22 réponses à ce sujet

[ranger smith]

The Game.














Jack > You.

[Endurance_117]

lol, best thread on this forum

[Red Viking]

The thing about The Game is that it's made so that winning is impossible.  When people discover that a game, any game is unwinnable, they either quit playing or cheat.

That said, I declare myself the winner of The Game.  You can keep playing if you want, but I'm out.

Modifié par Red Viking, 08 février 2010 - 07:00 .

[noobzor99]

I hate you

[Soruyao]

I'm commander shepard, and this is my favorite topic on the forum!

[Frotality]

except im not playing the game with anybody... so i lost...to myself?!

[StlAjax]

Jack<Me



Jack<Dog Crap



Jack=Tranny



Therefore Jack lost.

[ranger smith]

You sir, obviously do not know Jack.













Jack > You.

[StlAjax]

ranger smith wrote...

You sir, obviously do not know Jack.






Jack > You.

You as a collective or you as a singular. Because if it is as a collective, well you are definately wrong because Jack is a Transvestite. Same theory applies for a singular. 

[fieldmob742]

Me > Tranny

[ranger smith]

You = You;
Jack = Jack;

Jack > You.
think of it as a static const.

Therefore:

if(You == You && Jack == Jack)
   bJackGreaterThanYou = true;

since this if statement will always return true, Jack will always be greater than You.

Therefore:

Jack > You.

Modifié par ranger smith, 08 février 2010 - 08:42 .

[fieldmob742]

Jack = Died on final mission

Me = Lived

Me > Jack

Modifié par fieldmob742, 08 février 2010 - 08:49 .

[The Demonologist]

Well, we've been served.



Oh my.

[ranger smith]

"Jack = Died on final mission
Me = Lived
Me > Jack"

You are not understanding the concept of "const". Jack cannot change, it is constant, Jack = Jack.

[StlAjax]

You're thinking is illogical. Jack in this equation is a variable; therefore, it cannot be proved by making it equal to itself. I can then substitute any real number and/or equation for the value of Jack. In this instance Jack will be equal to the value of You minus 5. Therefore, no matter what number you substitute for You, Jack is always less than that value. Hence, Jack < You. I will intern substitute the term Me for the term You. So that means Me=You. So by transitive property, Jack < Me

Modifié par StlAjax, 08 février 2010 - 06:24 .

[ranger smith]

"You're thinking is illogical. Jack in this equation is a variable; therefore, it cannot be proved by making it equal to itself. I can then substitute any real number and/or equation for the value of Jack. In this instance Jack will be equal to the value of You minus 5. Therefore, no matter what number you substitute for You, Jack is always less than that value. Hence, Jack < You. I will intern substitute the term Me for the term You. So that means Me=You. So by transitive property, Jack < Me"

Even Legion can see my logic. Jack is a variable, yes, but again, it is a static constant set to equal itself, therefore it retains it's value at all times and cannot be changed. You may google this if you like but it is correct.

[ranger smith]

"You're thinking is illogical. Jack in this equation is a variable; therefore, it cannot be proved by making it equal to itself. I can then substitute any real number and/or equation for the value of Jack. In this instance Jack will be equal to the value of You minus 5. Therefore, no matter what number you substitute for You, Jack is always less than that value. Hence, Jack < You. I will intern substitute the term Me for the term You. So that means Me=You. So by transitive property, Jack < Me"

Even Legion can see my logic. Jack is a variable, yes, but again, it is a static constant set to equal itself, therefore it retains it's value at all times and cannot be changed. You may google this if you like but it is correct.

[wikkedjoker]

oh but true masters of the game can talk about the game and not lose, but you buy activity playing the game have retroactively lost.

[wikkedjoker]

Joker>You

[StlAjax]

Yes Jack retains the value of Jack; however, if Jack is equal to the value of You minus 5, then Jack<You. And You is equal to Me; therefore, Jack<Me

[Chris Priestly]

And closed.


LOCKDOWN!

[StlAjax]

StlAjax wrote...

Yes Jack retains the value of Jack; however, if the value of Jack is equal to the value of You minus 5, then Jack<You. And You is equal to Me; therefore, Jack<Me