Aller au contenu

Photo

how is saving the base wrong


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
256 réponses à ce sujet

#251
Wynne

Wynne
  • Members
  • 1 612 messages

Hopefire wrote...

-The base could have been created to serve as a giant processing plant, and part of what it processes is sentient beings. Beyond to turn them into Reapers, that is. The base might be designed to convert a sentient race into a client slave race.

Yeah--we don't know how they did what they did to the Protheans. The base might have been designed to do it, and by the time the researchers find that out it might already be too late. Maybe it's there to prime organic beings for mental dominance by Reapers, a sort of incubator for their future slaves' minds.

The Illusive Man didn't sound like someone who would proceed with incredible caution and care. He seemed like a man possessed, a man driven by fear and the knowledge that no other organization in the galaxy is doing anything about the greatest threat organic life has ever, ever known.

I can't blame him for his emotions--he's the proverbial one-eyed man in the land of the blind--but knowing what Shepard has known... seeing what she's seen... even though he's intelligent and astute, he hasn't been in the field enough to know what he was dealing with. He wasn't out there fighting husks. He didn't speak with Saren or the indoctrinated salarians. He didn't find the many groups of researchers decimated and maddened by mere proximity to Reaper tech. It's addictive, alluring, and subtle. Who knows how those "sleeper agents" Vigil spoke of were made? The ones who infiltrated groups of their own kind, convincingly, and then "betrayed them to the machines"?

He wasn't there on that derelict Reaper to see the destruction that simply being on an inactive, eons-dead Reaper ship had caused. And he did not sound reasonable. And he commanded Miranda to stop me before turning back to stridently plead his case again. He sounded as if the question he was asking himself for so long, can we really win this war, was starting to get to him.

If he were really holding on to his sanity and being as responsible and cautious as is necessary in the face of epic horror, he would have been reasoning with me. Asking me why I believed it was a bad idea, trying to discuss the matter and showing a bit of trust in Shepard's judgment rather than acting as he did.

Psython wrote...

There is no evidence that the base
can indoctrinate without its reaper host.
...
The moral duty to save all life is
worth the risk. I think there is more of a chance that more people will
die without the base than with. Its either elimination by the reapers
or elimination by base we are facing, but by saving the base there is a
greater chance for sucess also.
...
Desperate times call for desperate
measures. Stopping the reapers means making tough decisions and not
getting bogged down in moralizing. Besides, there is no such thing as
right or wrong anyways, its all relative.

Wait wait wait wait wait wait wait--did I just read you saying there is NO EVIDENCE that the base can indoctrinate without its Reaper host? How about Harbinger's remote possessions? How about the derelict Reaper, eons-dead but STILL ticking, STILL making twisted servants out of researchers? That's not proof, but it's certainly evidence.

The "moral duty" to save all life... would getting the entire galaxy indoctrinated be saving all life? That's the strong possibility you're looking at. It again comes down to what you thinking save all life is--is it saving the actual physical bodies even if they end up like the Collectors? I certainly don't think that's a future worth "saving." I think Saren was wrong about slavery and brainwashing being preservation of any kind.

You say you are not about getting bogged down in moralizing and there's no such thing as right or wrong, when just a short ways before that you said "moral duty to save all life." That's not really working out, man.

"Making the tough decision" is what I call destroying a piece of tech that might be useful because the risks outweigh the benefits. It's not "getting bogged down in moralizing" to say that it's too damned dangerous and pointless to throw away brilliant minds on a death trap made by beings thousands of times more sophisticated than your own brain will ever be. Like a child messing with Dad's rocket launcher, you don't know what you're dealing with just because you've handled a bb gun before.

Your worst case scenario is weak. Here's a real worst case scenario. The Reapers manage to use the base to transform the researchers into indoctrinated sleeper agents, or agents of Saren's ilk--not husks but intelligent beings with their memories, personalities, bodies and minds mostly intact, who managed to be as convincing to the rest of the galaxy as Saren was in your meeting with the Council. They infiltrate all of galactic society and invisibly prepare it for the invasion. By the time we're ready to use the Reaper tech against them, overconfident and falsely secure in the knowledge that we can really win now, they have taken out all our communications systems and dismantled the best of our own tech through the use of their agents, and by the time we realize they've gutted all our defenses it's too late to do anything but scream in futile agony as they tear us apart.

