www.youtube.com/watch
Modifié par vigna, 03 mars 2010 - 08:10 .
Modifié par vigna, 03 mars 2010 - 08:10 .
Driveninhifi wrote...
I do hope we get to work him over in ME3, with the option of either turning him into the Alliance (which he probably has plants in), the Council (who will probably just execute him) or just shooting him in the face.
Guest_General Stubbs_*
Could be, does anyone even know what Martin Sheen does on a daily basis...Sakhalin wrote...
Shadowcat101 wrote...
screwoffreg wrote...
So the Shadow Broker and TIM are very similiar I imagine. The Shadow Broker is probably Chaotic Neutral and TIM Lawful Evil.
I think the shadow broker IS TIM. I’m sure other people have said this. When you talk to him about Liara, he has little to say and just says “she is working for the shadow broker, and can’t be trusted.”
But as we find out later, Liara is looking to hunt down the shadow broker. So TIM lied to shepherd. Also TIM is always going on about how his business in information, like the shadow broker. So why would he have bad intell on who Liara is working for? Unless something happened between them, making TIM hate Liara.
The only bit that does not fit is why would liara have to steal shepherd’s bodys from the shadow broker (TIM), to only give it back to him?
My best guess to this is different Cerberus cells doing different things…
Guess we’ll find out in ME3
But why would TIM (Shadow broker) sell Shepard to the Collectors when TIM wanted the body in the first place? Maybe he has a split personality disorder, lol!
Modifié par General Stubbs, 03 mars 2010 - 08:19 .
Driveninhifi wrote...
Really, it's most likely a combination of a) running out of development timenot wanting to spoil the comics and c) wanting the leave the player in the dark so they go to the new love interests.
Guest_justinnstuff_*
Deamon023 wrote...
justinnstuff wrote...
Yeled wrote...
@ G Stubbs: Its true. This is a really good thread. Full of good content and good discussion and very little trolling or arguments.
Yup. We have a ton of in-depth discussion about Liara. None of it leads to stupid flames either. After visiting a bunch of threads on this forum, this one has me the most occupied.
"24/7" the only Thread I keep coming back to
Liara(sry² had to show some affection to the blue godess)
²NoT
Guest_LesEnfantsTerribles_*
Driveninhifi wrote...
Really, it's most likely a combination of a) running out of development timenot wanting to spoil the comics and c) wanting the leave the player in the dark so they go to the new love interests.
It is pretty lame, and totally unrealistic. The head shake may have been the animators trying to have her imply they can't talk about "THEM" but I think it's too subtle. There needed to be some very obvious reason why Shepard cannot talk about their relationship, or at least have her tell Shepard to come back alive.
Guest_justinnstuff_*
ratzerman wrote...
Holy crap....... I love this idea! But, come on...... it's gotta be too good to be true, right?LesEnfantsTerribles wrote...
jlb524 wrote...
Good idea. This would also explain why Liara shakes her head after kissing Shepard. Liara's being a bad girl, doing something she ought not be doing
It makes it all the more sweet, as even though TIM explicity forbids her from any contact with Shepard, she still can't resist running up to him/her and smooching Shepard. D'awwww, Liara!
There's no way the current roster of Bioware writers could come up with something that awesome..... could they?
Guest_justinnstuff_*
Sakhalin wrote...
Yeah I blew up the base too, TIM can suck it! I don't know what else he said because all I heard was "bull****" on the line. And my second in command resigned from Cerberus. w00t
bjdbwea wrote...
Driveninhifi wrote...
Really, it's most likely a combination of a) running out of development timenot wanting to spoil the comics and c) wanting the leave the player in the dark so they go to the new love interests.
Yeah, exactly. As nice as some hopeful interpretations in this thread here are, I simply doubt they put any much of that thought into it. What you said is what I assume too. But none of those three explanations, nor their combination, is any excuse for screwing this up so badly.
Guest_justinnstuff_*
LesEnfantsTerribles wrote...
