Vanguard - Claymore vs AR
#1
Posté 17 février 2010 - 04:31
What are your thoughts?
#2
Posté 17 février 2010 - 04:35
#3
Posté 17 février 2010 - 04:36
#4
Posté 17 février 2010 - 04:45
#5
Posté 17 février 2010 - 05:10
#6
Posté 17 février 2010 - 05:13
#7
Posté 17 février 2010 - 05:14
#8
Posté 17 février 2010 - 05:17
#9
Posté 17 février 2010 - 05:22
mattp420 wrote...
You don't find it redundant that you have SMG and AR?
this^
once you get the Tempest it's silly to pick up the Avenger AR, you'd only be using the Vindicator BR and while it's a good weapon I find the Viper sniper rifle to be the superior rapid-fire accuracy-centric weapon. You'll get more range and power out of the Viper, it makes for a very well rounded weapon set.
Still it's personal choice when deciding to take a different weapon type or an advanced weapon. I guess the question is, do you want to specialize in your class' niche or do you want to be a well rounded fighter with a tool for any situation?
#10
Posté 17 février 2010 - 05:27
#11
Posté 17 février 2010 - 05:31
Riot Inducer wrote...
mattp420 wrote...
You don't find it redundant that you have SMG and AR?
this^
once you get the Tempest it's silly to pick up the Avenger AR, you'd only be using the Vindicator BR and while it's a good weapon I find the Viper sniper rifle to be the superior rapid-fire accuracy-centric weapon. You'll get more range and power out of the Viper, it makes for a very well rounded weapon set.
Still it's personal choice when deciding to take a different weapon type or an advanced weapon. I guess the question is, do you want to specialize in your class' niche or do you want to be a well rounded fighter with a tool for any situation?
I would personally take the Vindicator over the Viper for my Vanguard. Once you get the AR accuracy upgrade its essentially a sniper without a scope. It can also substitute for your shotgun in a pinch. I would only take the Claymore over the Evi if you know how to do the Claymore trick regularly.
Modifié par RamsenC, 17 février 2010 - 05:35 .
#12
Posté 17 février 2010 - 05:40
#13
Posté 17 février 2010 - 05:43
#14
Posté 17 février 2010 - 06:08
I personally prefer the flexibility of another weapon, be that Vindicator or a sniper.
#15
Posté 17 février 2010 - 08:42
You dun have to build your shepard to be an all rounder. You have squad members to do that for you.
So for power centric classes, adepts, sentinels and engineers, pick the AR...or if you want some fun, the sniper, to complement your lack of weapon training.
For a vanguard. Take the claymore, cause it's what you do best.
#16
Posté 04 mars 2010 - 09:29
EverteMax wrote...
Well...food for thought. I think what you pick...powers and advance weapon training should complement your class style. For instance, infiltrators are long range, so as Adepts (with powers), Engineers and Sentinels. Soldiers and Vanguards are short to mid-range classes.
You dun have to build your shepard to be an all rounder. You have squad members to do that for you.
So for power centric classes, adepts, sentinels and engineers, pick the AR...or if you want some fun, the sniper, to complement your lack of weapon training.
For a vanguard. Take the claymore, cause it's what you do best.
I would argue with that because IMO you can actually play more aggressively with the vanguard when you take the vindicator. It allows you to constantly hurt your enemies and even occasionally charge into situations that the shotgun alone wouldn't be able to handle. The key is mastering weapon transitions. If you can switch weapons at the right times in combat, the vinticator/eviscerator combo is lethal. Also vindicator/scimitar is amazingly versatile. I think the beauty of the vanguard class is that there is no optimal build weapon-wise.
Personally, I don't like picking the sniper rifle with the vanguard. The vanguard's class provides bonuses for weapon damage that make it equally as effective as a soldier with the AR however without the adrenaline rush or cloak bonuses for slowdown and damage, the sniper rifle really loses its luster in the hands of a vanguard. Also I find that using the sniper rifle is too time consuming and takes me out of the vanguard play style. It's sort of like you have to stop being a vanguard for a moment to mess around with a sniper rifle and then you start playing again. The vindicator actually provides a beautiful synergy with the shotgun as it fills in the blanks in those situations when you're at mid range preparing to charge or just after a charge.
Taking the claymore is great and that's what I did at first with this class but I find that there's a major difference between taking the Claymore with the vanguard and taking the widow with the infiltrator. With the infiltrator; if you play the class as a sniper, the widow is the clear decision to make. It is a superior sniper rifle. The claymore is not clearly superior to the other shotguns. It can be the best if you're a crack shot and can do the reload trick consistently but the eviscerator is also very powerful with better range and without having the reload problem and the scimitar is extremely versatile with its speed.
I found that the claymore was great for finishing people off but it often required much more patience when it came to softening them up. With the vindicator, I was able to lay down steady damage to my oponents at all times and still finish them off brutally at point blank range with the eviscerator. This was my preference.
#17
Posté 04 mars 2010 - 09:59
As for the claymore, I doubt I'll ever take it. I like the flexibility the SR gives me to much, and the damage isn't that much better than the Eviscerator
#18
Posté 04 mars 2010 - 10:17
#19
Posté 04 mars 2010 - 10:28
#20
Posté 04 mars 2010 - 10:42
Pharsyde99 wrote...
I'm not sure I picked correctly here but I opted for the AR once I got the chance. The shotty is nice but I hated having to use the heavy pistol to do any damage at range.
What are your thoughts?
ARs are fine on a Vanguard. So long as you pick a Vindicator, you have yourself a nice, flexible arsenal.
The Claymore, in my opinion, is a waste of time. It does huge amounts of damage per shot but carries with it a raft of disadvantages. Low ammo, no range to speak of, costs you the option of more flexibility... it just doesn't bring much more to the table than the Eviscerator. Certainly nowhere near enough to justify all the downsides.
#21
Posté 05 mars 2010 - 12:54
I think some people are assault vanguards and some people are heavy vanguards.
My survivability and killerability goes severely down without the claymore.
#22
Posté 05 mars 2010 - 12:59
Modifié par Atheist Peace, 05 mars 2010 - 01:00 .
#23
Posté 05 mars 2010 - 02:00
xedgorex wrote...
It really depends on your playstyle, my first playthrough i grabbed the Claymore and had a hell of a time getting used to it, on my second playthrough i was using the evi > then scimitar and grabbed the sniper rifle. But i couldnt do it, i reloaded and grabbed the claymore and haven't looked back.
I think some people are assault vanguards and some people are heavy vanguards.
My survivability and killerability goes severely down without the claymore.
Exactly that. To each their own. Myself? I can't leave that ship without the Claymore. Without it I don't feel safe or confident. The Claymore just feels right.
#24
Posté 05 mars 2010 - 02:40
#25
Posté 05 mars 2010 - 02:46
As far as having an smg and ar at the same time. They are not redundant, smgs are for shields/barriers, ar's can do everything fairly well.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






