93 réponses à ce sujet

[tmelange]

Dzikv wrote...

Yup i realize what this forum is and i post it here to share. I know most people will think its TL and won't read... But still. And it has massive spoilers in it so i couldn't post it in the main forum either.

P.S i don't remeber how those cannons were called... Thorax was the first thing that poped in my head tho ^^

It started with a T i am sure of that.

I read the whole thing. I pretty much agree with everything. I commend you for taking the time to compose and post, though it probably would have been more impactful if you had edited first.

Didn't ME1 have a review thread where everyone who wanted to review the game could post their opinions, likes and dislikes in a consolidated fashion? They should have done the same for ME2.

[banshee768]

I agree with everything being said. This game is NOT up to BioWare's standards. Not by a long shot. But I still enjoy it. In my mind it's an EA game. That way I'm not disappointed.
EDIT: Mr. Maviarab's post made no sense at all. Consumers are not allowed to criticize the products they buy? In what galaxy?

Modifié par banshee768, 13 février 2010 - 06:30 .

[Macktruck305]

shaneho78 wrote...

Confirmation bias. Obviously prefers ME1. Seeking reasons to justify beliefs. Unacceptable.

I just want to say that this is by far the funniest thing I've ever read on these forums...  Couldn't stop laughing

[Kristofer1]

banshee768 wrote...

I agree with everything being said. This game is NOT up to BioWare's standards. Not by a long shot. But I still enjoy it. In my mind it's an EA game. That way I'm not disappointed.
EDIT: Mr. Maviarab's post made no sense at all. Consumers are not allowed to criticize the products they buy? In what galaxy?

good point... perhaps bioware will make the same move bungie made and split before its to late?

[.primus]

ever heard of the email us link at the bottom of bioware pages? let alone the flock of people blaming EA for "supposedly" making the game different.



This has been something that has been said multiple times and that is great because you can't expect ME2 to be the perfect game. But seriously, if it's just another rant and rave about how the first game is the bomb diggity either blog it or shoot and email to BioWare.

[Lord Atlia]

My reaction to TC:

-Story: It is the middle to a trilogy, the peaks and troughs are going to be smaller by design.

-Boss: Bioware does bad bosses in all their games, plain and simple. You want boss fights play MGS, Demon's Souls or WoW.

-LIs: They dropped the ball here, I can see what they were going for, but it was poorly played and now they have 9 LIs for ME3 at least, I am praying that the law of diminishing returns does not kick in.

-Scanning: sucks, but this has been known for awhile.

-Interface: ME1=RPG+Shooter, ME2=Shooter, I believe they did this correctly. Obviously people who hate shooters don't like this but in my opinion it was the right choice.

-Weapons: Each weapon has unique properties, no 2 pistols are the same. ME1 let you customize weapons to an extent but they were all basically the same weapon. I think min/maxers liked ME1 better because you could do stupid things like make a rifle with a near infinite clip.

-Ammo System: Is better in my opinion as it brings scarcity into play. You can't just sit back and use the Widow infinitely.

-Helmets: WTF

-Stats: I don't care about customizing my stats or my squad's stats, ME2 is a game of skill not one of optimization. I don't want to put my squad in Tier X Spectre gear and watch them roll face on insanity.

[Sailears]

LostScout wrote...

I agree with every point that Dzikv made. And I think there are a lot more people who played ME1 and don't think ME2 is an improvement than people realize. The majority of people in life who don't care for something don't bother to post on it in forums, they just quietly go away. Some areas of the combat system were definitely improved, but other parts still need work. Instead of fixing what was wrong with the mako and the inventory system, they removed them, and replaced it with things that are just as flawed. Planetary scanning for resources was a fun nod to the game Starflight, and it can be soothing to listen to the music and click on the rotating orb, but it also gets old once you have done if for awhile. Landing on a planet and scrounging for tech upgrades and resources would be a lot more interesting. The ability to change components on the N7 armor, customize the colors and decide whether you want a helmet or not was a good thing, The total lack of that on the downloadable armo's, not so much. There is tremendous room for improvement in almost everything in ME2, and it wont hurt Bioware at all to have more of these threads, and to pay attention to what is bothering people and why.

Well put, I agree.

Modifié par Curunen, 13 février 2010 - 08:37 .

[harrier25699]

Lord Atlia wrote...

-Ammo System: Is better in my opinion as it brings scarcity into play. You can't just sit back and use the Widow infinitely.
-Helmets: WTF
-Stats: I don't care about customizing my stats or my squad's stats, ME2 is a game of skill not one of optimization. I don't want to put my squad in Tier X Spectre gear and watch them roll face on insanity.

