Fanfiction Sucks
#9751
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 12:39
#9752
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 12:49
ZerbanDaGreat1 wrote...
Well *bleep*. I don't know how I'd get that done, (Broken Circle's already done) and leaving Oghren out would break the Aesop I'm going for.
Maybe the ability uses a different mechanism than 'connected via Fade,' then. It seems to require continued close physical proximity, which doesn't scream "Fade" to me, anyhow. The whole thing has echoes of blood magic, to me - not the thing itself, but that idea where with Blood Control, you have two bodies operating under one will. In Blood Control, it's an oppressive imposition of will; this sounds more cooperative - two minds which are of one purpose, drawing on the combined strength of two bodies.
I would approach it from that angle - something about how, after he's spent enough time with people, Ventus will actually find his body mimicking their biorhythms, heartbeat and breathing in particular. That's the point at which the bond is strong enough to use. At a guess, I see on the horizon a climactic battle scene in which the entire party fights as one? It just takes time for him to bring them all into synch with each other, at which point he can amp them all simultaneous *and* possibly serve as some sort of command and control, "I'll form THE HEAD" centering thing that helps them all coordinate. (Ignore me if you have something else in mind...)
If you've already said it's via the Fade, that could maybe just be Ventus's best idea for what's going on so far, and he'll realize that's probably wrong when he bonds to Oghren.
Modifié par Corker, 10 mai 2011 - 12:50 .
#9753
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 12:50
Also, the Mad Hermit in the Brecillian Forest was using some sort of illusion/invisibility magic when he first 'appeared', but I think Morrigan labelled him as dangerously powerful (or something).
Modifié par Shadow of Light Dragon, 10 mai 2011 - 12:54 .
#9754
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 04:34
I'm amused.
It is a year and a half since I started this FF of mine and now I finally got my first negative review (negative as in YOU SUCK LOLOLOLOL) Anonymous of course. I even got accused of my character being a Mary Sue (sticking to the classic insults, I figure).
Oh I feel so honored. Lol.
Here the full *very helpful* feedback for your amusement. It is too good not to share it.
Excuse me I'm going to cry in my pillow now how awful I am.Wow, Lenya is such a Mary Sue. Everything seems to revolve around her and no matter how much of a **** she is people still love her. To be completely frank, this is awful. I'd rather read "Of ****sons & Nobles" or "Elysium" but I tried to read your fic from beginning to end to try something else. I really tried but no matter how many times I read it, it still is lousy. Sometimes when you write you just need to use the Mary Sue litmus test first, which obviously plenty of writers don't. Wasted potential.
#9755
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 05:24
#9756
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 05:43
I just love when someone is writing such BS that he/she doesn't have at least the balls to leave the destructive horsecrap SIGNED. So I can respond accordantly- maybe just with a "You know what? STFU and come back when you have something useful to add"...but I at least had the possibility then. Ugh.
#9757
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 05:50
As for Elysium her stuff rocks. I would be proud to be in the same league as her.
#9758
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 07:26
However with that MS- accusation my life on FF.net is now complete...a writer can't go without at least one of these anon reviews there, after all.
*is amused*
#9759
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 07:35
My story is actually, besides a means to enjoy myself and cultivate my meager writing skills, a means of conducting a social psychology experiment. After almost a year, I discovered this:
Any character who happens to be both morally upright and successful is a Mary Sue, because there is no WAY a character can be believable/relatable unless they have enough issues that, by today's laws, they would be either institutionalized or thrown in prison.
So yeah, people seem to be forgetting that heroes of epic fantasies are supposed to be figures we can look up to, not pity.
#9760
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 08:28
#9761
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 08:51
Corker wrote...
ZerbanDaGreat1 wrote...
Well *bleep*. I don't know how I'd get that done, (Broken Circle's already done) and leaving Oghren out would break the Aesop I'm going for.
Maybe the ability uses a different mechanism than 'connected via Fade,' then. It seems to require continued close physical proximity, which doesn't scream "Fade" to me, anyhow. The whole thing has echoes of blood magic, to me - not the thing itself, but that idea where with Blood Control, you have two bodies operating under one will. In Blood Control, it's an oppressive imposition of will; this sounds more cooperative - two minds which are of one purpose, drawing on the combined strength of two bodies.
I would approachit from that angle - something about how, after he's spent enough time with people, Ventus will actually find his body mimicking their biorhythms, heartbeat and breathing in particular. That's the point at which the bond is strong enough to use. At a guess, I see on the horizon a climactic battle scene in which the entire party fights as one? It just takes time for him to bring them all into synch with each other, at which point he can amp them all simultaneous *and* possibly serve as some sort of command and control, "I'll form THE HEAD" centering thing that helps them all coordinate. (Ignore me if you have something else in mind...)
If you've already said it's via the Fade, that could maybe just be Ventus's best idea for what's going on so far, and he'll realize that's probably wrong when he bonds to Oghren.
Oh. Well, it doesn't need physical contact. It's just that since Ven has no idea how it works, so he assumes that's the only way he can do it. Plus while it's only use so far is for power amping, it has more metaphysical uses later. The idea of it being a good form of blood magic is interesting, and I hay have to
Or I guess it could partly be a placebo effect. That kind of thing is more accepted with mystical stuff because it really is all in your head. Ah well, still have time to work this out.
