KAT4N4 wrote...
Jimmy Fury wrote...
KAT4N4 wrote...
Ok, there are more "practicing" bisexual women than "practicing" bisexual men. It is more socially acceptable and women are more attractive/aesthetically pleasing overall.
In that case I disagree. My proof is in your NYT article.
1.7% of men identify as bisexual.
1.5% of women identify as bisexual.
You can't claim an article is bullsh*t and then use its content to defend your argument. I mean those numbers are clearly bogus. Bisexual women are very common.
In regards to it being more socially acceptable to be a bisexual male than a bisexual female. Look at the media, porn, people's openness to sexuality. The same people who say gay people should burn in hell watch FFM threesomes and F/F porn all the time. Girls all the time talk about how women are beautiful and how they would have sex with people like Angelina Jolie, yet it is difficult to get a straight man to admit that Brad Pitt is a good looking guy. Bisexual Female: "Sexy - Bisexual Male: "Freakier than just gay" by our society's standards.
Woah woah woah I never said the article was bull****. Someone else did, not me.
And if you want to bring porn statistics into this, the gay porn industry is dominated by gay-for-pay stars.
Aaaand saying you'd have sex with Angelina Jolie doesn't make you bisexual. It means you have a libido and 2 eyes that function properly lol. (well... young Angelina... before she adopted half the planet's orphans)
Anyway, you claimed there were more bisexual women than men. I provided numbers from a source
you cited as evidence that the claim is incorrect.
Social perception is irrelivant. We're talking numbers.