"RAGGGGGGHHHHH"
Modifié par Justin2k, 08 février 2010 - 01:08 .
Modifié par Handsome Hank, 08 février 2010 - 01:16 .

Modifié par Malevolence65, 08 février 2010 - 01:25 .
Guest_Crawling_Chaos_*
Handsome Hank wrote...
I suppose it's to be expected here, but there are too many bioware apologists on this forum. I love bioware's games - all of them. But I don't understand why anybody would come on to a thread and try and mock somebody for making a viable complaint. Many of the textures in many of bioware's games are subpar. Perhaps people have just come to expect that from bioware? Or is it just fanboy syndrome? I don't know. I don't get it.
Thank you. Oh, and please, everyone. Right click on the image I posted several posts before this, copy the image url, and open it in a new tab or window. I'd like to see the argument you have against me after seeing that image up close.BiancoAngelo7 wrote...
I totally agree with the OP, all the time they were developing ME2 they said they were working on the issues with the low quality tetures, and with bigger things, including our armor and personal looks they hit it right on the nail.
However, with colors and tetures for other npcs they basically did copy/paste from ME1 to ME2. Its dissapointing and really distracting from the immersion when a Turian has a realistic face and then two inches below his chin hes got a ladder diagonal line instead of something DECENT forget high quality.
It really is unacceptable, no matter how you look at it, especially when Nintendo doesnt even do that on OLDER games.
Malevolence65 wrote...
I'm starting to think it's a bug. Bioware couldn't possibly be dumb enough to show that nicely textured helmet right above that terrible looking armor.
Oh, and to see the full effect, right click on the image, copy the image url, and paste it into a new tab.
hex23 wrote...
You didn't answer my question. What card do you have?
And here's up close:
Maybe get a better graphics card.
Don't worry, it's not. Mass Effect 2 is still my favorite game, but I'm disappointed that some of the textures are of such a low quality.EverteMax wrote...
I know what the thread starter is talking about. But, it really is a minor issue because these low textures are the mercs' armors, and I dun really remember seeing them elsewhere except on the 3 merc band soldiers. The supporting characters do have lower textures in terms of their costumes. However, the texture on the places u frequent the most, like the normandy...and your characters are really well done.
I can see your point, but it isn't that wide spread throughout the game. I sure hope you don't let it spoil your mood.
RighteousRage wrote...
The shoulder pads on Kelly look pretty foul, so your point is moot, also all these characters are primary ones that people are expected to be staring at for 20+ minutes each, so it's no surprise that the textures' resolutions are 3-4 times that of the turian guy. It's just a corner cutting method, hoping that people will mostly be looking at the main characters, and in your case, they were successful.
Guest_MrHimuraChan_*
Modifié par MrHimuraChan, 08 février 2010 - 03:49 .
hex23 wrote...
The shoulder pads look fine and my point stands.
You see "that Turian guy" maybe 5 minutes. The same can be said for any of the other supposedly poorly textured characters. Out of all the things that could be criticized about "ME2"....and there is a few, I love the game but it's not perfect....this is extremely low on the list. It shouldn't even be on the list.
Something along the lines of 500+ characters and we're seriously sitting here splitting hairs over low res textures on characters you see for 5 minutes in a 30+ hour game?
Really?