I'd like for this thread to be a staging ground for any and all theories people have on the future of the Geth Collective and/or Legion "himself" (the unit Shepard communicates directly with in ME2), and the effect they may have on the wider universe they are a part of.
I'll get this thread underway now by listing some things I've personally noticed and some theories I have revolving around them ...
Let me begin by saying that I think Legion is a strongly written and very well-realised character in ME2 - I personally found him to be my favourite companion in the game.
I believe "he" possesses great depth, philosophical intrigue and even stronger potential for further development in ME3. For example, the implications of Shepard's interactions with "him"/them and the decisions taken on the Collective's behalf are HUGE. I think we've barely scratched the surface in that regard.
I also seriously believe that the way Legion refers to the protaganist as "Shepard-commander" (like a title of reverance) infers admiration of some kind, possibly bordering on future worship (like what happened with Sovereign).
It will be very interesting to see if whether this comes to pass, and whether this will occur on a mass scale throughout the Collective as a whole, or whether it will be restricted soley to the specific unit of ME2.
I think it could even possibly lead to the emergence of a culture of individuality in the Geth's evolution.
And what truly fascinates me is whether our decisions in ME2 will effect any and all of this, and how ...
PS (edit) : I just started thinking about something else (another alternative maybe?) ...
I find the use of the term "Heretics" to describe the Sovereign worshipping Geth, an interesting choice of wording aswell - it might subtly infer that the Collective believe not only that the opposing Geth worship a false God, but an incorrect one aswell.
To explain further, let me copy/paste a dictionary definition of the word HERETIC : -
Main Entry: her·e·tic
Pronunciation: \\\\\\\\ˈher-ə-ˌtik, ˈhe-rə-\\\\\\\\
Function: noun
Date: 14th century
1 : a dissenter from established religious dogma
2 : one who dissents from an accepted belief or doctrine
To break it down, the idea I'm throwing out here, is that upon a certain interpretation of their use of such a term, one could theorise that the Geth Collective might have once possessed a dogma or doctrine with its own set of beliefs that were well established, and therefore the "Heretics" were actually a splinter group from this orginal philosophy.
Given the fact that the Collective still actively acknowledge the Quarians as their creators, and therefore, the originators of their programming, perhaps they view them as their "true masters" and this is maybe one of the reasons they seek communion with them once more (?) Could they be their original 'religious' figures?
Modifié par themincer, 14 février 2010 - 06:11 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut







