Inconsistencies
#1
Posté 13 février 2010 - 04:34
While playing Legion's loyalty mission when first told about rewriting the heretics it is considered paragon to say rewriting is bad but when it comes time to actually make the choice rewriting is considered paragon.
#2
Posté 13 février 2010 - 04:35
let them focus on IMPORTANT things, not minor annoyances which are results of the alternative being loads of work for something small and insignificant.
#3
Posté 13 février 2010 - 04:37
#4
Posté 13 février 2010 - 04:37
#5
Posté 13 février 2010 - 04:37
If you want a real inconsistency how about the fact that Legion says you talked to Sovreign on Ilos.
#6
Posté 13 février 2010 - 04:38
#7
Posté 13 février 2010 - 05:28
Modifié par spin156, 13 février 2010 - 05:31 .
#8
Posté 13 février 2010 - 05:30
#9
Posté 13 février 2010 - 05:32
spin156 wrote...
How about the one where Ashley (or Kaiden, if you're playing femShep) get stung by the swarm on Horizon, but magically appear at the end of the mission (at the same time as the 2nd appearance of whiny/coward guy)? WTFO???? That one has really got me puzzled.
Yeah, it's funny how none of the characters even asks how the heck this happened ^^
#10
Posté 14 février 2010 - 04:53
Legion wasn't with you. He wouldn't have first hand knowledge, and all he has to rely on is news reports which would have sketchy information considering Council is playing coverup on the whole Reaper situation.If you want a real inconsistency how about the fact that Legion says you talked to Sovreign on Ilos.
Why would they ask? TheySimonTheFrog wrote...
spin156 wrote...
How
about the one where Ashley (or Kaiden, if you're playing femShep) get
stung by the swarm on Horizon, but magically appear at the end of the
mission (at the same time as the 2nd appearance of whiny/coward guy)?
WTFO???? That one has really got me puzzled.
Yeah, it's funny how none of the characters even asks how the heck this happened ^^
know she was frozen but she obviously wasn't taken aboard the ship and
thus would have no reason to question why she was there and it is
plainly obvious that she thawed out. It is NOT an inconsistancy.
#11
Posté 14 février 2010 - 04:56
#12
Posté 14 février 2010 - 05:41
#13
Posté 14 février 2010 - 05:45
#14
Posté 14 février 2010 - 05:49
You learn more about the geth, and determin its not actully ethicly bad to rewrite them as the mission progresses, yes what shepard thinks is write and wrong can change. Not an inconsistancy.Virginian wrote...
Neither Jacob nor Miranda can use the Assualt Rifles but in cut scenes at the Collector Base I saw both of them using Assualt Rifles.
While playing Legion's loyalty mission when first told about rewriting the heretics it is considered paragon to say rewriting is bad but when it comes time to actually make the choice rewriting is considered paragon.
#15
Posté 14 février 2010 - 05:52
#16
Posté 14 février 2010 - 05:54
#17
Posté 14 février 2010 - 05:56
How about the one where Ashley (or Kaiden, if you're playing femShep) get stung by the swarm on Horizon, but magically appear at the end of the mission (at the same time as the 2nd appearance of whiny/coward guy)? WTFO???? That one has really got me puzzled.
Why? The paralysis was obviously temporary. If you read the mission data, you see that only about the third of the colonists were abducted; Ashley/Kaidan was lucky.
You learn more about the geth, and determin its not actully ethicly bad to rewrite them as the mission progresses, yes what shepard thinks is write and wrong can change. Not an inconsistancy.
It's ethically quite questionable, but no less questionable than blowing them to smithereens. You have to do something or soon all the geth will unite against the organics, so you pick the lesser of two evils as a Paragon.
#18
Posté 14 février 2010 - 06:00
#19
Posté 14 février 2010 - 06:22
xSolclaim wrote...
2 more geth favour rewrite, so doing what the geth want is paragon, but seriously. they still are machines, ever being sentiant, its not like brainwashing people as they were brainwashed to think like that. its more like unbrainwashing people
You are correct





Retour en haut






