JPfanner wrote...
I suppose a better way to say it would be that all of the imported relationships are handled so poorly and so shallowly with no chance for interaction and dialog that any perceptions of "cheating" and "fidelity" are left ENTIRELY to the imagination of the player. Really, I feel that you have to put more effort into delusional self-denial to maintain the relationships based on the current content. And I'm certainly guilty of that so I'm not trying to throw stones at anyone.
So I feel that the way they were handled with no chance at interaction, that penalizing people for playing the game they COULD play is just absurd. On the other hand, I can't help but be a bit selfish and feel that in ME 3 players who were stubborn enough to hang in there should get something back, something that they most certainly did not get at all in ME 2.
I fully agree here, those who chose to "fill in the blanks" (can't think of a better way of saying it, I mean that as postively as possible), should get their payout. If the ME1 LI are suppose to have some awesome arc to them, then you should get it. I fully agree.
Also, yes, those of us that chose to react directly to what the game gave us should not get hit with a giant stick either. Their own presentation of the material is just as responsible as we are. So I agree with what you said there too, we should not be penalised for it (considering how it was presented to us). As I mentioned a few times, it seems that from the interview transcripts I read from the writers, they are little hung up on cheating and consequences. They do admit that expect a lot of people to jump to a ME2 LI. But their overuse of the word cheat sort of grinds a gear for me.
I guess what I am saying is -they- should also live up to the consequences of their actions too.





Retour en haut






