise ALL the terms to the -1, making it the Hopeful Standing-Still of the Awfully Sophisticated Foreign-place of Undersized Invert-dogs.
#8838
Posté 23 février 2011 - 07:00
Corker wrote...
Raonar wrote...
Speaking of FIrst letters, this reminds me of somethin I used in my FF.
Operation BROTHERHOOD Raised to Minus One. BROTHERHOOD stands for Bootless Roaming Of The Exquisitely Rustic Homeland Of Oversized Dogs, the implication of raising it to minus one (which is the same as inverting the meaning altogether) being that this is not such a hopeless (bootless) endeavor at all.
How's THAT for mind screw?
Ah, but you have to remember to Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally; exponents before multiplication, so raise ALL the terms to the -1, making it the Hopeful Standing-Still of the Awfully Sophisticated Foreign-place of Undersized Invert-dogs.
Hmm, and yet, when an operation inside a paranthesis is raised to any power, one needs to get the result FIRST, no? Unless it's an equation with as yet unknown variables that requires weird algebra. So, the result being bootless roaming of whatever, has its sense inverted.
Or whatever
#8839
Posté 23 février 2011 - 07:13
Not math... anything but math...
#8840
Posté 23 février 2011 - 07:13
Sialater wrote...
*head explodes*
Not math... anything but math...
I hear you there.
#8841
Posté 23 février 2011 - 07:51
And thanks all for the support, I was just having a moment of self doubt. But really I am so addicted to writing, I don't think I could stop. And you all make it so worth it.
@Maria13...Yeah the stats bars are high so I usually stay optimistic about them reading. *Gil stops whining*
That is what I love about this thread...I can come here, and have sense smacked into me. Thanks guys!
Modifié par Gilgamesh1138, 23 février 2011 - 07:58 .
#8842
Posté 23 février 2011 - 07:55
Raonar wrote...
Hmm, and yet, when an operation inside a paranthesis is raised to any power, one needs to get the result FIRST, no? Unless it's an equation with as yet unknown variables that requires weird algebra. So, the result being bootless roaming of whatever, has its sense inverted.
Or whatever
Yes, exactly - *all* of the terms are inverted, when really all you want to do is invert the 'bootless' part... so the (B-to-the-minus-one)ROTHERHOOD.
Sorry... you *asked* if my mind was blown...
#8843
Posté 23 février 2011 - 07:59
#8844
Posté 23 février 2011 - 08:01
Corker wrote...
Raonar wrote...
Hmm, and yet, when an operation inside a paranthesis is raised to any power, one needs to get the result FIRST, no? Unless it's an equation with as yet unknown variables that requires weird algebra. So, the result being bootless roaming of whatever, has its sense inverted.
Or whatever
Yes, exactly - *all* of the terms are inverted, when really all you want to do is invert the 'bootless' part... so the (B-to-the-minus-one)ROTHERHOOD.
Sorry... you *asked* if my mind was blown...
I'll chalk it up to saying it's a DIFFERENT kind of raising to whatever power (like the one that came up with the term used a different sort of operation that the one commoners use, something like the path to the secrets of the universe or something).
So it's all good.
#8845
Posté 23 février 2011 - 08:21
#8846
Posté 23 février 2011 - 09:56
#8847
Posté 23 février 2011 - 09:58
Gilgamesh1138 wrote...
Okay anyone else but (silly old) me get moments of crippling self doubt where you need people to kick you in the ass? Or was my moment of stupidity yesterday just my own personal doofery?
I do it all the time.
#8848
Posté 23 février 2011 - 10:07
@gilgamesh1138 self doubt is just that, your own doubt attempting to interfer with your successful completion of a projects. Let's say you complete your project and find youself dissatisfied with the overall results. You can always modify the existing or do it differently on you next. I think you'll find that pretty much every fanfiction writer, even the most popular have their moments of doubt, but they move forward and carry on. You can do it!
Modifié par DreGregoire, 23 février 2011 - 10:10 .
#8849
Posté 23 février 2011 - 10:11
Think about it Gilga, very soon you and I will be able to say we've written a novel. How many people can say that?
#8850
Posté 23 février 2011 - 10:13





Retour en haut




