CmdrFenix83 wrote...
Did you look at what your body was like before they began reconstruction? You were a just a hunk of charred flesh. They rebuilt you completely. *All* of your skin had to be regrown in its' entirety. If you had any scars from the first game carried over, it would mean that Miranda and Wilson intentionally put it back onto you.
They were only supposed to bring back your skills, personality, and morality. The scar you got as a battle trophy or something does absolutely nothing to define your character, so they didn't bother with it, period.
I think thats crap (in a nice way). both your first argument and your second one. I have had enough scars/tissue damage in my time to know that scars dont just go away because new skin grows, they'll go away with time if they are small, but massive tissue damage causes scarring it doen't remove it.
second and this is what i really want to speak to, is that all the scars on my body both big and small come with a story and more often that not a reminder. and i would never want to have them removed, and while they wouldn't "change" my personallity. a lack of seeing them on a daily bases might allow me to forget how and why i got them. like "make sure you wear a helmet ******", or "don't cut toward yourself, the knife might slip".
for my shepard i was a war hero and I always invisioned i got that scar on my eye during the skyllian blitz, and it reminded me of the possible cost of saving the galaxies, and gave the game depth which is important to me.
regardless its a game and no scar didn't detrackt from the gaming experience, but it doesn't cost bioware anything to let you have a scar either (especially when many of their other games allow scars)
Modifié par The Bull84, 11 février 2010 - 06:13 .
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut
