Lukertin wrote...
For starters, 'If A then B' does not equal 'if not A then not B'. You're eager to assume that it does.
I was responding to the idea that he was tying together the idea of matrimony with a taxonomic category, not constructing a syllogism. I admit I responded hastily and didn't frame my objection well. However, aside from the fact that I didn't pursue the point after he responded, you utterly failed to address the completely accurate criticism that I leveled against his argument. You said absolutely nothing about the part of my post that you
quoted!
Since you seem to fancy yourself a master of logical construction, you should recognize that red herrings in the form of ad hominems don't make good arguments. You're calling me an idiot and making an objection that has nothing to do with the validity of my subsequent statement, and then pretending that you've defeated my argument. If you aren't going to address the real argument, just shut up. You aren't contributing anything useful.
Modifié par Pauravi, 18 février 2010 - 12:58 .