Wishpig wrote...
Fexelea wrote...
Wishpig wrote...
AngryFrozenWater wrote...
The argument that one cannot know how good a product is before release is getting old.
And yet it remains true.
This is not true. There have been and there will continue to be plenty of products that even the most uninformed can tell will fail and can classify as stupid/bad/lol from the first preview. An example.
Thanks for proving my point... that product may be laughible to some, but it isn't to people who need it, the handicapped and the obese.
See, you just judged a product unfairly and without doing research. You judged to quickly off limited knowledge.
YES, sometimes you can predict something will be bad and be right, BUT you can also judge unfairly and be WRONG. It happens to everyone. If you liked Dragon Age, then writing off awakaning before anyone has laid hands on the sucker is foolish and pig-headed. Wait till something substantial like reviews and feedback before making up your mind.
And I am not speaking about people who have doubts or even threaten not to buy.
I am speaking about 95% of the people who strait out say, "I'm not gonna buy because *insert point*". however, people who actually stick to their claim if the game gets good reviews and feedback are rare...
I have not proven your point in the slightest. Stating something does not make it so.
You assumptions regarding the attractiveness of a product to a certain audience do nothing to further your initial point that assessing a product's worth for ONESELF before "anyone has tried it" is innacurate. Conversely, your reaction could be considered as proving my point, which is: if there is a personal preference factor that affects the purchase decision, there can be no rights or wrongs in arriving at that decision as it is a personal process.
Your further assumptions regarding how I arrived at any opinion and the depths of my research and/or knowledge do not discredit the veracity of my point nor increase the validity of yours.
Your attribution of percentages without any reliable backing do not validate your opinion.
Your insistance in calling people pig-headed for making a decision regarding a purchase based on a personal preference and thought process is hypocritical given you are making an assessment and decision to call such people pig-headed before you know how they arrived at their stance or "laid your hands on them" at all. (hehe)
It would be better if you abstained from stubbornly repeating a flawed argument. It makes you look pig-headed from my stance.





Retour en haut