The current ammo system had me staring at my feet during much of the game scrounging for more clips.   I spent far too much time looking at the floor and not at the concept alien environments the level designers and artist put together.  Would you put a TV in front of the Mona Lisa?  ME 1 had an intuitive and original ammo concept that just needed a bit of tweaking with the weapon mods, so you could not fire indefinately with any given weapon.

Stats are a vital part of any RPG.  If ME is no longer an RPG then fine but it hasn't been clarified yet afaik so I won't go further than saying I like stats on my gear.  How do I know what is best for my character without them? You could go on to say that having character levels is a waste of time or ranks of powers, all just stats in the end.

The only way to get Tier X Spectre Armor in ME 1 for your entire squad is to cheat.  Cheating ruins any game imo.

Modifié par harrier25699, 13 février 2010 - 10:46 .

[Kristofer1]

Lord Atlia wrote...

My reaction to TC:
-Story: It is the middle to a trilogy, the peaks and troughs are going to be smaller by design.
-Boss: Bioware does bad bosses in all their games, plain and simple. You want boss fights play MGS, Demon's Souls or WoW.
-LIs: They dropped the ball here, I can see what they were going for, but it was poorly played and now they have 9 LIs for ME3 at least, I am praying that the law of diminishing returns does not kick in.
-Scanning: sucks, but this has been known for awhile.
-Interface: ME1=RPG+Shooter, ME2=Shooter, I believe they did this correctly. Obviously people who hate shooters don't like this but in my opinion it was the right choice.
-Weapons: Each weapon has unique properties, no 2 pistols are the same. ME1 let you customize weapons to an extent but they were all basically the same weapon. I think min/maxers liked ME1 better because you could do stupid things like make a rifle with a near infinite clip.
-Ammo System: Is better in my opinion as it brings scarcity into play. You can't just sit back and use the Widow infinitely.
-Helmets: WTF
-Stats: I don't care about customizing my stats or my squad's stats, ME2 is a game of skill not one of optimization. I don't want to put my squad in Tier X Spectre gear and watch them roll face on insanity.

Precisely the point here. Bioware makes RPG's they are known for RPG's why are they trying to become a shooter? The RPG plus shooter as fresh. Going straight shooter was lame. They run the risk of becoming a medal of honor series... but mass effect style.

[ZennExile]

Dzikv wrote...

(Warning!! Major whining and spoilers ahead.)

Dear Bioware.

I have played your games since BG1 or even earlier. Always a fan as you hardly ever disappointed me. You make either epic games or "ok" ones. I was waiting for ME 2 for a long time because i am a huge fan of the ME universe. I
preordered the collectors edition a month ahead the launch as i did with DA:O. Was expecting at least the amount of fun that Da:o brought me... How surprised i was when now, after 40 hours of playing the game i have with great effort finished it. Why with great effort you ask? Because ME 2 is not a good game by your (Bioware) standards... It's hardly an OK game.

I don't usually write this kind of threads but as a unsatisfied customer (for the first time in my Bioware gaming history i am unsatisfied) i need to compile a list of things to address the issues i have with the game. I doubt it will actually be read and understood as this game seems to be already selling like the cure for cancer...  So i do it for myself and others like me. To at last tell myself i did something to help one of my favorite game worlds, maybe contribute to saving it from being destroyed in ME3...

I am a frequent visitor to these forums as i was to the previous ME forum. I knew that ME2 was getting dumbed down *cough* I'm sorry... I meant "Streamlined" for a while now. I thought that is a shame but i was happy to continue my Shepards story because that is where you mostly shine as a company... Boy  was i surprised there...

Thats where my main problem with the game lies. The main overarching story is so... From a lack of another adequate word i'll say "stupid" that its painful. Its something so grotesque and unbelievable like it came from a bad B rated 60's sci-fi movie or novel.

I am surprised that the trailer didn't say it out loud like this:

"The evil bugs from a forbidden planet "X" invade to steal our women and turn them into goo to build a super space robot! That looks like a human! And has teeth!".... Seriously?

The end boss itself is something that came from "God of War 5000" not a serious sci-fi universe. Huge metal skeleton of a man as an end boss is not something i would expect from Mass effect franchise...What were you thinking?!

