Aller au contenu

Photo

Are you serious Bioware?


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
101 réponses à ce sujet

#26
Grand_Commander13

Grand_Commander13
  • Members
  • 987 messages
I'll note that I should hate the game because of one shoddy texture.

#27
Killian Kalthorne

Killian Kalthorne
  • Members
  • 640 messages
So? I don't see the point of being so anal about useless eye candy.

#28
Clova

Clova
  • Members
  • 225 messages
Male, i saw that. Thing is, when taken in with the rest of the picture, its barely noticable. I could care less however, as the graphics AS A WHOLE are better then ME1. I much rather have a perfect face than perfect armor, as im going to be looking at the face a hell of a lot more.

#29
jskiles111

jskiles111
  • Members
  • 14 messages

Malevolence65 wrote...

Obviously, none of you can see what I'm talking about, so I cropped the rest of the image out.

That is BARELY acceptable for last-gen games. I just helped my brother with Twilight Princess earlier today, and its clothing/armor textures don't have any sort of blockyness like that armor does.


Don't play the game if you're so disgusted by looking at it.

#30
Zackariahas

Zackariahas
  • Members
  • 106 messages
Gameplay > Graphics



Both are great in this game.

#31
illerianna

illerianna
  • Members
  • 398 messages
A bad texture? OH NOES! Better cancel my order!!!111!!111!!!

#32
Malevolence65

Malevolence65
  • Members
  • 680 messages
 Mass Effect 2 is a great looking game, but when you look at armor/clothing textures close-up, like you do during all conversations, a very large part of the gameplay, it doesn't look very good at all. I can't remember any of Half Life 2's clothing textures having blocks that big, and it came out 6 years ago.

#33
Killian Kalthorne

Killian Kalthorne
  • Members
  • 640 messages
I don't see the big deal.

#34
Grand_Commander13

Grand_Commander13
  • Members
  • 987 messages
Go play Red Orchestra: your eyes will bleed. Then realize that someone not caught up in the graphics horse race considers those graphics to be pretty good.

#35
dragonic9100

dragonic9100
  • Members
  • 206 messages
i see what your talking about but i don't see why this is a problem, in the original picture i really had to look to see what you ment

#36
Erruk

Erruk
  • Members
  • 95 messages
They used pinking shears on the fabric, you dope.

#37
hex23

hex23
  • Members
  • 743 messages
You didn't answer my question. What card do you have?



And here's up close:



Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image



Maybe get a better graphics card.

#38
Gorn Kregore

Gorn Kregore
  • Members
  • 636 messages

Zackariahas wrote...

Gameplay > Graphics


Murphy's Law of 21st Century gaming. Graphics are more important than gameplay, story or plot, combined in a video game amongst the majority.

#39
Chicxulub_T.First

Chicxulub_T.First
  • Members
  • 4 messages
So what? Beeg deal.
Graphics do not a game make.
I still play, and greatly enjoy, Deus Ex and System Shock 2.

People have made better textures for both games. They look better. It improves the games less than tweaking the brightness and contrast.

Every moment diverted to eye candy hurts depth. Fewer or shorter side missions. Fewer dialog choices. Less of what makes ME2, ME2. Would you have preferred a June release with better textures?

#40
Malevolence65

Malevolence65
  • Members
  • 680 messages

hex23 wrote...

You didn't answer my question. What card do you have?

And here's up close:

Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image

Maybe get a better graphics card.

I have an ATI 5770. It's a good card. The screenshots you posted are of very important characters, of course their clothing's texture quality is going to be good.

#41
Clova

Clova
  • Members
  • 225 messages

Gorn Kregore wrote...

Zackariahas wrote...

Gameplay > Graphics


Murphy's Law of 21st Century gaming. Graphics are more important than gameplay, story or plot, combined in a video game amongst the majority.


In which case, those people should go see Avatar and other such graphical wonders instead of playing a game! Posted Image

#42
AliasGrey

AliasGrey
  • Members
  • 15 messages
Of all the whine threads, this one is the most comical.

#43
Veex

Veex
  • Members
  • 1 007 messages

Malevolence65 wrote...

The screenshots you posted are of very important characters, of course their clothing's texture quality is going to be good.


So screen shots of throw away characters you encounter in a close up conversation once is integral to your playing experience?

#44
jskiles111

jskiles111
  • Members
  • 14 messages
Starting to think OP is trolling.

#45
Pocketgb

Pocketgb
  • Members
  • 1 466 messages
You running film grain, hex23? Looks tasty.

Anyways, a low-res spot of armor here and there doesn't bother me too much (although the scientist suits can look pretty dreadful), it's the occassional icky lighting you get on ocassion. Like after you talk to the Illusive Man for the first time, the lighting at that part is pretty awful.

But this is nothing compared to what the rest of the game has to offer. Everything is pretty top-notch, even for a port.

Now how come this game can look better than Dragon Age AND run almost twice as smoothly?

Modifié par Pocketgb, 08 février 2010 - 12:38 .


#46
acrh2

acrh2
  • Members
  • 59 messages

Pocketgb wrote...

You running film grain, hex23? Looks tasty.

Anyways, a low-res spot of armor here and there doesn't bother me too much (although the scientist suits can look pretty dreadful), it's the occassional icky lighting you get on ocassion. Like after you talk to the Illusive Man for the first time, the lighting at that part is pretty awful.

But this is nothing compared to what the rest of the game has to offer. Everything is pretty top-notch, even for a port.

Now how come this game can look better than Dragon Age AND run almost twice as smoothly?


Low poly count with a lot of bumpmapping to hide that.
The game does slow down a bit in heavy poly count scenes, say, in Garrus's warehouse mission.

#47
hex23

hex23
  • Members
  • 743 messages

Pocketgb wrote...

You running film grain, hex23? Looks tasty.

Anyways, a low-res spot of armor here and there doesn't bother me too much (although the scientist suits can look pretty dreadful), it's the occassional icky lighting you get on ocassion. Like after you talk to the Illusive Man for the first time, the lighting at that part is pretty awful.

But this is nothing compared to what the rest of the game has to offer. Everything is pretty top-notch, even for a port.

Now how come this game can look better than Dragon Age AND run almost twice as smoothly?


No sir. 1440x900, 4x AA via nHancer, 16x anisotropic filtering. All the goodies in the config utility turned on too.

#48
TheConfidenceMan

TheConfidenceMan
  • Members
  • 244 messages
This is a console game. You think they're going to create higher-res assets for the PC when they can't even bother hotkeying the journal?

#49
Zackariahas

Zackariahas
  • Members
  • 106 messages

AliasGrey wrote...

Of all the whine threads, this one is the most comical.


These forums need more cheese...

#50
Jaron Oberyn

Jaron Oberyn
  • Members
  • 6 755 messages
Cry me a river. You are acting immature. Seriously? This isn't any fault to them. The company who created the engine they're using has the same quality on their character's armor up close. Just play GoW2 and UT3. Stop acting like a spoiled brat. If that keeps you from playing a good game, then its your loss.