Here it is, plain and simple for all the people who say The Architect is not the purple guy with the gold strip covering his eyes. Go to the Dragon Age website and on the page it should have two updates for Feb 16th. One of the updates should say "New Dragon Age Awakening Website". In the subtext it says "Come face to face with The Architect, ..." The Architect is a link...click on it...see The Architect. End of story.
True Identity of The Architect
Débuté par
MClover
, févr. 17 2010 02:43
Retour en haut
#2
Posté 17 février 2010 - 02:46
melkathi
-
- Members
- 1 296 messages
MClover, the way the forum is going, I fear that even after we have impaled the Architect on a two handed sword, there will still be people claiming thatthat wasn't him 
#3
Posté 17 février 2010 - 02:56
_Aine_
-
- Members
- 1 861 messages
Do you mean thats not really Duncan?
*runs away cackling gleefully (though in a thoroughly tainted fashion, of course...)*
*runs away cackling gleefully (though in a thoroughly tainted fashion, of course...)*
#6
Posté 17 février 2010 - 03:05
MClover
-
- Members
- 95 messages
That link doesn't really confirm it at all considering the original thread name was "Lich Guy...kinda hawt" and didn't mention The Architect at all. There were still debates going on a few days ago and today we finally got a subtle confirmation from Bioware about who The Architect is.
#7
Posté 17 février 2010 - 03:12
Godak
-
- Members
- 3 550 messages
If he is the Architect, then there are continuity errors with "The Calling". I demand that BioWare admits their mistake before I accept the facts!
Modifié par Godak, 17 février 2010 - 03:12 .
#8
Posté 17 février 2010 - 03:25
Maria Caliban
-
- Members
- 26 094 messages
MClover wrote...
That link doesn't really confirm it at all considering the original thread name was "Lich Guy...kinda hawt" and didn't mention The Architect at all. There were still debates going on a few days ago and today we finally got a subtle confirmation from Bioware about who The Architect is.
Except then the thread starter (myself) PMed David to ask if it was the Architect (cause I didn't think it was) and he told me lich guy is the Architect.
Which is why I updated the thread title.
Modifié par Maria Caliban, 17 février 2010 - 03:26 .
#9
Posté 17 février 2010 - 03:26
Godak
-
- Members
- 3 550 messages
Maria Caliban wrote...
MClover wrote...
That link doesn't really confirm it at all considering the original thread name was "Lich Guy...kinda hawt" and didn't mention The Architect at all. There were still debates going on a few days ago and today we finally got a subtle confirmation from Bioware about who The Architect is.
Except then the thread started (myself) PMed David to ask if it was the Architect (cause I didn't think it was) and he told me lich guy is the Architect.
There it is again! You think we can be won over with 'facts' and 'truth'...Foul harlot, be gone!
#10
Posté 17 février 2010 - 03:46
Nhadalie
-
- Members
- 945 messages
Yes. Instead we should all assume that he is the hot lich/darkspawn romance option that doesn't really exist.
Er.. Oops. XD
Er.. Oops. XD
#11
Posté 17 février 2010 - 05:24
bluecuban
-
- Members
- 211 messages
So what you're saying is, the ugly darkspawn who pushes a soldier off the side of that castle is Duncan? Nah, I already figured the lich guy was the Architect. Makes sense considering his dialog in the original trailer.
#12
Posté 17 février 2010 - 06:23
Angel of Nessus
-
- Members
- 393 messages
Honestly, I don't see why people call him "Lich Guy". It seems clear to me that the ribcage pattern on his chest is just that- on his chest. If anything, he looks like a guy corrupted by a Lovecraftian Old God.
#13
Posté 17 février 2010 - 06:31
Demx
-
- Members
- 3 738 messages
Nhadalie wrote...
Yes. Instead we should all assume that he is the hot lich/darkspawn romance option that doesn't really exist.
Er.. Oops. XD
That would explain why the romances don't carry over.
@Angel of Nessus
Lich - a dead body; corpse.
Modifié par Siradix, 17 février 2010 - 06:33 .
#14
Posté 17 février 2010 - 06:41
Dermain
-
- Members
- 4 476 messages
Siradix wrote...
Nhadalie wrote...
Yes. Instead we should all assume that he is the hot lich/darkspawn romance option that doesn't really exist.
Er.. Oops. XD
That would explain why the romances don't carry over.
@Angel of Nessus
Lich - a dead body; corpse.
Nerd Definition of Lich - Powerful undead wizard that has a habit of killing stupid adventuerers.
#15
Posté 17 février 2010 - 06:46
Demx
-
- Members
- 3 738 messages
lol Man I gotta brush up on my nerd lingo.
