Deviija wrote...
What I find amusing about the nudity argument is that it rarely is about nudity and maturity in the game, but specifically about seeing female nudity in the game. The argument would hold a lot more weight, in my eyes, if it was about nudity/maturity in mature games for both males and females. Focusing on one gender isn't maturity, it becomes exploitation.
Problem with your desire is its not maturity or in a games best interest to show genitilia of any kind. Do that and you give the protesters fuel to the fire about game sanctioned porn.
Im all for a breast or nipple here and there if it makes the sex scenes more convincing and adds a
MATURE feeling to the game but I dont want to see some chick spread legs or a guy swinging in the wind as you request.
One is tasteful artistry and the other is basically porn. Porn is porn by any words you want to use.
So no, the arguement wouldnt hold more weight because you have a desire to see penises and vaginas. Thats not what the arguement/debate is about!
And for the record, in England they have topless girls as Sunshine Girls in the daily newspaper. Here in Ontatio Canada females are legally allowed to walk around topless if they so desire to. In fact, pretty much worldwide there is some type of toplessness legality! Is it your arguement the world is exploiting those women by giving them freedom of choice? Really its only the good ol USA thats all up in arms about breasts/chests and nipples.
But also pretty much worldwild, when it comes to the lower areas, thats porn and no one but you is interested in porn in this topic.
If this topic really was about porn, then those trolls that say to go look it up on the internet to get your fix would have a point. But thats
NOT what this about so as usual, they have no point worth mentioning.
Say
YES to
MATURE, tasteful, artistic love scenes
Say
NO to porn and overly explictive raunch better left on the XXX sites.