Also, don't forget that the Game Developer's Conference will start of the 9th March, and there are rumours that BioWare will be showing some DLC there. Could be the Liara DLC.
justinnstuff wrote...
Sakhalin wrote...
Yeah I blew up the base too, TIM can suck it! I don't know what else he said because all I heard was "bull****" on the line. And my second in command resigned from Cerberus. w00t
Miranda quitting Cerberus was a shocker to me. I didn't see that coming, but it was awesome nonetheless. Shepard can make even a diehard become loyal to him.
Nozybidaj wrote...
bjdbwea wrote...
Driveninhifi wrote...
Really, it's most likely a combination of a) running out of development timenot wanting to spoil the comics and c) wanting the leave the player in the dark so they go to the new love interests.
Yeah, exactly. As nice as some hopeful interpretations in this thread here are, I simply doubt they put any much of that thought into it. What you said is what I assume too. But none of those three explanations, nor their combination, is any excuse for screwing this up so badly.
Agreed, no matter what the fact remains they dropped the ball from the start with ME2.
Driveninhifi wrote...
It's something I read on another forum, I have no idea if it's true. It does make some sense, especially with how #3 plays out.
It's implied that Feron works for Cerberus. Taz gets away from Feron and Liara at the end of #2 and takes Shepard to the Shadow Broker base. Miranda wants to chase them and The Illusive Man tells her to wait, saying "I've involved assets you aren't aware of" At the end of this issue, Feron says "I should probably tell you who I actually work for..."
This also explains why Feron might still be alive after 2 years - if he does work for Cerberus, the Shadow Broker would definitely try and get as much info out of him as possible.
We know Feron must die/get captured in #4. This leaves the Illusive Man without an agent to watch the Shadow Broker. We also know the Shadow Broker tends to kill people who cross/betray him (Fist in ME1, for example). So it makes sense the SB would put a large bounty on Liara's head. The Illusive Man could easily say "Want to see Shepard again? Work for me and we'll give you resources and protection. But you can't talk to Shepard and distract him from the mission we're giving him. If you do, we'll stop protecting you, and the Shadow Broker will kill you."
It also solves how she would take down the Shadow Broker once she found him: she doesn't have to worry about Cerberus' forces shooting her in the back during the mission.
It's actually a really interesting way to do it: the only other person that could possibly protect her is Shepard....who is currently on a Cerberus ship that staffed with a Cerberus crew. So she's really stuck - she has no choice but to stay silent if she ever wants to be with Shepard again. It still doesn't explain why Shepard can't say anything - but I think that's more a case of the writers trying to hold back than anything else (which is really lame, to be sure)
Guest_justinnstuff_*
Yeled wrote...
Nozybidaj wrote...
bjdbwea wrote...
Driveninhifi wrote...
Really, it's most likely a combination of a) running out of development timenot wanting to spoil the comics and c) wanting the leave the player in the dark so they go to the new love interests.
Yeah, exactly. As nice as some hopeful interpretations in this thread here are, I simply doubt they put any much of that thought into it. What you said is what I assume too. But none of those three explanations, nor their combination, is any excuse for screwing this up so badly.
Agreed, no matter what the fact remains they dropped the ball from the start with ME2.
That's the problem with all the speculation regarding brilliant, conveluted plots and motivations. It could all come down to laziness or sloppiness.
Guest_Littledoom_*
LesEnfantsTerribles wrote...
Also, don't forget that the Game Developer's Conference will start of the 9th March, and there are rumours that BioWare will be showing some DLC there. Could be the Liara DLC.
Guest_justinnstuff_*
Raanz wrote...
Driveninhifi wrote...
It's something I read on another forum, I have no idea if it's true. It does make some sense, especially with how #3 plays out.
It's implied that Feron works for Cerberus. Taz gets away from Feron and Liara at the end of #2 and takes Shepard to the Shadow Broker base. Miranda wants to chase them and The Illusive Man tells her to wait, saying "I've involved assets you aren't aware of" At the end of this issue, Feron says "I should probably tell you who I actually work for..."
