158 réponses à ce sujet

[meznaric]

The Council has always disbelieved the Reaper theory. Do you think they will become convinced in ME3 or will Shepard save the galaxy without their help while the Council still thinks it was just vivid imagination?

[Alexandus]

The Council is full of weak-minded socialist politicians who will always convince themselves a problem does not exist rather than facing it.



Cerberus + Shepard = Dead Reapers



Council = Dead Galaxy



I'd go with Cerby and Shep.

[meznaric]

Hey, socialist does not equal weak minded!

[Thompson family]

I'm beginning to doubt that the council will ever wake up. The salarian member is at least as bad as the Turian. He's just more polite about it. And the Asari the same, only more tactful still. Anderson's the only member on the council who's even considering the possibility.

The only thing that might convince them is the arrival of the Reapers — and they'll be the first people killed.

Modifié par Thompson family, 16 février 2010 - 07:47 .

[SelphieSK]

Unless something REALLY big happens, I doubt they'll ever believe him.

[meznaric]

Is it possible that the Citadel is somehow affecting them to not believe it?

[Tleining]

At the end of ME2 you have definite proof. Yeah, they are going to believe you. Of course the Turian won't, but no surprise there

[Forst1999]

Oh, they will believe Shepard. He just have to talk to the Salarian, to beat up the Turian and to bang the Asari.

Seriously i believe ME 3 is about convincing the Galaxy that the Reapers are real. Bring proof to the Council, rally the Krogans, make peace with the Batarians, unite Quarians and Geth and so on.

[Sith Reaper]

meznaric wrote...

Hey, socialist does not equal weak minded!

Yeah. I actually laughed out loud because it seems the guy doesn't know what being a socialist means.

[Alexandus]

meznaric wrote...

Hey, socialist does not equal weak minded!

I said Socialist AND weak-minded. Not that Socialist = weak-minded.

But while we're on the subject, that is a path that will LEAD to weakness and stagnation, it perverts the natural order, which is Darwinian Chaos. In a perfect world, it would work, if we lacked individuality, it would work, but it isn't that way.

Sith Reaper wrote...

Yeah. I actually laughed out loud because it seems the guy doesn't know what being a socialist means.

*blinks* lol, I know what Socialist means, I was simply assuming the council was inclined that way based on how they've acted thus far. Just a guess, calm down.

Modifié par Alexandus, 16 février 2010 - 07:50 .

[DrinkableChris]

Wait, how do you have definite proof?



Is it that datapad with the reaper pictures? I always wondered if EDI was busy hacking stuff for information during the suicide mission.

[Nastrod]

I think the council was designed from the image of the 3 monkeys you know the ones with hands over the eyes, other ears, other mouth.





Which means no they will never see the truth

[Sith Reaper]

Forst1999 wrote...



Oh, they will believe Shepard. He just have to talk to the Salarian, to beat up the Turian and to bang the Asari.

Seriously i believe ME 3 is about convincing the Galaxy that the Reapers are real. Bring proof to the Council, rally the Krogans, make peace with the Batarians, unite Quarians and Geth and so on.

I agree, I loved the hints at what the plot would be like in ME3. Very much anticipating.

[Brijenieve]

Any Harry Potter fans feel like this is familiar? Think of Fudge (the character, not the food. Though if you'd like to think of the food, you're welcome to do that as well... it just isn't relevant. ).

I guess for me, the question is not "Will they believe," but "Will it be too late by the time they finally do?" So many lives, already, could have been saved if they'd been more supportive of Shepard and taken him/her at his/her word.

Modifié par Brijenieve, 16 février 2010 - 07:50 .

[Aranwen1]

no, thats why i let them die the first time and i will likely let them die agian



but i will save Anderson somehow.

[meznaric]

But wouldn't they just think the Collectors were acting on their own? I mean what proof do we have that the Collectors are acting on behalf of the Reapers?

[Big_Choppa]

antilles333 wrote...

They will when Harbinger has his boot up their asses.

I laughed when I read that one. Though you have more confidence than I do in them. I think the line in Oblivion when you're sneaking fits this perfectly. "Must have been the wind!" 

[TudorWolf]

Personally I think it's the Turian who's leading the charge on the disbelieving.



I reckon if you could off him somehow the other two would be much more willing to listen

[Sith Reaper]

Alexandus wrote...

meznaric wrote...

Hey, socialist does not equal weak minded!

I said Socialist AND weak-minded. Not that Socialist = weak-minded.

But while we're on the subject, that is a path that will LEAD to weakness and stagnation, it perverts the natural order, which is Darwinian Chaos. In a perfect world, it would work, if we lacked individuality, it would work, but it isn't that way.

This isn't a political discussion topic. So I say let's stop posting here.

Also, I fail to see how socialism leads to weakness, stagnation, and "Dawrinian Chaos." But not here.

Modifié par Sith Reaper, 16 février 2010 - 07:54 .

[GenericPlayer2]

I don't think it will be an issue. My guess is that the Citadel will be destroyed in the opening sequence for ME3. So saving the council or killing it in ME1 is largely irrelevant.

[meznaric]

TudorWolf wrote...

Personally I think it's the Turian who's leading the charge on the disbelieving.

I reckon if you could off him somehow the other two would be much more willing to listen

Yeah, because he doesn't want to believe Saren, a Turian, was collaborating. Just imagine the political fallout.

[Thompson family]

Mark my words. ME 3 will start with Shepard and his loyal crew on the run from everybody: the Council, the Alliance, Cerberus. Then the Reapers will show up.

[meznaric]

Sith Reaper wrote...

Alexandus wrote...

meznaric wrote...

Hey, socialist does not equal weak minded!

I said Socialist AND weak-minded. Not that Socialist = weak-minded.

But while we're on the subject, that is a path that will LEAD to weakness and stagnation, it perverts the natural order, which is Darwinian Chaos. In a perfect world, it would work, if we lacked individuality, it would work, but it isn't that way.

This isn't a political discussion topic. So I say let's stop posting here.

Also, I would very much love to hear how socialism leads to weakness, stagnation, and "Dawrinian Chaos."

I have a feeling he thinks socialism and communism are the same...