The geth are right. Who agrees?
#1
Posté 17 février 2010 - 10:12
I thought that was a fairly obvious message,
but on browsing these forums I've seen a lot of people who, having
played the game, still think the geth are essentially 'bad guys'. I
haven't seen any topics specifically discussing the issue, though, and
'moral grey areas' like this are what I love most about Bioware games
and good RPGs in general. Of course, there's a little more depth to it than my strawman-Tali presents, but basically my point is that everything I've seen suggests that Legion's geth have always acted quite reasonably. Certainly more so than the Quarians, and more so than most organic species would have if placed in their position. The Heretics, as explained in the game, are a separate faction. I'm referring only to Legion's faction, and to judge them by the actions of the heretics would be analogous to judging present-day humanity by the actions of the North Korean government or some such. I'd be very disappointed if Mass Effect 3 railroaded the player into supporting the Quarians against the Geth, but based on the way this game treats the subject, I'm confident that won't happen.
Anyway, I just thought it was an interesting point for discussion, I hope it catches on. Who agrees, who doesn't?
#2
Posté 17 février 2010 - 10:15
#3
Posté 17 février 2010 - 10:17
I suspect this issue will figure prominently in ME3.
#4
Posté 17 février 2010 - 10:23
Reapers don't fear organics as much as AI they can create. If organics learn to cooperate with advanced AI the Reapers are doomed.
And after ME2 ... you have EDI and the Geth, both have proven to be able to mess up some really good Reaper plans. Specificaly, without EDI super-hacking your mission would have failed miserably ...
So, could being "friendly" with AI be the key to victory? Could it also be the reason reapers exist? Since their makers couldn't accomplish that they were taken over?
Modifié par PingoBlack, 17 février 2010 - 10:24 .
#5
Posté 17 février 2010 - 10:24
#6
Posté 17 février 2010 - 10:26
rwscissors: She does indeed, I'm replaying ME1 now and that conversation is what prompted me to post this.
#7
Posté 17 février 2010 - 10:31
Modifié par didymos1120, 17 février 2010 - 10:32 .
#8
Posté 17 février 2010 - 10:36
Also, the reason for the "Morning War", as Legion calls it, is a little less straightforward than that. The Quarians did not really attempt to kill the Geth -- or rather, they did, but they were not aware of the ramifications at the time.
Tali explains in ME1 that the Quarians had hoped that the incident was isolated, and that the attempt to shut down the Geth was done as a precaution rather than an act of war or violence. Obviously the Geth felt threatened, though, and war ensued.
The problem is that after drifting in space for 300 years, the Quarians are holding a bit of a grudge. I have a feeling that part of ME3 is going to revolve around convincing the Quarians that the Geth are not to be hated, and convincing the Geth that the Quarians can be trusted. The Geth do not harbor grudges, but they are also weary.
Modifié par Pauravi, 17 février 2010 - 10:36 .
#9
Posté 17 février 2010 - 10:36
#10
Posté 17 février 2010 - 10:46
#11
Posté 17 février 2010 - 10:54
If you think that nuclear bombs are a threat, that the geth are too, sure. But the nuclear bombs are no threat. It's the irresponsible people, who have access to them, that are the threat. The same goes to the Geth. Reapers are a threat (obvious). And Quarians, who wan to destroy or super-hack the Geth are a threat.
#12
Posté 17 février 2010 - 10:56
#13
Posté 17 février 2010 - 10:59
The Geth aren't evil or bad, but they are amoral -- they don't have moral values in the same way most other races do, and they are motivated by things that are truly alien. Legion and other Geth certainly wouldn't hesitate one bit if one day, their computations revealed that the future of the Geth involved killing Shepard, Humans, or all biological life in the galaxy.
Modifié par Empiro, 17 février 2010 - 11:01 .
#14
Posté 17 février 2010 - 11:02
DAMN QUARIANS....
though quarians and geth are prob my fav races in ME2 tbf
#15
Posté 17 février 2010 - 11:03
Pauravi wrote...
Tali explains in ME1 that the Quarians had hoped that the incident was isolated, and that the attempt to shut down the Geth was done as a precaution rather than an act of war or violence. Obviously the Geth felt threatened, though, and war ensued.
A precaution by taking out the sapient ones because maybe their sapience was isolated? that's assclown reasoning for genocide if i ever heard one.
#16
Posté 17 février 2010 - 11:08
#17
Posté 17 février 2010 - 11:08
Tahleron1 wrote...
Pauravi wrote...
Tali explains in ME1 that the Quarians had hoped that the incident was isolated, and that the attempt to shut down the Geth was done as a precaution rather than an act of war or violence. Obviously the Geth felt threatened, though, and war ensued.
