89 réponses à ce sujet

[Vash3283]

I would prefer a storyline coop game over an MMORPG as a spin off, personally. (Bioware is making a space MMO already)

[zabuza318]

I still don't think my idea was all that bad ¬_¬

*someone posted a link to an old topic i posted about the idea of co-op*

[xDarkicex]

Please God NO I straight up wouldn't buy it end of story

[Tazzmission]

hell no! i swear to god if people actually want co-op in me thasn im gona smack the ****** out of each and everyone of them asking for it! co op isnt meant for this game at all and get over it.

[xDarkicex]

Tazzmission wrote...

hell no! i swear to god if people actually want co-op in me thasn im gona smack the ****** out of each and everyone of them asking for it! co op isnt meant for this game at all and get over it.

+1 Rep 

[Mavkiel]

Really bad idea adding co-op. Much rather the time/effort/resources put into the single player game.

[GothamLord]

"In fiscal 2011, every one of EA's releases will have an online
component, both downloadable content and online play."



In fiscal 2011 everygame will have an online component. NOT everygame in fiscal 2011 and from that point onward. Just that every game in that fiscal period will have it.  I dont see Mass Effect 3 on shelves until 2012. So until something says this applies to fiscal 2012 or to Mass Effect 3 directly I am not going to worry about the series losing its current single player status.  

[Murmillos]

Wait for mass effect 4 (go sig!)

[thegreateski]

Sure.

How bout multiplayer too?

Lets throw in a rank system and chainsaw guns while we're at it.

[Noobius_Maximo]

Chicken coop for Legion FTW.

[Kirabi]

To people saying no,Why would co-op effect your experience?You can still play the game as single player game.I fail to see how co-op would harm mass effect.You guys don't want do it have to use it when it is put in game.If it would affect your single player game player i could understand but nothing would change.



I am huge fan co-op multiplayer but if it would slow the down the production of ME3 i would not want to be added but if they could add something like what dante inferno is doing or some multiplayer maps



http://video.destructoid.com/#134087



and it does not effect ME3 production and what is big deal.Mass effect has lot of great elements that would make a great co op game and great multiplayer.If we where talking about ME1 you guys might have a argument but ME2 is as much TPS shooter as it is RPG in fact i have seen enough argument on this board that bioware took almost all of RPG out of ME.Good TPS have multiplayer and co op.

[Tazzmission]

Kirabi wrote...

To people saying no,Why would co-op effect your experience?You can still play the game as single player game.I fail to see how co-op would harm mass effect.You guys don't want do it have to use it when it is put in game.If it would affect your single player game player i could understand but nothing would change.

I am huge fan co-op multiplayer but if it would slow the down the production of ME3 i would not want to be added but if they could add something like what dante inferno is doing or some multiplayer maps

http://video.destructoid.com/#134087

and it does not effect ME3 production and what is big deal.Mass effect has lot of great elements that would make a great co op game and great multiplayer.If we where talking about ME1 you guys might have a argument but ME2 is as much TPS shooter as it is RPG in fact i have seen enough argument on this board that bioware took almost all of RPG out of ME.Good TPS have multiplayer and co op.





the reason why i dont want co op is because not every f'n game needs it. it has nothing to do with effecting the production but every game so far ( shooter wise) has a 10 hour campaighn do to either co-op or multiplayer modes. and id rather have a long story thats 30 - 50 hours instead of ten

[Mimaiselphenai]

I'd actually enjoy some form of co-op in the ME series, and that's coming from someone who favors story driven single player games. ME2 would have been great fun co-op, though it'd depend on who you're playing with. If it was someone impatient, you wouldn't really have time to enjoy the story. Some sort of side mission deal would work.

That's assuming multiplayer implementation wasn't at the cost of single player plot content. of course.

Modifié par Mimaiselphenai, 19 mars 2010 - 02:06 .

[ManBearPig91]

Why not let a friend jump in and control a squaddie, similar to controlling tails in Sonic 3? In no way does it take away from any of the single player aspects, but it allows for friends to get invovled (and some fun team play on insanity).

[xDarkicex]

Kirabi wrote...

To people saying no,Why would co-op effect your experience?You can still play the game as single player game.I fail to see how co-op would harm mass effect.You guys don't want do it have to use it when it is put in game.If it would affect your single player game player i could understand but nothing would change.

I am huge fan co-op multiplayer but if it would slow the down the production of ME3 i would not want to be added but if they could add something like what dante inferno is doing or some multiplayer maps

http://video.destructoid.com/#134087

and it does not effect ME3 production and what is big deal.Mass effect has lot of great elements that would make a great co op game and great multiplayer.If we where talking about ME1 you guys might have a argument but ME2 is as much TPS shooter as it is RPG in fact i have seen enough argument on this board that bioware took almost all of RPG out of ME.Good TPS have multiplayer and co op.

Your a Fool, tazz slap him:devil:
creating co-op ruins stories would limit ME3s even more because of console limitations.
you have no Idea how game development work do you? 