But thats only the last nail to the coffin.... You kill off the main hero just to force him into a new team for some reason. Like you couldn't find another believable reason for Shepard to be where he/she is. Then all he/she does the whole game is build up the frigin team just to be interrupted roughly 2-3 times to follow the main story... Its like the main story is a afterthought here... It resembles DA:O in that aspect more then it does ME1 where the story and Shepard are the main heroes... Not a bunch of (some poorly written i must add) whiny companions... It feels like there is no continuity here... Its fragmented and chaotic. The first ME story was straight (not implying linear) and with a strong purpose to it. Here it feels more like Shepard is joking...

And the main story doesn't hold water anyway...It has no twist to it if you don't count the bad half reaper half human hybrid twist at the end ...

The whole universe suddenly doesn't care for anything. You meet your old companions... BAH! Ashley even calls you a "god" but then suddenly spits all over you for being with Cerberus... Thats a hell of an opinion change in such a short time there isn't it?

Then there is Liara... My Shepards LI that fought for 2 years to get her back... And then Liara completely ignores her and the "mission" she is involved in because of some stupid vendetta i can't  even help her with...Or get any actually info on (except from the damn comic... ) Can you be more off character?

But then there are other people you met in ME1 that appear... And 90% of them send you e-mails... C'mon! Seriously?!

There is so much missing... Did you not have enough time to finish this? Did anyone actually think on the story as a whole before doing ME2? Or did you just cater to the younger generation and their short attention spans?

And for some reason i don't think i actually chose anything in the game. Don't get me wrong... There are choices in the game but nothing with actual consequence to it. I'm not only talking story wise but mostly game-play wise. You don't make a choice. Everything is so easy to achieve and get... Its all one click away...

Not all of the game is so bad thought! There are many moments the game shines story wise... Many characters made me giggle,
smile or be surprised at the writing that bioware did for them. Some characters appear in person and they are mostly great. Even the rachni make an appearance which positively surprised me. So it's not all bad... BUT its not an excuse! Not for people who made ME1 and all the other great games in the past.


Now i listened to the interview and trailers. And i was happy to hear of so many changes to the game. Not all of them sounded like improvements to me but a game needs to change to be better right? And as it goes for combat/ gameplay the game is better then ME1 in many aspects... But the rest are just bad ideas. For example:

- Planet scanning.

When i heard you will take the mako out and replace it with this i thought you figured out the mako was too boring to salvage... I was wrong it seems.

After completing the game i cannot think of a more redundant and boring thing to do then scanning planets in ME2...

Its worse then a asian MMO grind fest - and i played Lineage 2...
I was surprised to find that the MAKO was better! At least you got to actually EXPLORE and sometimes even SHOOT stuff. There is nothing to "discover" by scanning planets. If there is an anomaly then EDI tells you there is... The rest is just resources which after 10 or so fully scanned planets i had enough for ALL the updates!

And you can't even sell the resources! You still can buy most of the upgrades if not all with the money you get from all the sad little side  missions but if i can't sell the resources and i won't find anything useful by scanning the planets then why bother with more then the first 10 rich ones?

And someone please tell me why the hell do i have to work for my money? Shepard is a 2 billion credits worth of a project... I bet Cerberus wouldn't mind giving me a million to spend on upgrades... Its one of those things that doesn't hold water story wise in the game... 

So now that planet scanning is even more boring then MAKO (imho) are you going to remove it too...? >.>

There are many ways to make the scanning more interesting or atleast less strain on the wrist. Some kind of minigame... Or just leave the scanning to EDI... Thats what machines are for right?

And don't get me started on the probes... Why the hell are they limited? What s the reason for this? Time sink? Money sink? It makes scanning even more annoying... Same goes for fuel.

Makes me feel like the people designing ME2 didn't play ME1 at all...

- Equipment.

So you got rid of the whole inventory and weapon system in your quest to make the game better by removing stuff. Great job... Can we get the inventory back now?

I'll start with the weapons... Did you forget that the core aspect of a RPG is gear? From the lame "diablo" or "WoW" aspect of EPIXX to the more leveled out aspect of for example "Fallout 3" (named guns that were better then ordinary... Like the Lincolns own personal rifle) or DA:O gear plays a role in a RPG. Its something not only to strive for its
something that gives you an ability to personalize your character.

Its been talked about allot on these forums so i won't go much further then saying the weapon system of ME2 works- For a shooter and only thought half of the game when you have all the weapons and you're just hunting for + 10% upgrades.  Redundant as the scanning part... Its  "Streamlined" alright... Dumbed down to oblivion...