A precaution by taking out the sapient ones because maybe their sapience was isolated? that's assclown reasoning for genocide if i ever heard one.
The data about the early days of the war is quite lacking, I have to say. It's difficult to discern the exact motivations. It could range anywhere from panicked hysteria and brutal genocide all the way down to the Quarian leadership honestly believing that the Geth being ordered to shut down weren't yet sentient, but could become so at any moment, and the Geth responding brutally and butchering people who had absolutely nothing to do with the shutdown, just because the Geth don't see killing as wrong.
Modifié par Empiro, 17 février 2010 - 11:12 .
#18
Posté 17 février 2010 - 11:11
Well, first of all they didn't just try to remove sapient ones, they just issued a shutdown order. The bigger point is that they did not understand the degree to which the Geth had attained higher thinking. After all, for many years they were simply very advanced appliances, and they were used to thinking of them in those terms. They were trying to prevent them from attaining sentience, not kill a race that they knew to be sentient already.Tahleron1 wrote...
Pauravi wrote...
Tali explains in ME1 that the Quarians had hoped that the incident was isolated, and that the attempt to shut down the Geth was done as a precaution rather than an act of war or violence. Obviously the Geth felt threatened, though, and war ensued.
A precaution by taking out the sapient ones because maybe their sapience was isolated? that's assclown reasoning for genocide if i ever heard one.
I didn't say I agreed with it, I only pointed out that it wasn't as black and white as the Hitler scenario that people are describing it as.
#19
Posté 17 février 2010 - 11:11
#20
Posté 17 février 2010 - 11:12
Empiro wrote...
Tahleron1 wrote...
Pauravi wrote...
Tali explains in ME1 that the Quarians had hoped that the incident was isolated, and that the attempt to shut down the Geth was done as a precaution rather than an act of war or violence. Obviously the Geth felt threatened, though, and war ensued.
A precaution by taking out the sapient ones because maybe their sapience was isolated? that's assclown reasoning for genocide if i ever heard one.
The data about the early days of the way is quite lacking, I have to say. It's difficult to discern the exact motivations. It could range anywhere from panicked hysteria and brutal genocide all the way down to the Quarian leadership honestly believing that the Geth being ordered to shut down weren't yet sentient, but could become so at any moment, and the Geth responding brutally and butchering people who had absolutely nothing to do with the shutdown, just because the Geth don't see killing as wrong.
it would be fairly similar to our own species right now, where the last thing a monkey would want to do is learn to talk
Listen to Legion's recording, how that could possibly not be construed as a sapient action is beyond me.
I'm not saying the Geth are all innocent, in fact I'd expect some of their reasoning were to permanently cripple the quarians ability to ever strike back (or at least it would be mine...)
Modifié par Tahleron1, 17 février 2010 - 11:15 .
#21
Posté 17 février 2010 - 11:12
Empiro wrote...
The data about the early days of the war is quite lacking, I have to say. It's difficult to discern the exact motivations. It could range anywhere from panicked hysteria and brutal genocide all the way down to the Quarian leadership honestly believing that the Geth being ordered to shut down weren't yet sentient, but could become so at any moment, and the Geth responding brutally and butchering people who had absolutely nothing to do with the shutdown, just because the Geth don't see killing as wrong.
Exactly.
#22
Posté 17 février 2010 - 11:18
#23
Posté 17 février 2010 - 11:21
#24
Posté 17 février 2010 - 11:22
Tahleron1 wrote...
it would be fairly similar to our own species right now, where the last thing a monkey would want to do is learn to talk![]()
I don't think it is similar to that at all.
Monkeys are an organic species that evolved naturally; it was not built by us, and we haven't been using them as tools and appliances for years.
I have a feeling that if peoples toasters suddenly started asking questions like "who am I?", that a great many people would freak out and unplug it. IMO, that is a more apt comparison.
Modifié par Pauravi, 17 février 2010 - 11:29 .
#25
Posté 17 février 2010 - 11:30
If you look at it, the Geth are terrible, they are like big space bullies. It is not even like they are using it. A perfectly good planet is wasted and the Quarians are stuck in space. I am sure this sets the stage for some uber Paragon resolution of the Quarians coming home if they can make peace with the Geth. But aside from that, they are just blocking it really.
I am not saying I am not sympathetic to the Geth plight, though their Morning War was a war of self-defense. Plus the Quarians are still keen on kicking them one day. They are not exactly angels either. I think Bioware ment it that way.





Retour en haut




