183 réponses à ce sujet

[Llandaryn]

Burdokva wrote...

It doesn't look like breasts to me, the Turians have a chest-plate of sorts - look at this concept: http://i39.tinypic.com/e8u4o3.jpg

Man, the Krogans must be kicking themselves for losing the Rebellions to Skeletor.

[Funkcase]

Yes that wouldnt be so hard now wouldnt it Bioware! lol. I like this idea of a female Turian.

[Cutlass Jack]

Thats a great look!

[Lonely_Fat_Guy]

seems good, finaly a male - female turian romance!



as for the salarian female, it says that those stay on the homeplanet, so thats why there no female ones i geus

[OH-UP-THIS!]

Squack-Meow............let's only hope not.

[tmp7704]

Burdokva wrote...

It doesn't look like breasts to me, the Turians have a chest-plate of sorts - look at this concept: http://i39.tinypic.com/e8u4o3.jpg

Suspect that drawing (female Turian one, not the concept sketch) leaves it ambiguous on purpose. That said, would prefer no breasts on turian females or if they insist on some then at least hope they don't just copy humans. Nature has more than one way to arrange that particular piece of anatomy, even on our own Earth.

Modifié par tmp7704, 12 février 2010 - 07:58 .

[Roninraver]

Culwch wrote...

Quarians, who seem to share at least some of their physiology with Turians, do have breasts. If Turians are mammal analogues, it would more or less make sense for females to be built like that.

I would expect Salarian females to be flat-chested, though.

The structure of their DNA is similar, based upon the same amino acid chains.  That does not mean that they should share morphological traits and display sexual dimorphism in the same way.

Humans and fish have similar DNA structures, and are based upon the same amino acids.  Morphologically are we similar?  In a few ways.  Do our secondary sexual characteristics translate?  Certainly not, and we're far more closely related than Turians and Quarians would be.

Quarians evolved from something that one can only assume was a mammalian species.  Turians we know for a fact are not mammals.
That said I have to agree with the space birds guy.  Our planet's morphological guidelines do not necessarily apply, for all we know the mounds on a Turian female's chest could be hatcheries, where eggs are tucked for incubation after being laid.


...I think I made myself a little sick just now. 

[Anglerfish610]

My one complaint is that I'd expect the head fringe to be a little more low-key, based on the idea that the male half of a species tends to have the "look at me, look at me" features. (Mane on a lion, tail on a peacock... Hell, I've seen some men that have better, more luxurious hair than any woman may hope to have)

[SharpEdgeSoda]

Thats probably the best possible rendering I've seen so far.

[planguy]

Fish Fables wrote...

My one complaint is that I'd expect the head fringe to be a little more low-key, based on the idea that the male half of a species tends to have the "look at me, look at me" features. (Mane on a lion, tail on a peacock... Hell, I've seen some men that have better, more luxurious hair than any woman may hope to have)

This is a good point. Maybe turian females will also be duller in color then their male counterparts?

[Pannamaslo]

Roninraver wrote...

Quarians evolved from something that one can only assume was a mammalian species.  Turians we know for a fact are not mammals.

We do? I am curious, becouse codex entry does not state anything about Turian evolution except metallic thingy. But I could missed something.

[Riot Inducer]

planguy wrote...
This is a good point. Maybe turian females will also be duller in color then their male counterparts?

I'm having a hard time imagining a color duller than the green-gray the turians already are

[Culwch]

Roninraver wrote...

Culwch wrote...

Quarians, who seem to share at least some of their physiology with Turians, do have breasts. If Turians are mammal analogues, it would more or less make sense for females to be built like that.

I would expect Salarian females to be flat-chested, though.

The structure of their DNA is similar, based upon the same amino acid chains.  That does not mean that they should share morphological traits and display sexual dimorphism in the same way.

I believe that their skeletons are similar - compare Tali's and Garrus's hips, feet and hands.

Of course, this could be simple coincidence and they may be nothing like each other.

[SharpEdgeSoda]

We still don't know what a naked Turian looks like...we can't even guess thanks to the trash cans they all wear.

[dreman9999]

Llandaryn wrote...

ohupthis wrote...

Hold on there Skippy, birds don't have boobs!

That we know of.

I mean, we've only seen earth-birds. Nobody has seen space-birds. And the platypus is a good example of a monotreme that has characteristics of both birds and mammals.