And of course there is no stats on weapons... But there are no stats in the whole game so it doesn't surprise me. Everything is "intuitive" and "streamlined"...

But it works. Its a good shooter i give them that. Ammo didn't bother me as much as i expected it too. Its still a stupid change.  It would make a game allot better if the collectors didn't drop heat sinks... So many awkward things like that which have no lore explanation could be dodged if you just used the system from ME1....

The armor on the other hand is where you dropped the ball hard. Its been written by many before that the "Forced helmet " issue on the special gear is just.... Well its one of the most stupid decisions i have seen in gaming history. You gave the main character a voice and a face to express emotions... You gave us (a small) but still a possibility to customize our looks... You gave us the "terminator look" for renegades. Then you cover it up with a helmet... What? Are you serious? Who is running your company? Blind people? Nuff said...

An the customization of th BASIC armor is a good step... More parts + more looks /colors + more casual clothes would be better...

The research part is redundant tho. Completely pointless waste of time. It would be better if you had to choose with limited resources... for example : Do i choose the sniper upgrade or health one? 
Right now you have enough of resources to plate an entire ship 100X in the game... Pointless. There is no choice. Just a time sink.

To sum it up. Wearing the epic most advanced armor (Or some legendary heroes armor in a fantasy RPG) gives one a feeling of
power and advancement. Achievement really.In a way it ties you to some places facts and people (Like Zeads rifle for example which he brags about.) Why did you feel thats not needed in ME2 is beyond me...

- Ship upgrades

Ohh yes... Sounded so good on paper.  Again with the unlimited resources its just a one click thing... Doesn't make you feel you achieved something at all. You don't have to choose between one upgrade or another... There is no choice because there is unlimited resources.

It's a waste of a good opportunity for a few good missions. A infiltration mission into the turian military base for the Thorax cannons... Diplomacy talks with the asari for the plating or some kind of proving of your intentions or worth... Or just a simple "Do something or us and we give you the plans for the plating" quest type.
Nahh... Lets just not do that and just give us a 1 click option for all upgrades... Its to complicated do actually do a quest for it...right? WRONG! It would give this game SOOO much more feeling ,illusions of realism and... Choice...

You did it wrong.

An then the whole upgrade is just for the end mission CINEMATIC! What? I thought that upgrading your ship would have more impact then a Cinematic battle... Another opportunity wasted. 

What about meeting pirates in the PIRATE FILLED terminus systems? Or batarians hunting for Shepard having grudges from the war? Makes the universe feel more alive you know... Like in ME1 there was this guy who wanted to nuke Shepard for some Alliance related reason. Shepard made allot of enemies... Please use them next time and don't bring in the huge half human 3 eyed metal skeletons into the universe... Please?

- Enemies

Alright... So we have robots... everywhere.... Why? The official explanation is the death toll on the citadel and lack of security force to fill up the gap. So... Why are they in the terminus systems? Or better yet why are they on the planet where 10 years ago Jacobs father crashed if they were introduced 2 years ago? Doesn't make any sense. 

And why would anyone use machines as defense after the presumed geth "invasion" on the citadel? The sane and logical answer is none would use them because of the amount of hate and mistrust to anything mechanical and walking the recent geth war cosed.

But no... You put in a model for limb loss. And you needed to show it off on something that doesn't bleed... As you downgraded the age rating for the game to kick up the sales. Who cares if it makes no sense in the game lore at all...

Who cares if i shoot a bullet from  my anti-material sniper rifle (widow) at someones head and it stays in place... And remains whole... No... Only machines loose their limbs...

And the whole barrier/armor/health paper/ rock/ scissors thing is absurd... Why does armor work like the shield anyway?! Why do i have to strip down the armor of an enemy completely before killing them? Why not just leave it as it was in ME1?! Its beyond me..

- Skills.

You call this game an RPG. But in the skill department even Bioshock was better.

You cut down the amount of skills and said you introduced a evolution system to them to make them unique and varied.... Thats what was said before the launch.

Now when i had the "pleasure" of seeing it in action i can say its really... really bad. The evolution of skill as you call it is either 1. make the skill stronger on one enemy or 2. make it work on many enemies at once.... Seriously that is your system? Thats the whole evolution you bragged about? This is a joke.

You removed weapon skills and i applaud to that. Shepard is a skilled soldier and doesn't need to learn how to shoot. But following this logic why are there ammo skills?

