Gibb_Shepard wrote...
I'm sorry, but the alliance giving you life in prison after you saved the galaxy twice, the first time being on an epic scale of saving the galaxy, would just be bad writing. They already made me facepalm when the council denied the existence of reapers in ME2, i will most likely hit myself over the head with a brick if they make the alliance this stupidly retarded.
The second time you saved the Galaxy is too hush-hush to count. And the first one ended with... oh, well...
ashwind wrote...
How could the alliance do anything to Shepard if he got reinstated as Spectre. Spectres only answer to the Council and if/when a Spectre goes rogue, they send another Spectre after them - after they revoke his/her status 
I said in the OP that Shepard's trial may be purely Council's action. But for the sake of simplicity of game development both the Old Council and Human-led Council can "outsource" the problem to the Alliance, especially since the Alliance might very well volunteer to deal with you.
DarkSeraphym wrote...
However, I do have a question that I noticed a page or two back. Why should the Illusive Man dislike Shepard merely out of the fact that he can be kind of snippy to him? I can certainly see why the Illusive Man wouldn't exactly be appreciative of it, but regardless Renegade Shepard always gets the job done for Cerberus. To be honest, Shepard seems to be better at getting the job done than any of TIM's other employees. Besides, TIM always struck me as an opportunist anyways. So what if Shepard's attitude is a little off, he still brings home the bacon.
There is a number of considerations why TIM may so much as instigate Shepard's imprisonment, even in the case of Human-led Council, Cerberus not being really rogue and Shepard's full loyalty to Cerberus:
First, PR. Show the aliens that there aren't untoucheable people in the Alliance, when it comes to fighting corruption in its own midst. And, of course, the deniability again, uphold the legend of Cerberus being "avowed enemy", especially as it's not a secret in certain circles, that Shepard's been working with Cerberus.
Secondly, with all the mess Admiral Anderson put Cerberus through, and no immediate threat of the Reapers, TIM might want to conserve Shepard. Make sure the Commander can't get himself in some trouble or jeopardy, while Cerberus is recovering and Shepard's services aren't required.
If that's the case (for example TIM signalling Adm. Hackett to give the green light to Shepard's apprehension, and maybe even sending Shepard to the trap = "Alliance DLC", *Ta-Da!* = ), it may be used to antagonize Shepard and TIM, if that's where the writers want the story to go. The only problem is that it's still falling short of "TIM = evil" scenario, which leaves room for the Cerberus Loyalist Shepard to reconcile with this ordeal.
DarkSeraphym wrote...
By the way, I just wanted to comment that I found it very fascinating in LOTSB's dossiers on Hackett where Hackett replies "Request denied." Although it is very short and doesn't say a whole lot in of itself, I think that adds a little more evidence into the pile of your belief that Cerberus never actually went "rogue" on the Alliance. I'm not sure why else Hackett would deny the Alliance the ability to arrest him.
That's what even the people that deny my "Cerberus = Alliance" theory get from it too, but they tend to go "Oh, what a bastard Admiral Hackett is! He is a Cerberus infiltrator!" To them the Systems Alliance is still a "US in space minus the GOP", and will remain exactly that even if 100% of its officials become Cerberus infiltrators... In which case Turian policing it 100% of the time will be more preferable than allowing pro-Human sentiment to be exercised.
Modifié par Zulu_DFA, 06 octobre 2010 - 02:47 .