There's your real worst case scenario and that is why this is such a hard question to answer. Because the risks of the tech are incredibly large--they may pay off in a crucial way, or they may bring unnecessary destruction and ruin all your chances.

ziggehunderslash wrote...

I believe the reason they were
making a human Reaper was due to something Legion says. Using Reaper
technology, the mass effect generators and the Citadel is the entire
basis of the Reaper plan, forcing technological evolution down
pre-defined paths. While not something left for that purpose, it is
based on the same sets of technology.
...
the endgame Big Bad was, I feel, an
attempt to combat this threat by recreating the capacity in one of
their own.

That's a fascinating statement. I think you might well be right about that.

I think it's also interesting to note that the Protheans were destroyed just about the time they had almost unlocked the secret of mass relay technology. The same thing seemed to be happening to the current civilization; there's that asari bartender who ended up on Ilium because she had said they should be studying mass relay tech. Could the emergence of human species and those leaps you were talking about be the reason that Sovereign decided it was time to wipe out organic life again? I wonder if they feared organic life finding the Collector base, or whether something about mass relay technology has been the key to destroying them all along...

#252
lhr poptart

lhr poptart
  • Members
  • 8 messages

Jax Sparrow wrote...

I agree with most of the reasons already stated on why saving the Harbinger base for Timmy is a baaaddd idea. Though to maybe clarify:

- ) High Probability prolonged exposure to reaper tech seems to indoctrinate by default.
- ) Using tech that Reapers 'don't' know about is a better idea.
- ) The Harbinger Base and vessels are literally evil personified... like N4z! or KKK evil.
- ) Timmy is a baaaddd duuudddeee...

I have a hunch that he is one of the surviving Prothean scientists from Illos. He clearly has had major body parts replaced with synthetic organic hybrid tech. Which would explain why he is so obsessively myopic.



WOW. that last part REALLY made me stop and think for a minute. that could be a possibility... TIM being a prothean. somehow someway.... Enough time to a hold a pretty big grudge.

#253
Ziggeh

Ziggeh
  • Members
  • 4 360 messages

Wynne wrote...
I think it's also interesting to note that the Protheans were destroyed just about the time they had almost unlocked the secret of mass relay technology. The same thing seemed to be happening to the current civilization; there's that asari bartender who ended up on Ilium because she had said they should be studying mass relay tech. Could the emergence of human species and those leaps you were talking about be the reason that Sovereign decided it was time to wipe out organic life again? I wonder if they feared organic life finding the Collector base, or whether something about mass relay technology has been the key to destroying them all along...

They use the reliance on the relays to cut off supplies and reinforcements, so reaching point of mastery is quite likely the key condition in them firing up a Reaping. Humans didn't seem that close, but you could well be right, unpredictability would lead them to be cautious. Clearly the protheans, though advanced, were slow learners.

Makes it all a nice parable as well, standing upon your own two feet, finding your own path etc. This is the reason I don't use GPS or ask for directions. I may be hopelessly lost, but damn it if I'm not lost in my own way.

#254
Archilochos

Archilochos
  • Members
  • 70 messages
The problem of the Collector Base is complicated by its status as both an ethical and strategic issue.  First you've got to cope with question 1: Absolute vs. situational approach - Categorical imperative, or no?  If yes, then Q 2: Is this technology inherently evil?  If no, then Q 3: Can I trust TIM with it? etc. etc.

There's a lot going on here.  I destroyed the base, for a number of reasons.  On the ethical end - I don't think any sort of knowledge is inherently evil / detrimental, because even if it has only harmful applications, you don't have to use it.  We all know how to stab someone.  That doesn't compel us to actually do it.  TIM, however, is NOT trustworthy, and he's the only one we're able to give the base to.  The base has the capacity to communicate with the Reapers.  Recalling ME1, Saren was essentially attempting to cut a deal with the Reapers to insure the survival of some organics (not humans).  Saren and TIM are similar personalities - Kissinger style real politikers, serious any means necessary types.  TIM's goal is, after all, "The advancement of humanity.  Nothing more, nothing less."  This makes TIM a potential Reaper agent - he would almost certainly be willing to sell out other species to save humanity.  However, as Saren learned in the end, the Reapers are also Kissinger style real politikers, and will certainly lie and/or break their word.  At best, humanity might become the new collecters.  Yay.  On balance, I thought it more ethical to destroy the base than turn it over to a reactionary, racist, clandestine organization with no apparent unifrom code of ethics, no oversight, no accountability and unlimited resources.