You also removed the technicians skills like dampening and electronics and give for example for the infiltrator a skill called "incarnate"... Whats incarnate suppose to be?! Some kind of spell they cast? Why is it unlimited? And most of all why the hell would an infiltrator have such a skill in the first place?! Why not leave it the way it was... Dampening and electronics had a point for a infiltrator.... A logical use in game lore and in game play itself... Now you put in "spells" like from a fantasy game? C'mon Bioware!

Wake up!

Same with hacking... Why ohh why did you make everyone able to hack? Having engineers be the only ones with the ability gave the first game a bit of tactical team choice depth... How little it was it was there... and you removed it.

Now if i don't play on insanity i can take whoever i want on a mission. Thats only because for some reason biotic don't work on shielded enemies....

So to sum it up. The whole skill system doesn't leave much to experiment in a second playthrough... Especially when you can reach the MAXIMUM LEVEL ON THE FIRST TRY! Every setup is a cookie cutter setup (at least for an infiltrator... but i bet its the same with soldier and other classes) Wheres my reasons to play NG+? To follow the same absurd and grotesque linear story? To "explore"? You can get most of the achievements on the first playthrough too... 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ok i'm going to finish this. Its a rant i know... Its incoherent in many places and might make little sense to anyone but me and some of my friends that are also disappointed in this game.
I just want to say that this is no a BAD game. Its playable. In many aspects its better then ME1... But Bioware should do better. To leave so many gaps, to make so may pointless changes an to push such a grotesque and plain silly story into the mass effect franchise with a straight face... Thats more of EA then Bioware i know in there...

There is so much great new stuff. The dialog braking, Legion, insight on the Quarians, Asari and Turians. Amazing dialogs at a few points, a few good quests. the extremely fun combat compared to ME1. These all make ME2 a ok game...


It could be Epic though... To bad it isn't...

I agree with you and there are hundreds of thousands more who support your ideas here.  Don't let the fanboi bull**** trolling affect you.  They know Bioware dropped the ball on ME2 too.  They just can't admit it because that would mean their lord and savior Bioware, was wrong.  And that would unmake the universe.

The game wasn't finished.  It's obvious it wasn't finished, It even "feels" like it wasn't finished and I have no feelings.  Many of the missions have massive plots of terrain that are just cut off because they were "streamlined" which in real person words means, "we didn't have time to finish and the boss is pissed about the quarterly earnings so we have to cut costs."  They removed everything anyone complained about from the first ME1 instead of making those mechanics more functional.

Mass Effect is what it is because the first game was "**** ING EPIC".  To destroy that success so utterly as Bioware has with ME2 is just... unbelievable.  They made a "new" game instead of a sequel.  It appeals to the original audience with story elements only.  Everything else is designed as a cash grab ADD gamer scam.  You spent 40 hours on your playthrough.  That is impressive to me.  I wish there was 40 hours worth of gameplay though.  I just ran a perfect 100% complete game on Insanity in less than 30 hours total.

30 hours for 100% complete in a mainstream RPG sequel to a HUGELY successful RPG that had nearly 80 hours of actual gameplay elements, is without a doubt the most offensive thing Bioware could have done to the fans who made the Mass Effect Universe such a success.

But you are right about the quality of the game.  Bioware made even watered down garbage into an OK game.  But it was far from Epic.  The worst part is they are already ruining ME3 by doing exactly the same thing because EA has convinced them to make lackluster garbage in high vollume supported by marketing instead of great games like they used to.

[harrier25699]

An epic RPG (not mentioning names here) usually takes me about 60+ hours to complete. And I don't have to spend hours mining, though I did breed a large number of chocobo's.

[aeetos21]

Very well thought out, I don't agree with everything you said - Dzikv - but I do agree with some, just not to the degree you emphasized. In terms of plot I think BW really had its hands tied with this being a sequel and bridge between ME1 and ME3, couldn't do anything extremely outlandish. I'm looking at ME2 more as a leadin to ME3 more than a stand alone game.



Main plot? Definitely could've been better but then that's what these comments are for. To let BW know what we liked and didn't like so that the next game can be even better. Well thought out, good explanations, I don't agree with everything but there's definitely some merit to a lot of what you said.

[Shadowfire67]

Blah blah I don't have my equipment or items or skills like ME1 anymore blah blah....

[Nozybidaj]

Agree with a lot of the OP points but:

Then there is Liara... My Shepards LI that fought for 2 years to
get her back... And then Liara completely ignores her and the "mission"
she is involved in because of some stupid vendetta i can't  even help
her with...Or get any actually info on (except from the damn comic... )
Can you be more off character?

