oh hai Samaritans

long time no see.
I was perusing through sports news earlier this morning and saw an interesting story that reminded me of Samara and the Code. Basically, a BYU basketball player was kicked off the team for violating the schools code of conduct, which is to not have pre-marital sex. It is a conservative code that also instructs to live a virtuous life of honesty, regular church visits, abstaining from alcohol and drugs, even tea and coffee. The student in question had sex with his girlfriend, which he admitted to, and further disciplinary actions are to follow.
Not that I'm comparing the code of conduct to Samara's Code, but ideologically this issue raises the same debates, and one that we've encountered countless times as a criticism of Samara. On one side, people argue that the code itself is flawed and anyone who abides by it or enforces it is hypocritical, morally speaking. On the other hand, you have people say that once a person commits to said code, its not about what's right or wrong, its about commitment.
Commitment.This is among the things Samara fans value the most in her character, and what critics question. The character is written as an archetypical representation of commitment within a grey world. You are supposed to question the feasibility of the Code, and it is even admitted that the Code has never been updated so its not like its practicality is of the highest order, but you cannot simply discount a character who has chosen the path it dictates. The BYU player for whatever reason did not have a serious commitment to the code of conduct (unless he can convince a jury that he 'accidently had sex') and the enforcers did what they had to do, which is take a tough stand. This is similar to how I'm sure Justicars are taught the Code, to uphold its judgment without wavering, and without being serious about the commitment there is no point in even trying to undertake the training.
There's two kinds of people on this issue, how appropriate that the issue divides those into black and white. There's the ones who won't question commitment when the responsibility has been taken, and the ones who can't help but backtrack. They use the private institution that is the Order to harp on the implications it has on the public environment. Its evident that cultural indoctrination fostered by a climate of extremism has
pervasive effects on society, but it just does not apply to Samara's arc, nor the Code. Critics should look at the character arc, instead of the character base if they want to evaluate Samara. What they will find is a character riddled in the clash of moral dilemma's, who by necessity exhibits one side of the fight.
Anyway, that's what the news story remined me of. I may pop in later to see what you all have to say