Then there's the strategic element.  The base, as Shep points out, is not portable.  There's only 1 Reaper IFF available, so only 1 ship can make the crossing.  Forget the fear of indoctrination - though that is a concern - and focus on basic military strategy.  On one side, (at least for now) we have Shep + friends, plus Cerberus.  On the other, an unknown (Sovereign: "We are legion.") number of immortal super-advanced sentient beings with totally unknown resources, godlike technology, who may or may not be operating in multiple galaxies (if they live in dark space, why limit themselves to the Milky Way?  They could be doing their reaping in hundreds or even thousands of galaxies.)  Shep + company are fighting a guerilla war.  If Shep gives the base to TIM, can TIM hold it?  No.  Of course not.  The victory at the Collector base is basically a successful guerilla raid.  Shep + friends can't hold the line against the Reapers in a conventional war.  TIM has no hope of holding the base if the Reapers want it back.  Therefore, the best strategy is to deny the base to the enemy by destroying and leaving.

#255
RhythmlessNinja

RhythmlessNinja
  • Members
  • 369 messages
Human smoothie factory sounds good. Do it for humanity.

#256
Purebrawn

Purebrawn
  • Members
  • 21 messages
I actually felt worse when I blew the base up versus when I saved it. When I blew it up I was thinking, well there goes a possible advantage against the Reaper fleet. I just condemned the Galaxy to death. When I saved it I was thinking, hell ya baby its go time now. POWER!!

- Blowing it up only works cause you know Bioware is going to bail you out against the Reapers somehow.     Realistically... you would keep that base, it's your only shot :)

Modifié par Purebrawn, 12 février 2010 - 07:52 .


#257
FlintlockJazz

FlintlockJazz
  • Members
  • 2 710 messages

Xandurpein wrote...

FlintlockJazz wrote...

So let's just agree we all have our own reasons to believe that the course of action we have each taken is legit now.


I agree completely with the last sentence. We have imperfect knowledge, and because of that it's possible to argue either way. Neither keeping the base nor blowing it up can be dismissed as the obviously worst or most evil choice. Both choices can potentially result in disaster or salvation.


Heh yeah I should have just posted that last line instead of writing that huge essay that essentially said the same thing in more words.  Need to learn to cut down on my typing. :D

Fulgrim88 wrote...

FlintlockJazz wrote....
I really shouldn't bother, but I will just add this thing in.  First
off, both will be possible yes, the human race will survive whether you
blow up the base or not, however that does not mean there will be not
be repercussions for blowing up the base or that keeping it is indeed
bad, despite what those who claim that blowing it up is pure
meta-gaming say, there can be some very bad results for blowing it up,
such as Shepard having to sacrifice himself to stop the reapers as
opposed to getting the 'Big Gun' to defeat them without dying (it's the
last one in the trilogy, they can kill of the main character if they so
choose and have caused that option in DA:O). 

I have already
explained why I feel that it is possible ingame to decide to blow up
the base logically without metagaming, so let me just end with the fact
that keeping the base can also be taken as metagaming: you know nothing
bad will come of it because they can't cause an autoloss from having
it, despite the possible threat keeping a Reaper base like that is to
everyone.  So let's just agree we all have our own reasons to believe
that the course of action we have each taken is legit now.

Heh. Looks like the frustrating part about this threads got you, too.
I
didn't mean to. Guess my anger about the ME1 ending and the more
shortsighted members of the "blow it up"-crowd got me again. While a
part of me wishes that people, who blew the only piece of proof &
information to bits just to say "[smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/tongue.png[/smilie]"
to TIM get punished, i can't demand the same for people who came to the
same conclusion out of actual reasoning. The stuff i wrote back on page
8 is still paramount.
Equally bad & good consequences for both decisions, and i'm satisfied


Heh yeah I think we were actually arguing for the same thing we were just coming at it from opposite ends, or something like that. :D