#16
Posté 17 février 2010 - 07:13
Angel of Nessus
-
- Members
- 393 messages
I know perfectly well what a lich is, both by etymology and fantasy interpretation , but he looks nothing like one. As I said, the ribcage is the only thing that makes him resemble a corpse (apart from skin color, which can be attributed to his bad case of NOT BEING HUMAN).Siradix wrote...
Nhadalie wrote...
Yes. Instead we should all assume that he is the hot lich/darkspawn romance option that doesn't really exist.
Er.. Oops. XD
That would explain why the romances don't carry over.
@Angel of Nessus
Lich - a dead body; corpse.
#17
Posté 17 février 2010 - 07:15
Maria Caliban
-
- Members
- 26 094 messages
Angel of Nessus wrote...
Honestly, I don't see why people call him "Lich Guy".
I called him Lich Guy because I thought he was a lich.
#18
Posté 17 février 2010 - 07:21
Demx
-
- Members
- 3 738 messages
Well he is a darkspawn mage, some darkspawns were once humans. Are darkspawn considered dead though?
#19
Posté 17 février 2010 - 07:32
Maria Caliban
-
- Members
- 26 094 messages
Siradix wrote...
Well he is a darkspawn mage, some darkspawns were once humans. Are darkspawn considered dead though?
No, but I didn't know he was a dorkspawn when I called him lich guy.
#20
Posté 17 février 2010 - 08:15
Angel of Nessus
-
- Members
- 393 messages
FAIR ENOUGH.Maria Caliban wrote...
Siradix wrote...
Well he is a darkspawn mage, some darkspawns were once humans. Are darkspawn considered dead though?
No, but I didn't know he was a dorkspawn when I called him lich guy.
@Siradix:
I was under the impression that most all of them used to be mortals; hurlocks are former humans, genlocks were dwarves, shriekers were elves and ogres were qunari. I think. Or was that just the Broodmothers that spawn them?
Modifié par Angel of Nessus, 17 février 2010 - 08:16 .
#21
Posté 17 février 2010 - 09:23
Feraele
-
- Members
- 3 119 messages
Angel of Nessus wrote...
I know perfectly well what a lich is, both by etymology and fantasy interpretation , but he looks nothing like one. As I said, the ribcage is the only thing that makes him resemble a corpse (apart from skin color, which can be attributed to his bad case of NOT BEING HUMAN).Siradix wrote...
Nhadalie wrote...
Yes. Instead we should all assume that he is the hot lich/darkspawn romance option that doesn't really exist.
Er.. Oops. XD
That would explain why the romances don't carry over.
@Angel of Nessus
Lich - a dead body; corpse.
He looks kind of snaky.....was looking at that thing on the side of his head.
#22
Posté 17 février 2010 - 09:25
Feraele
-
- Members
- 3 119 messages
Maria Caliban wrote...
Siradix wrote...
Well he is a darkspawn mage, some darkspawns were once humans. Are darkspawn considered dead though?
No, but I didn't know he was a dorkspawn when I called him lich guy.
Okay bear in mind I haven't read the books, but I am wondering if he was one of the Original mages cast out by the Maker? Can still see his "humanity" somewhat...just not sure what that snaky thing is on the side of his head, unless its just some kind of fancy helmet. Or unless he can spawn things out of his head. lol
#23
Posté 17 février 2010 - 09:27
Feraele
-
- Members
- 3 119 messages
Darkspawn are considered soulless husks...so dead I suppose. But what gives them energy to move around..kill etc if so?
#24
Posté 17 février 2010 - 09:28
Feraele
-
- Members
- 3 119 messages
Angel of Nessus wrote...
FAIR ENOUGH.Maria Caliban wrote...
Siradix wrote...
Well he is a darkspawn mage, some darkspawns were once humans. Are darkspawn considered dead though?
No, but I didn't know he was a dorkspawn when I called him lich guy.
@Siradix:
I was under the impression that most all of them used to be mortals; hurlocks are former humans, genlocks were dwarves, shriekers were elves and ogres were qunari. I think. Or was that just the Broodmothers that spawn them?
Depends on the original race of the broodmother before they were transformed to broodmother.
Elven broodmother produces Shrieks, Dwarven broodmother produces genlocks, Human broodmother produces hurlocks, qunari broodmother produces ogres.
#25
Posté 17 février 2010 - 09:29
Dick Delaware
-
- Members
- 794 messages
Back to the topic, considering his exotic, regal appearance and desire to kill of the Old Gods, I'd say he might be one of the ancient Tevinter Magisters. I've only read a summary of The Calling from dragonagewiki.com, so I don't have the nuanced information that a person who's read it would, though.
Modifié par Dick Delaware, 17 février 2010 - 09:30 .