This also explains why Feron might still be alive after 2 years - if he does work for Cerberus, the Shadow Broker would definitely try and get as much info out of him as possible.
We know Feron must die/get captured in #4. This leaves the Illusive Man without an agent to watch the Shadow Broker. We also know the Shadow Broker tends to kill people who cross/betray him (Fist in ME1, for example). So it makes sense the SB would put a large bounty on Liara's head. The Illusive Man could easily say "Want to see Shepard again? Work for me and we'll give you resources and protection. But you can't talk to Shepard and distract him from the mission we're giving him. If you do, we'll stop protecting you, and the Shadow Broker will kill you."
It also solves how she would take down the Shadow Broker once she found him: she doesn't have to worry about Cerberus' forces shooting her in the back during the mission.
It's actually a really interesting way to do it: the only other person that could possibly protect her is Shepard....who is currently on a Cerberus ship that staffed with a Cerberus crew. So she's really stuck - she has no choice but to stay silent if she ever wants to be with Shepard again. It still doesn't explain why Shepard can't say anything - but I think that's more a case of the writers trying to hold back than anything else (which is really lame, to be sure)
This^
The reason I tend to go with this theory is because it works regardless of love interest. If you really want to try and figure out what BW is up to, you have to look at it from that perspective. The story has to work in both scenarios.
As I have mentioned earlier in another thread, I am still under the impression that ME3 will have several "big" moral decisions..or just life and death decisions...one will include your love interest no matter who that is. If it happens to be Liara (like most of us in this thread), this talked about theory would play you right into it. Basically, you choose "saving" Liara against something else of equal value. That could be a different love interest, your ties with Cerberus, or even the Council/Spectre status...maybe an entire colony or world...who knows..
We know now that there are or can be at least a couple of different conflicts going on in your saved game. Your LI is probably alive (unless somehow you managed to let them die in the suicide mission) so I see a decision having to be made in regards to them and Liara. Liara is central to the Mass Effect story, even if you didn't bed her, she brought you back to life, that in itself gives her a bigger role then just a meager LI.
Littledoom wrote...
LesEnfantsTerribles wrote...
Also, don't forget that the Game Developer's Conference will start of the 9th March, and there are rumours that BioWare will be showing some DLC there. Could be the Liara DLC.
I think it's the hammerhead they are showing off there unfortunately.
Guest_justinnstuff_*
Littledoom wrote...
LesEnfantsTerribles wrote...
Also, don't forget that the Game Developer's Conference will start of the 9th March, and there are rumours that BioWare will be showing some DLC there. Could be the Liara DLC.
I think it's the hammerhead they are showing off there unfortunately.
Guest_General Stubbs_*
That is really what it comes down to.Nozybidaj wrote...
bjdbwea wrote...
Driveninhifi wrote...
Really, it's most likely a combination of a) running out of development timenot wanting to spoil the comics and c) wanting the leave the player in the dark so they go to the new love interests.
Yeah, exactly. As nice as some hopeful interpretations in this thread here are, I simply doubt they put any much of that thought into it. What you said is what I assume too. But none of those three explanations, nor their combination, is any excuse for screwing this up so badly.
Agreed, no matter what the fact remains they dropped the ball from the start with ME2.
Guest_Littledoom_*
jlb524 wrote...
Littledoom wrote...
LesEnfantsTerribles wrote...
Also, don't forget that the Game Developer's Conference will start of the 9th March, and there are rumours that BioWare will be showing some DLC there. Could be the Liara DLC.
I think it's the hammerhead they are showing off there unfortunately.
Uggghhh!
Well, they can show the hammerhead and just announce Liara DLC.
Modifié par morrie23, 03 mars 2010 - 08:42 .
Guest_justinnstuff_*
Debi-Tage wrote...
There is one part in the comic where Liara tells Feron "If you can't help me find Shepard, I'm done with you!"