Playing with dead Warden = BS
#826
Posté 03 mars 2010 - 02:57
Imported = known
New Character = unknown
What other events matter? In 'this' expansion?
#827
Posté 03 mars 2010 - 03:05
Mirthadrond wrote...
Isn't DA:A taking place far away from where DA:O occurred, in which case, nothing other than who is king / queen, and is your warden known, or an unknown, really matter.
Imported = known
New Character = unknown
What other events matter? In 'this' expansion?
It's just up the coastline..from Denerim..its not really that far away. The places we've been to on the overall map are teeny, tiny..in comparison with the whole map.
Amaranthine belonged to the Howes.......Howe was very much involved in the plotting and scheming that went on ..in and around Denerim. A king/queen would rule Ferelden..not just Denerim.
#828
Guest_distinguetraces_*
Posté 03 mars 2010 - 06:51
Guest_distinguetraces_*
Mirthadrond wrote...
Isn't DA:A taking place far away from where DA:O occurred, in which case, nothing other than who is king / queen, and is your warden known, or an unknown, really matter.
What other events matter? In 'this' expansion?
Yes -- who is king or queen is certainly one of the bigger things that matters. It is one of the things that we know will be imported from all saves other than the ultimate sacrifice.
I also think it would would matter to Anders how you resolved the Circle Tower, to Velanna how you resolved the Brecilian Forest, and to Sigrun how you resolved Orzammar -- I don't believe we've heard anything from Bioware about any reactivity on these points, however.
Last, DA:A does not take place "far away" from DA:O's setting -- Arl Howe's land sits pretty much right in between Highever and Denerim.
#829
Posté 03 mars 2010 - 07:06
#830
Guest_distinguetraces_*
Posté 03 mars 2010 - 07:28
Guest_distinguetraces_*
AlanC9 wrote...
I'm a little confused -- it's not like Bio is forcing anyone to use the save if your Warden made TUS. I'm just not going to use that save, and I'm not quite clear why anyone who cares about this sort of thing would want to. What have I missed?
You have missed that the ultimate-sacrifice save can be used through a "hand-waving" resurrection, but cannot be used as the basis of a game in which the warden remains dead, but his choices on questions that affect Awakening -- such as who is ruler of Ferelden -- are reflected in a playthrough of the expansion.
#831
Posté 03 mars 2010 - 07:36
Forgive me for not reading all 34 pages.
Edit: never mind -- didn't know about the Orlesian warden thing. How dumb -- what's the point of doing that option if you're not going to support a dead DA:O Warden?
Modifié par AlanC9, 03 mars 2010 - 08:39 .
#832
Posté 03 mars 2010 - 07:41
AlanC9 wrote...
But then who would I be playing in the expansion? Are people seriously looking for an expansion that is built around two possible PCs with completely different histories?
Forgive me for not reading all 34 pages.
I'm wondering this as well, and asked a similar question in another US-ish thread.
EDIT - Actually, I may understand what they're getting at. Are people saying, they want to be able to use the Orlesian warden, but have the choices you made in your US game still stand? Some sort of reflection where someone is like, "Yeah, you're here because our last Ferelden grey warden sacrificed his/herself".
Is that it?
Modifié par Challseus, 03 mars 2010 - 07:43 .
#833
Posté 03 mars 2010 - 07:46
AlanC9 wrote...
But then who would I be playing in the expansion? Are people seriously looking for an expansion that is built around two possible PCs with completely different histories?
Forgive me for not reading all 34 pages.
The Orlesian, obviously. And no, you misunderstand. What those of us with US wardens want is the same sort of continuity to the gameworld that surviving wardens will get, in regard to who's on the throne at the end of Origins, etc. Bioware seemed to initially state that would be the case, but it seems now that won't be happening.
#834
Guest_distinguetraces_*
Posté 03 mars 2010 - 07:58
Guest_distinguetraces_*
AlanC9 wrote...
But then who would I be playing in the expansion?
The Orlesian warden.
Are people seriously looking for an expansion that is built around two possible PCs with completely different histories?
Yes -- the expansion is already built in just that way.
For those who chose to sacrifice Alistair and make Anora queen, the expansion is built to accommodate this.
For those who chose to sacrifice Loghain and make Alistair king, the expansion is built to accommodate this.
All the possibilities for rulership of Ferelden and other variables are already present in Awakening. It is simply that for those who chose the ultimate sacrifice, there is no way to trigger the right specific set of flags.
Modifié par distinguetraces, 03 mars 2010 - 08:07 .
#835
Posté 03 mars 2010 - 08:12
Here is Amarathine:
http://images2.wikia...Amaranthine.PNG
Here is Ferelden:
http://images2.wikia...Map_-_World.jpg
and here is Thedas:
http://images1.wikia...0/ThedasMap.jpg
It would appear that Amarathine is near Denerim.
#836
Posté 03 mars 2010 - 08:54
#837
Posté 04 mars 2010 - 12:40
I have a playthrough where I used TUS too. It is a bummer that this ending doesn't make sense, but hey, the game hasn't been out yet so we don't know what exactly will happen...