Mammary glands are excusive to mammal, it's were we get the word "mammal" from. That and based on the evolution of birds, any thing that can way a bird down in flight has been thrown out like certin extended sexual organs for males, duel deposits for waste and mamary glands. Though land based only male bird do have extended male organs, the females still lay eggs and if turians are an extention of birds and reptiles then their not going to have boobs.

[Litos456]

It does seem realistic.

[tmp7704]

Fish Fables wrote...

My one complaint is that I'd expect the head fringe to be a little more low-key, based on the idea that the male half of a species tends to have the "look at me, look at me" features. (Mane on a lion, tail on a peacock... Hell, I've seen some men that have better, more luxurious hair than any woman may hope to have)

That  type of sexual dimporphism makes sense but on the other hand it's result of specific evolution which had the males of a species compete for attention of the females. It's not universal and in some species the reverse can happen -- lot of spiders for example or even mammals like hyenas can have the female larger and otherwise more attention catching than the male.

Modifié par tmp7704, 12 février 2010 - 08:17 .

[dreman9999]

Fish Fables wrote...

My one complaint is that I'd expect the head fringe to be a little more low-key, based on the idea that the male half of a species tends to have the "look at me, look at me" features. (Mane on a lion, tail on a peacock... Hell, I've seen some men that have better, more luxurious hair than any woman may hope to have)

and breads, too.

[Pannamaslo]

dreman9999 wrote...

Llandaryn wrote...

ohupthis wrote...

Hold on there Skippy, birds don't have boobs!

That we know of.

I mean, we've only seen earth-birds. Nobody has seen space-birds. And the platypus is a good example of a monotreme that has characteristics of both birds and mammals.

Mammary glands are excusive to mammal, it's were we get the word "mammal" from. That and based on the evolution of birds, any thing that can way a bird down in flight has been thrown out like certin extended sexual organs for males, duel deposits for waste and mamary glands. Though land based only male bird do have extended male organs, the females still lay eggs and if turians are an extention of birds and reptiles then their not going to have boobs.

Who knows what they are...I mean I think even devs don't know at this point IMO.

[SharpEdgeSoda]

http://masseffect.wi...thout_armor.jpg

Wait, I just found this picture.

Uhh...He doesn't seem to have...anything...

Modifié par SharpEdgeSoda, 12 février 2010 - 08:18 .

[dreman9999]

Arrtis wrote...

ohupthis wrote...

Hold on there Skippy, birds don't have boobs!

But they are gonna turn it into a romance option we gotta have something.

You want to do what with it. They have hard skin. You can get away with having one insert it in you, but putting "it' in them would.....hurt.

[Soldier989]

SharpEdgeSoda wrote...

http://masseffect.wi...thout_armor.jpg

Wait, I just found this picture.

Uhh...He doesn't seem to have...anything...

Do you think they would have drawn everything on publicly released concept art?

[dreman9999]

SharpEdgeSoda wrote...

http://masseffect.wi...thout_armor.jpg

Wait, I just found this picture.

Uhh...He doesn't seem to have...anything...

Large land based bird and lizard store their  "thing" inside untill the deed needs to be done.
Note:Reptils have two and land birds thing is quetionalbly long, espesally ducks.

[Tranter88]

SharpEdgeSoda wrote...

http://masseffect.wi...thout_armor.jpg

Wait, I just found this picture.

Uhh...He doesn't seem to have...anything...

Well that explains why Garrus was bumping heads...he wasn't going to be bumping anything else

[dreman9999]

Pannamaslo wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

Llandaryn wrote...

ohupthis wrote...

Hold on there Skippy, birds don't have boobs!

That we know of.

I mean, we've only seen earth-birds. Nobody has seen space-birds. And the platypus is a good example of a monotreme that has characteristics of both birds and mammals.

Mammary glands are excusive to mammal, it's were we get the word "mammal" from. That and based on the evolution of birds, any thing that can way a bird down in flight has been thrown out like certin extended sexual organs for males, duel deposits for waste and mamary glands. Though land based only male bird do have extended male organs, the females still lay eggs and if turians are an extention of birds and reptiles then their not going to have boobs.

Who knows what they are...I mean I think even devs don't know at this point IMO.

Their already comfermed to be Ave.