#9762
Posté 11 mai 2011 - 02:25
GSSAGE7 wrote...
Well in Stolen Throne, Wilhem checks Maric twice to see if he's really Maric. Since he's a circle mage, and likely wouldn't know about Shapeshifting, it's possible there are illusion-based ways to disguise someone.Firky wrote...
Is there any other DA lore way to disguise someone?
Hmm. I have a copy of Stolen Throne which I can't get into - but I'll go scour it for info. Ta.
Also - on the term "Mary Sue," I just learned that term recently (when someone pointed out I'd written one about a certain Witcher. Ahem.) My understanding is that Mary Sue is based on the writer and that she falls in love with some hunk. (Well, that was how it was used in my case. Rightly so.)
Modifié par Firky, 11 mai 2011 - 02:27 .
#9763
Posté 11 mai 2011 - 01:31
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Sue
Covers the origin and evolution of the term. It's descriptive rather than prescriptive - describes how the term is generally used, rather than some idea of its "proper" use. So yes, a Sue can be a direct self-insert or a proxy or a character who seems so full of wish-fulfillment fantasies that it's jarring.
ETA: Also a nice article: http://www.merrycoz....ers/MARYSUE.HTM
Mary Sue has apparently been around since the mid-19th century! (Yes, I know she's named for a character in a 1974 Star Trek fanfic... which I just read was supposed to be a satire, which I've never heard before!)
Modifié par Corker, 11 mai 2011 - 01:42 .
#9764
Posté 11 mai 2011 - 01:45
1) Any of those common Mary Sue traits? If you answer them 'yes BUT' then they probably don't apply.
2) It depends on the skill of the writer. Anything can seem trite and cliché if done wrong, whereas even 'mary sue' characters can be good if done right. So if a character has Mary Sue traits, work hard on those traits to make them fit.
#9765
Posté 11 mai 2011 - 02:15
It's very subjective. Some Mary Sues are a matter of taste. But there are some that aggravate practically everyone.
#9766
Posté 11 mai 2011 - 09:45
Anyway, I meant to ask, what is this Mary Sue litmus test? I feel like a lot of you have backgrounds in creative writing, and I only ever wrote academic papers, so I don't know all of these terms, like "purple" writing and Mary Sue.
#9767
Posté 11 mai 2011 - 09:54
Sues often have many things in common (unusual physical appearance, persecution and/or abusive backstory, extraordinary talents, special bonds to animals, etc) and the web quizzes just count how many cliches the character shares.
#9768
Posté 11 mai 2011 - 10:10
It is good for a laugh, however. Just like that
Modifié par Merilsell, 11 mai 2011 - 10:17 .
#9769
Posté 11 mai 2011 - 10:31
(*also makes note to never, ever ****** off Merilsell. Like, ever.*)
#9770
Posté 11 mai 2011 - 10:36
#9771
Posté 11 mai 2011 - 11:22
is my favorite. Although "a nectarian beverage" is interesting too. Seeing this description of purple prose and those examples awakes in me the need to shake the author by the shoulders and scream "SPILL IT OUT ALREADY!" Ugh.
(Aww, as you ever would. *hugs* You know I'm okay with negative critic if it is constructive. It helps me to get better after all. What I'm not okay with is unfounded, destructive b*tching just for the heck of it. Such behavior awakes my inner snarking monster, where I normally would shrug and walk away. I write this story because I love to do it, so I don't need someone waltzing over the things I like just because they get a lulz out of it. Okay eventually I'm the one lulzing now. To write this textwall of snark was truly invigorating, after all. Funny too. At least for me. Cough.)
#9772
Posté 11 mai 2011 - 11:40
okay, that is something I don't really do. My descriptions are usually pretty weak, lol. But is it a good or bad thing to do? I guess it depends on the taste of the reader? I for one get annoyed when an author spends two pages describing a plate or something ridiculous like that.
I did a Mary Sue test, my character is apparently a Mary Sue, yet I barely checked anything off. Merilsell I totally agree with you about it being BS.
#9773
Posté 12 mai 2011 - 12:04
I've seen it used on purpose for comic effect - "Isabela's friend-fiction" and the like, or lampoons of genres where it's a problem. And sometimes very stylized or intense description flirts with being purple prose, sort of on the line where some folks will think it's powerful, and some will think it's ludicrously over the top.
And quantity counts. "Tawny hair flowing like silk in the warm evening breeze" could be okay if it's out with plainer prose in a paragraph. Then it's florid but not insanely so. If there are also sparkling amethyst eyes, rippling muscles coiling in the moonlight, and a love vaster than the sea and higher than the stars, all in the same paragraph, you probably want to tone it down.
#9774
Posté 12 mai 2011 - 12:25
If there are also sparkling amethyst eyes, rippling muscles coiling in the moonlight, and a love vaster than the sea and higher than the stars, all in the same paragraph,
...is it getting warm in here?
Kidding!
#9775
Posté 12 mai 2011 - 12:42
Now, as for me writing a Mary Sue... *looks at Sophia Hawke GIF* ...yeah.





Retour en haut