Modifié par xDarkicex, 19 mars 2010 - 02:14 .

[Commander Shepard]

NO NO NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[mispelinsuks]

I could see Mass Effect going mmo in the future. Although I would rather have it stay single player. But I am going to have to play star wars the old republic...even if they made the third an mmo.

[Mimaiselphenai]

Single player comes first. If they can nail that down, then I'm all for working co-op around it in some fashion.

[Drakron]

Tazzmission wrote...
the reason why i dont want co op is because not every f'n game needs it. it has nothing to do with effecting the production but every game so far ( shooter wise) has a 10 hour campaighn do to either co-op or multiplayer modes. and id rather have a long story thats 30 - 50 hours instead of ten

Not to mention nobody seems to actually PLAY multiplayer mode, they wanted but actually use it?about 3 month in and multiplayer lobbies are ghost towns ...

That is why developers should just ignore the crybabies that keep asking for a mode that is not going to be used but yet will consume resources that would be better spend on the singleplayer.

[Tazzmission]

Drakron wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...
the reason why i dont want co op is because not every f'n game needs it. it has nothing to do with effecting the production but every game so far ( shooter wise) has a 10 hour campaighn do to either co-op or multiplayer modes. and id rather have a long story thats 30 - 50 hours instead of ten

Not to mention nobody seems to actually PLAY multiplayer mode, they wanted but actually use it?about 3 month in and multiplayer lobbies are ghost towns ...

That is why developers should just ignore the crybabies that keep asking for a mode that is not going to be used but yet will consume resources that would be better spend on the singleplayer.

ty im glaD YOU AGREE. im one of the biggest gta fans and honestly the multi player was terrible for that game as was the co op in saN ANDREAS. with 95% of the board ****ing like woman on there periods about the game  me3 better not suck because if it does im gona smack the ****** out of those 95% of people for making it that way

[Cross1280]

While I am not going to argue for or against this idea, i would just like to point out that Bioware has never done a game with multiplayer or co-op, so it would be something new, well we saw what happened to the RPG elements of ME2 when the focused mainly on the combat element, the Story and RPG suffered, now if they tried to add Co-op/multiplayer, the main game would suffer even more as there entire focus would be towards that and not where the game should truely stay, a single player, story driven game.

Modifié par Cross1280, 19 mars 2010 - 02:37 .

[Mimaiselphenai]

Cross1280 wrote...

While I am not going to argue for or against this idea, i would just like to point out that Bioware has never done a game with multiplayer or co-op, so it would be something new, well we saw what happened to the RPG elements of ME2 when the focused mainly on the combat element, the Story and RPG suffered, now if they tried to add Co-op/multiplayer, the main game would suffer even more as there entire focus would be towards that and not where the game should truely stay, a single player, story driven game.

Baldur's Gate.

[dextertheninja]

Kirabi wrote...

To people saying no,Why would co-op effect your experience?You can still play the game as single player game.I fail to see how co-op would harm mass effect.You guys don't want do it have to use it when it is put in game.If it would affect your single player game player i could understand but nothing would change.

I am huge fan co-op multiplayer but if it would slow the down the production of ME3 i would not want to be added but if they could add something like what dante inferno is doing or some multiplayer maps

http://video.destructoid.com/#134087

and it does not effect ME3 production and what is big deal.Mass effect has lot of great elements that would make a great co op game and great multiplayer.If we where talking about ME1 you guys might have a argument but ME2 is as much TPS shooter as it is RPG in fact i have seen enough argument on this board that bioware took almost all of RPG out of ME.Good TPS have multiplayer and co op.

I totally agree, and ME3 should not go the way of Bioshock 2 and add bad multiplayer to an otherwise great game. They should only add multiplayer and co op if it is amazing like the single player, and if it takes away from the experience by just being an annoying option on the menu, Bioware should leave it out.

[Cross1280]

I do not remember BG having a co-op /multi-player mode, so i will take your word on that, I still feel that with the current team, and how bad the RPG elements suffered with there focus on revamping the combat, that to add the co-op type game play would dilute the game even further into a CoD/Bioshock2/GoW clone as that would be their entire focus.

[Mimaiselphenai]

Cross1280 wrote...

I do not remember BG having a co-op /multi-player mode, so i will take your word on that, I still feel that with the current team, and how bad the RPG elements suffered with there focus on revamping the combat, that to add the co-op type game play would dilute the game even further into a CoD/Bioshock2/GoW clone as that would be their entire focus.

It had co-op, but not many seem to speak of it. People still play it occasionally over hamachi/tunngle. It turned out pretty well, I think. If the single player aspect of ME3 is hammered out BEFORE co-op, then I imagine it'd be a nice addition. Assuming Bioware was willing to spend the resources on it without making it the main focus of the game. Peer-to-peer connection would make it relatively cheap though, I'd think. Not that I know what I'm talking about or anything.