...come to think of it my Andraste's ashes theory sounds plausible the more I think about it. It's the Lazarus Project of DA:A hehehe.
#838
Posté 04 mars 2010 - 01:21
#839
Posté 04 mars 2010 - 01:29
SurelyForth wrote...
Do we know for certain that it's just a "small technical issue" that is preventing the US world choices from being imported into Awakening? It seems like it could be hugely complicated, since the world is already partially "redesigned" to react to an Orlesian Warden, adding in the variables of a previous character's choices would be even more convoluted. That would be akin to acknowledging the decisions you make in any given origin when you are playing another origin in the main game. Considering the glitches in DAO once you get past the Landsmeet, I imagine that they would rather risk fan ire than have a game that is half-functional.
In theory there shouldn't be all that huge of an impact as while it takes place in Ferelden it still is disconnected a bit from the Circle and Orzammar which are ultimately where your most major decisions take place (siding with the werewovles v elves isn't that major because it was only one Dalish tribe). It is more of "who" appears in awakenings I guess and what will happen in future expansions. I mean I don't want one expansion dictating other expansions over the main game.
#840
Posté 04 mars 2010 - 04:34
There are a lot of possibilities. Let's give Bioware a chance. Just because they brought Oghren back doesn't mean that good decisions haven't been made.
#841
Guest_Eli-da-Mage_*
Posté 04 mars 2010 - 04:40
Guest_Eli-da-Mage_*
Why couldn't the centaur talk?
He was a little horse! HA HA HA!!!
*canned laughter*
#842
Posté 04 mars 2010 - 11:35
Any way the game is almost.
#843
Posté 05 mars 2010 - 02:33
#844
Posté 05 mars 2010 - 02:36
*Not compatible with Choice 1.0
#845
Posté 05 mars 2010 - 02:38
#846
Posté 05 mars 2010 - 03:28
But people DID complain about it. The whining is nothing new.
Modifié par Shady314, 05 mars 2010 - 03:30 .
#847
Posté 05 mars 2010 - 04:32
Challseus wrote...
AlanC9 wrote...
But then who would I be playing in the expansion? Are people seriously looking for an expansion that is built around two possible PCs with completely different histories?
Forgive me for not reading all 34 pages.
I'm wondering this as well, and asked a similar question in another US-ish thread.
EDIT - Actually, I may understand what they're getting at. Are people saying, they want to be able to use the Orlesian warden, but have the choices you made in your US game still stand? Some sort of reflection where someone is like, "Yeah, you're here because our last Ferelden grey warden sacrificed his/herself".
Is that it?
Yes exactly..thanks for taking time to understand, there are so many that don't..but they offer up the opinion..either : well just do the hand-waive..OR well just don't play your dead warden then.
Frustrating to attempt to explain to each and every one ..what the real issues are.
I pretty much don't any more, if they can't be bothered to read..well I guess there's nothing I can do to help them with that.
#848
Posté 05 mars 2010 - 05:01
I'm about finished with a US-ending character just to have done it. Perhaps I'll understand the depth of the angst displayed in the last 30+ pages after that but admittedly I'll probably play Awakenings through with the other characters I've got who didn't do the US and then another time as the Orlesian just to see the difference.
I can empathize though. You've got an expectation built up of a particular product, something you want and are excited about and suddenly find that it's not going to meet your expectations. Unfortunate, I wish there was a solution for you.
#849
Posté 05 mars 2010 - 08:44
Shady314 wrote...
Or flat out telling you that you that you ended up traveling with Imoen, Jaheira, Minsc, Dynaheir and Khalid.
But people DID complain about it. The whining is nothing new.
My bad, i was just giving them the benefit of the doubt . Probably didnt stop them from doing 20 straight playthroughs of the game either
#850
Posté 05 mars 2010 - 04:46
Feraele wrote...
Challseus wrote...
AlanC9 wrote...
But then who would I be playing in the expansion? Are people seriously looking for an expansion that is built around two possible PCs with completely different histories?
Forgive me for not reading all 34 pages.
I'm wondering this as well, and asked a similar question in another US-ish thread.
EDIT - Actually, I may understand what they're getting at. Are people saying, they want to be able to use the Orlesian warden, but have the choices you made in your US game still stand? Some sort of reflection where someone is like, "Yeah, you're here because our last Ferelden grey warden sacrificed his/herself".
Is that it?
Yes exactly..thanks for taking time to understand, there are so many that don't..but they offer up the opinion..either : well just do the hand-waive..OR well just don't play your dead warden then.
Frustrating to attempt to explain to each and every one ..what the real issues are.
I pretty much don't any more, if they can't be bothered to read..well I guess there's nothing I can do to help them with that.
Yes, I find the argument disturbingly similiar to those who troll the self-help tech forums. You know the "since their game works perfectly, the problems with yours is probably a reflection of your deep moral inadequecy" kinda people.





Retour en haut





