Samara is likely convinced paragon Shep is a good person. She can also be convinced renegade Shep should be put down as an unjust person, according to the Code...
But any person attacking Shepard without just cause is "unjust". In some cases, it could be argued that the enemies are actually enforcing some legitimate "No Trespassing" rule, but those are in the minority.
Also, to clarify my perception expressed in my previous post:
Laws vary according to the land you visit. Early pre-spaceflight asari city states likely had similar laws with some local variations which the Justicars would have had to deal with. In order for the Code to be universally accepted/tolerated, it must also include a mean for the Justicar to apply the Code while minimizing conflict with local authority. The Oath of Subsumation appears to serve this purpose: if the local ruler(s) is judged to be well-intentionned ("just") according to set criteria, the Justicar is allowed to swear an Oath of Subsumation to smooth potential conflict with "imperfect but working towards the Code's purpose" local authorities.
Similarily, local jurisdictions likely made provisions for interactions with Justicars, something facilitated by the Justicar's obligation to "register with local authorities". By doing so, they allow their actions/decisions to be documented so that law enforcement officers can legitimately accept the Justicar's judgement (as opposed to taking for granted the word of some random vigilante). In ancient days, this might have involved the issuance of a "letter of marque" to the visiting Justicar by the local rulership, signifying the rulers' acceptance and recognition of the Justicar's authority.
In Samara's specific case on Illium, Samara's word was enough to render two questionably aquired pieces of evidence receivable in court (i.e. proof of Pitne For's smuggling activities, and incrimination of Dakni Kur's murderess, Elnora).
The reason Samara did not swear an Oath of Subsummation to the Illium's "top cop" (something that would have saved them a LOT of trouble) is likely that Illium authorities (with its morally questionnable "laws") were not judged to be "just", allowing innocents to be exploited because the missed the fine print or a deliberate loophole in the countract they signed, etc... Still, local law-enforcement accepted her judgement even after being ordered to hold her against her will.
Modifié par Flamewielder, 11 novembre 2010 - 05:19 .





Retour en haut





