yorkj86 wrote...
Flamewielder wrote...
yorkj86 wrote...
I wonder what it says that Samara ranks higher than Jack in character-appeal. Apart from Jack's harsh physical appearance, does Samara's harsh morality really grate people less than Jack's confrontational personality?
Or is it because players feel a lawful neutral justicar is easier to manage than a chaotic neutral rogue? As the SB points out in his assessment of Samara, her Justicar code makes her mission outcomes predictable... something that you really can't say about Jack.
I always thought Jack was the only squaddie Shepard would never let out of his sight... All the others could be trusted to behave themselves to some extent; Jack's the only one requiring guidance (along with friendship/love).
That's probably right. Jack's chaotic nature, and her power, make her a danger to the team, regardless of Shepard's alignment. At least with Samara, the player knows where she stands.
Honestly, I think personality is more relevant. Jack, at the heart of her character, is a criminal. A smaller fanbase is going to accrue to Jack because of that aspect of her character, one that largely defines her personality.
I'm not saying Jack isn't a good character, if you take the time to listen to all her dialog she makes it plain that she can be honorable. The Space Station story is the one I am referring to.
Samara, for most people, is moral, right up front. Yeah she is black and white and yeah she can be more harsh than many criminals, but the superficial aspect of her character, the fact that she is defined as moral, helps alleviate a lot of concerns.
With Jack you have to look closely to really get to like her as a person, but with Samara you have to look closely to find things wrong.