46 réponses à ce sujet

[gorgack]

The lack of side quest and expolation was very disappointing the frist one was much better in comparasion its not even amusing. No inventory not enough credits to get everything and when you beat the game there not to do no way to get more funds. The storys great and so are the characters it seems this game was finshed to soon its missing way to much not in the main story line but the side story by that I mean there's barly anything there. The level up systems and joke the frist one was much better and the power are little better just missing the power behide it. I wish bioware would take its time with a game insted of have assing it.

[Gorn Kregore]

your opinion is stupid

[blueTrance]

I'm replaying ME1 after playing 2 so I can transfer a level 60 save. The "exploration," i.e. driving around dead worlds finding mostly nothing looking for a few minerals, is making me want to kill myself. I wouldn't mind them bringing back some form of exploration, just as long as it's different from the way they were doing it in ME1.

[Inriri]

The lack of sidequests is somewhat sad, but they do have the potential to remedy that (and they are planning too, if their talks about the dlc with a vehicle is true). At what point is an inventory needed? You do have an "inventory" in the way of weapon lockers and the armor customization in Shepard's room. I think the bigger problem is the lack of armor/weapons available at the moment.

The level up system is basically the same as the first, but you get large experience points at the end of a mission instead of in progress. It is possible to level mid-mission if you're doing sidequests at the time and hand them in before finishing the main quest. The powers themselves are a lot more powerful from a visual standpoint, but I do feel Adepts have been shafted thoroughly on harder difficulties. That would be easily fixed with a patch.

Finally, I believe you are on the wrong forum

Edit: I have bought every single thing (plus the damn fish several times because I keep forgetting to feed them) and I still have quite a bit of credits left. You probably need to look around more carefully

Modifié par Inriri, 06 février 2010 - 10:26 .

[Ryngard]

I completely disagree with your points:



"The lack of side quest and expolation was very disappointing the frist one was much better in comparasion its not even amusing."



I'm sorry but driving around aimlessly was not my idea of fun. Nor was entering the SAME layout base 50 times to unlock the Ally achievements. PASS. At least each side quest in ME2 has a reason for being there.



"No inventory"

You don't NEED one. Why fill up your time sorting useless junk. You're given weapons and armor. What else do you need?



"not enough credits to get everything"

I've not had any trouble having enough credits. I bought out almost all stores and decided to not bother once I got close to the end as I had upgraded everything I needed to. AND I didn't do any (well I did 2 total) side missions.



"The level up systems and joke the frist one was much better and the power are little better just missing the power behide it"



I far prefer this one. It is sleek, streamlined, and each class has UNIQUE abilities. The "hybrid" classes are hybrid no longer, but fully functional unique classes. I like the skill evolution system as well.



"I wish bioware would take its time with a game insted of have assing it."



YOUR opinion.

[trl6999]

maybe all the missing quests will be DLC

[YakoHako]

Gorn Kregore wrote...

your opinion is stupid

This made me laugh.  And "lack of side quests"??  The whole damn game is side quests!

[serjwolf]

Ryngard wrote...



"No inventory"
You don't NEED one. Why fill up your time sorting useless junk. You're given weapons and armor. What else do you need?

I love ME2, its my favorite game ever, BUT the lack of inventory is an unmistakable flaw in the game for those who (like myself and many loyal fans) want a Shooter/RPG.  Instead of making this game have less clutter and useless looting, they just drop inventory off the face of the earth.

Modifié par serjwolf, 06 février 2010 - 10:45 .

[coinop25]

Please direct these posts to the appropriate forum. This is the "classes and Builds" forum, for discussing character development/optimization; the "Official Campaign Quests and Storylines" forum is dedicated to whining and complaining.

Thanks!

[Tyfreaky]

This post is in the wrong forums... if you want to talk about stupid builds, then go ahead....but this is not the appropriate forum for reviewing the game as a whole.

[SmilingMirror]

mass effects side quests all looked the same, ME2's sidequests all felt different.

[Booban]

Why should you need inventory to have an RPG?
I understand all RPGs seem to have them...and I hate the aspect in all of them I have ever played. Every time I had to go and try to pick up every piece of junk, try to figure out which was 'best' (not different, one was always best) and sell the rest at the store, usually making several trips because I couldn't carry everything. What role are you playing there?
If you want a shooter/RPG, as you define, well, go buy one. Apparently there are many out there.
Why should Bioware confine itself to conventional genres. Maybe it is making something new.

Modifié par Booban, 07 février 2010 - 03:25 .

[Average Gatsby]

This post doesn't belong here.

[Chromie]

Wrong board douche bad this is SPAM

[spartan5127]

ME2 has way better side quests than ME1, it doesn't even compare. Going into 15 identical warehouses and killing everything is only fun so many times. Its a quality vs quantity sort of thing. I prefer quality.

[SithLordExarKun]

I prefer quality > quantity.



I would rather lay 10 fantastic side quests than play 20 repetitive cut and paste side quests.

[Hizoka003]

ME2 is a shooter with dialog options.... ME1 was an RPG with shooting style combat... if i wanted another genric shooter i would get one of the eleventy billion shooters out there... i want a deep RPG... but it seems that genre of game is all but gone because of the XBox little kids that cannot play a game for more then 20 minutes at a time

[Rubber65Soul]

There are plenty of missions.. I didnt come close to finsihing everything in my first game and I still had 34 hours invested into it.. Which is more than any one game play of ME 1... The game is longer.. Even considering you waste a few hours mineral scanning.

One thing that shocked me was how much better the game is on a higher difficulty other than normal. My initial gripe was that the battles were great but too short. But once I bumped it up to veteran the intensity was back again. It seems almost like a different game. This is what was missing. Now I have more challenges to look forward to when I play the game over and over.

Modifié par SlowFingers69, 07 février 2010 - 03:20 .

[Solitas777]

YakoHako wrote...

Gorn Kregore wrote...

your opinion is stupid

This made me laugh.  And "lack of side quests"??  The whole damn game is side quests!

LOL! I couldnt agree more! That's my main complaint. Gameplay in ME2 is far superior. THe mechanics are better, cover system is good, load times are better, and the sidequests are great....except they take up the wole damn game!
Also, there is less fetch quests...im not sure if this is bad or not I like gettig right into the game, but it also takes a little away from the immersion factor (a report on the citadel can have you chasing down leads in another part of the galaxy in ME2...or you play detective and have to chase down clues. I thought the mission idea and the direction marker are wonderful editions that I wouldnt have minded taking up say 1/3 to 1/2 of the game..but I want a long interesting main quest!

[Solitas777]

YakoHako wrote...

Gorn Kregore wrote...

your opinion is stupid

This made me laugh.  And "lack of side quests"??  The whole damn game is side quests!

LOL! I couldnt agree more! That's my main complaint. Gameplay in ME2 is far superior. THe mechanics are better, cover system is good, load times are better, and the sidequests are great....except they take up the wole damn game!
Also, there is less fetch quests...im not sure if this is bad or not I like gettig right into the game, but it also takes a little away from the immersion factor (a report on the citadel can have you chasing down leads in another part of the galaxy in ME2...or you play detective and have to chase down clues. I thought the mission idea and the direction marker are wonderful editions that I wouldnt have minded taking up say 1/3 to 1/2 of the game..but I want a long interesting main quest!

[andrewv42]

Ryngard wrote...

I completely disagree with your points:

"The lack of side quest and expolation was very disappointing the frist one was much better in comparasion its not even amusing."

I'm sorry but driving around aimlessly was not my idea of fun. Nor was entering the SAME layout base 50 times to unlock the Ally achievements. PASS. At least each side quest in ME2 has a reason for being there.

"No inventory"
You don't NEED one. Why fill up your time sorting useless junk. You're given weapons and armor. What else do you need?

"not enough credits to get everything"
I've not had any trouble having enough credits. I bought out almost all stores and decided to not bother once I got close to the end as I had upgraded everything I needed to. AND I didn't do any (well I did 2 total) side missions.

"The level up systems and joke the frist one was much better and the power are little better just missing the power behide it"

I far prefer this one. It is sleek, streamlined, and each class has UNIQUE abilities. The "hybrid" classes are hybrid no longer, but fully functional unique classes. I like the skill evolution system as well.

"I wish bioware would take its time with a game insted of have assing it."

YOUR opinion.

The quoted post sums up all of my thoughts on this topic.

[entekk]

blueTrance wrote...

I'm replaying ME1 after playing 2 so I can transfer a level 60 save. The "exploration," i.e. driving around dead worlds finding mostly nothing looking for a few minerals, is making me want to kill myself. I wouldn't mind them bringing back some form of exploration, just as long as it's different from the way they were doing it in ME1.

you might be interested in this: masseffectsaves.com

[Hizoka003]

i like the gameplay better in ME2 but it still felt like it was a shooter trying to have RPG flare... rather then an RPG with shooter style combat... i finished the game with nearly every side quest done at 19.5 hours... IMO that way too damn short... especially when you look back at games like FF7 when even if you had a strat guide to tell you where exactly to go it still took you a min of 50 hours to complete..





ME2 main quest left like one of the planet quests of ME1 to me.. it just felt shallow, its like they cared more about you making your team then killing the collectors... in ME1 you have a clear goal, kill Seran, in ME2 you had no "bad guy" to go after... the bad guy of ME2 felt like the Geth of ME1 just pawns but without a leader to deal with...





i hope ME3 is a longer game... its getting kinda old paying 50 bucks for a game you can beat in less then a weekend.. there are TONS of bad things of WoW... but personally i still got 4 years out of it before i finally said screw it.. what happened to games being epic in length... i just cannot see paying 50 bucks for short games, they are not worth the money

[LtRadczek]

Honestly, I kinda view the loyalty missions as sidequests. If you view it in those regards, how could you possibly be disappointed with the sidequests?

Also, I'd MUCH rather have a few awesome sidequests then a lot of crappy sidequests. Seriously though, even though there aren't that many sidequests in ME2, all of them a re unique and fun in there own rights. Am I the only one who thought that one sidequest where your on a destroyed ship teetering over the edge of a cliff to be amazing?

Also, why is this thread in the Character builds forum?

Modifié par LtRadczek, 07 février 2010 - 04:41 .