Please don't challenge them to be even "more off character" they'll probably do it.

Yes the handling of the LI's was extremely poor.  Writing them out of the story is easily the biggest black mark on the game in my eyes.  It totally removed any emotional attachment I had to anything to do with ME2.

[Faust1979]

I thought part of the point of the storyline was they were trying to capture the feeling of playing through an 80s action sci fi film, it's over the top in parts, the main character is a bad ass. Tough marines and everything. It seems like the greatest sci fi 80s action film and you get to play it!

[TheShady]

Maviarab wrote...

You vote for who you think might do a good job...you notice you never get to vote on something that really really matters?

Nuff said....

What if I live in Switzerland?

Dislike tomatoes all you want....liking them and knowing how to grow them ate seperate issues...

Nuff said....

I can still tell the farmer his tomatos suck because I can compare his tomatos with the tomatos of other farmers.

Criticise a movie by all means, but its based on your opinions and likes/dislikes and not facts.

Nuff said....

Exactly.


The point I was trying to make is this: I don't have to be a professional to have an opinion or to criticise something. I'm just sick of the "you can't say something's bad if you can't do it better yourself" argument. That defeats the purpose of criticism.

So, we don't have to be able to create games ourselves to tell Bioware that we think ME2 was not as good as their other games.

[KPnuts123]

OP I respect your opinion on the game and even though I love ME2 I do agree with you on some points that you made. Especially the Final boss. I just thought it was going to say "I'll be back" at one stage.

On the inventory thing I like the new system but that's not to say I wouldn't like it to be a different way of doing things. Maybe as one poster has said already said they could have used a similar system to Final Fantasy with an Item screen etc.

That being said the Mako and Inventory system were taken out totally due to the fact that both the community and also the reviewers were extremely vocal about their dislilke for both things. Personally I'd have like a vehicle to come with the gam einstead of having to wait for the Hammerhead to come as DLC.

Apart from that I think that Bioware have done a good job with the game especially tightening up the combat which was awful in the first game really. The plot for the game is still there but TBH ME2 isn't plot driven it's character driven more than anything and in this respect it does it's job really well. All the characters that you recruit for you team grow as you go through the game from Garrus through Jack and to an extent although he's a late edition to the team Legion' scharacter grows.

So all in all I do respect your opinion and your right to voice/type it and I do agree with you on points but on the others I'm going to have to respectfully disagree with you.

Modifié par KPnuts123, 14 février 2010 - 03:17 .

[Jarcander]

Holy walls of text.



From what I understood, you are upset about something. Oh well, they can't all be winners. Most would consider ME2 a success, but there is always someone... good points by the way. I agree that Liara is insensitive blue biatca in ME2, but then I realized I just thought so because I missed her. What a wonderful character.

[P-012]

I agree with the OP in most aspects stated, except the final boss didnt bug me all that much.

[DaddyFoxDerek]

GnusmasTHX wrote...

Maj.Pain007 wrote...

Cliffs?

seriously not reading that novel.

OP finds the One Ring and is told by a Wizard to drop in a volcano thousands of miles away.

Lol.... that's freaking hilarious!

.........................

By the way, I couldn't disagree more with the OP. Mass Effect 2 was the best game I've ever had the pleasure of playing- I've played through it several times and still can't put it down.

[GnusmasTHX]

Only service guarantees citizenship, only the citizen can vote.



Lawl, watched Star Ship Troopers.

[MrVincent]

I cannot form an opinion on your post because I did not have time to read the trilogy that you wrote.



Thank you.

[smudboy]

OP is a biotic god. And like most biotic gods, are too trippy to press buttons in a way English humans can read.



Needs a powerful Asari Commando to put on some tights and teach this 12 year old how to type.



Other than the permanent damage done to the Wernicke's area of my brain: yes. It's like a 12 year old wrote this (ME2 main story) sh*t.

[GnusmasTHX]

MrVincent wrote...

I cannot form an opinion on your post because I did not have time to read the trilogy that you wrote.

Thank you.

Rofl...

Can we have rights to the screen-play, OP?

Modifié par GnusmasTHX, 14 février 2010 - 04:39 .

[Kolaris8472]

Agreed with most of what the OP wrote. Going in, I was rather expecting to be disappointed in ME2 for almost a dozen reasons.



But, for every step back in terms of scope, gameplay (opinion) and in-depth RPG customization, they threw another well-written and interesting squadmate at me and an incredibly diverse set of loyalty missions.